Influenced by the emphasis on the authenticity of evidence in judicial proof, the standard system for maintaining the evidential validity of electronic archives also emphasizes the "reliability" of the corresponding content's authenticity. The "reliability" standard is difficult to be effectively implemented in the practical management of archives, which not only restricts the efficient transformation of electronic archives into electronic evidence but also limits the full realization of the evidential value of electronic archives. Guided by judicial needs, it is necessary to follow judicial rules and systematically optimize the standard system for maintaining the evidential validity of electronic archives. First, it should be made clear that the standard system for maintaining the evidential validity of electronic archives corresponds to the evidence admission standard rather than the evidence adoption standard, so as to clarify the boundaries between archive management and judicial determination. Second, guided by the principles of feasibility and promoting transformation, the existing standards for maintaining evidential validity should be structurally adjusted. Requirements of "relevance" or "correlation" should be added, and the requirements of "reliability" should be moderately weakened. At the same time, the requirements of "authenticity" and "security" should be strengthened. This will promote the paradigm transformation of the standard system for maintaining the evidential validity of electronic archives from "guaranteeing content authenticity" to "multidimensional associated proof", and ultimately achieve the organic unity of archival management values and judicial proof needs.