变流量对浅沟侵蚀产沙和水动力参数的影响

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2022.01.002

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为了研究变流量对黄土丘陵区浅沟径流侵蚀产沙的影响，以延安燕儿沟流域26°坡面浅沟为研究对象，在变流量5~10、10~15、15~20和20~25 L/min的条件下，采用野外放水试验测定产沙率、含沙量、流速和阻力参数等产沙和水动力参数的变化。结果表明：变流量后较变流量前，浅沟径流平均产沙率、平均含沙量和平均流速分别减小8.8%~53.5%、31.9%~55.7%和6.8%~18.1%，最大产沙率和最大含沙量分别减少4.8%~66.5%和42.6%~69.0%；变流量后较变流量前阻力系数增加了1.55~2.55倍。变流量后产沙率、含沙量和流速均出现小幅度增大，阻力系数出现小幅度降低。产沙率和含沙量随时间变化在变流量前后存在先增大—到达最大值—减小—稳定的类似特点，整个试验时间内流速总趋势波动减小，阻力系数波动增大。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	郭军权
	王文龙

关键词 ：变流量, 浅沟侵蚀, 产沙, 水动力参数

Abstract：[Background] The runoff usually increases with the inflow of water and rainfall above in the shallow gully, and the runoff is usually a variable. Therefore, to study the influence of runoff variation in shallow gully on the erosion and sediment yield of shallow gully in loess hilly area is a great scientific significance for soil and water loss control on Loess Plateau slope.[Methods] The shallow gully on the 26° slope in Yan'ergou watershed of Yan'an were selected as the research object, and the field drainage erosion test was conducted under the conditions of variable flow of 5-10, 10-15, 15-20 and 20-25 L/min.[Results] The effect of variable flow on sediment yield is that the average sediment yield and maximum sediment yield decrease by 8.8%-53.5% and 4.8%-66.5% respectively after variable flow. The maximum value of sediment yield before variable flow is greater than that after variable flow. The sediment yield after variable flow is different, but the trend is similar, which shows the first increase and decrease the stable; after variable flow, the trend of sediment concentration is the same, It is manifested as:start to increase to reach the maximum The influence of variable flow on sediment concentration is that the sediment concentration before variable flow is greater than that after variable flow, and the average sediment concentration and maximum sediment concentration decrease by 31.9%-55.7% and 42.6%-69.0% respectively, compared with that before variable flow, the average velocity after variable flow decreases by 6.8%-18.1%, and the maximum velocity and average velocity after variable flow are smaller than that before variable flow The reduction of velocity before variable flow is greater than that after variable flow. The resistance coefficient increases by 1.55-2.55 times after variable flow rate compared with that before variable flow rate.[Conclusions] In the process of large runoff, the sediment yield, sediment concentration and runoff velocity increase with the increase of flow, and the resistance coefficient decreases with the increase of flow, but the overall trend increases. Therefore, in the process of prevention and control of runoff and soil loss in shallow gully measures should be taken to prevent the increase of runoff and reduce soil erosion.

Key words： variable flow shallow gully erosion sediment yield hydrodynamic parameter

收稿日期: 2020-01-07

PACS:

S157.1

基金资助:国家自然科学基金"黄土丘陵区坡面浅沟侵蚀过程及预报模型研究"（40471080）；黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室科研专项"土壤侵蚀动力过程模型与土壤侵蚀调控"（10502-T1）；延安市科技局项目（2018HM-01-04）

通讯作者: 王文龙(1964-),男,研究员,博士生导师。主要研究方向:土壤侵蚀与水土保持。E-mail:wlwang@nwsuaf.edu.cn E-mail: wlwang@nwsuaf.edu.cn

作者简介: 郭军权(1977-),男,硕士,教授。主要研究方向:水土保持,环境生态学。E-mail:gjqlt88@163.com

引用本文:

郭军权, 王文龙. 变流量对浅沟侵蚀产沙和水动力参数的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2022, 20(1): 9-14.
GUO Junquan, WANG Wenlong. Influence of variable flow on sediment yield and hydrodynamic parameters of shallow gully erosion. SSWC, 2022, 20(1): 9-14.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/CN/10.16843/j.sswc.2022.01.002 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/CN/Y2022/V20/I1/9

[1]	GONG Jiaguo, JIA Yangwen, ZHOU Zuhao, et al. An experimental study on dynamic processes of ephemeral gully erosion in loess landscapes[J]. Geomorphology, 2011, 125(1):203.
[2]	康宏亮,王文龙,薛智德,等.冲刷条件下黄土丘陵区浅沟侵蚀形态及产流产沙特征[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(20):161. KANG Hongliang, WANG Wenlong, XUE Zhide, et al. Erosion morphology and runoff and sediment yield characteristics of shallow gully in loess hilly area under scouring condition[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016,32(20):161.
[3]	徐锡蒙,郑粉莉,覃超,等.沟蚀发育的黄土坡面上秸秆覆盖防蚀效果研究[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(8):130. XU Ximeng, ZHENG Fenli, QIN Chao, et al. Study on erosion prevention effect of straw mulching on Loess Slope with gully erosion development[J]. Transactions of the CSAM,2015,46 (8):130.
[4]	吴桐嘉,潘成忠,罗明杰,等.降雨和汇流条件下浅沟侵蚀过程试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):22. WU Tongjia, PAN Chengzhong, LUO Mingjie, et al. Experimental study on shallow gully erosion process under rainfall and confluence conditions[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39 (4):22.
[5]	李宏伟,王文龙,车小力,等.非恒定流对浅沟侵蚀产沙及水动力参数的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(6):14. LI Hongwei, WANG Wenlong, CHE Xiaoli, et al. Effects of unsteady flow on sediment yield and hydrodynamic parameters of shallow gully erosion[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011,9 (6):14.
[6]	CASALI J, BENNETT S J, ROBINSON K M. Processes of ephemeral gully[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research,2000,15(1):31.
[7]	CAPRA A, SCICOLONE B. Ephemeral gully erosion in a wheat-cultivated area in Sicily(Italy)[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2002,83(1):119.
[8]	CAPRA P P, SCICOLONE B. Relationships between rainfall characteristics and ephemeral gully erosion in a cultivated catchment in Sicily (Italy)[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2009, 105(1):77.
[9]	NACHTERGAELE J, POESEN J, STEEPEN A, et al. The value of a physically based model versus an empirical approach in the prediction of ephemeral gully erosion for loess-derived soils[J]. Geomorphology, 2001, 40(3):237.
[10]	车小力,王文龙,郭军权,等.上方来水来沙对浅沟侵蚀产沙及水动力参数的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(3):26. CHE Xiaoli, WANG Wenlong, GUO Junquan, et al. Effects of water and sediment from upper reaches on sediment yield and hydrodynamic parameters of shallow gully erosion[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011,9 (3):26.
[11]	郭军权,刘敏,王文龙.上方来水对浅沟侵蚀产沙的野外放水冲刷试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):49. GUO Junquan, LIU Min, WANG Wenlong. Experimental study on field discharge and erosion of shallow gully erosion and sediment yield by upper inflow water[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012,26(3):49.
[12]	董月群,雷廷武,张晴雯,等.集中水流冲刷条件下浅沟径流流速特征研究[J].农业机械学报,2013,44(5):96. DONG Yuequn, LEI Tingwu, ZHANG Qingwen, et al. Study on runoff velocity characteristics of shallow gully under concentrated flow erosion[J]. Transactions of the CSAM,2013,44(5):96.
[13]	张科利,唐克丽.浅沟发育与陡坡开垦历史的研究[J].水土保持学报,1992,6(2):59. ZHANG Keli, TANG Keli. Study on the development of shallow gullies and reclamation history of steep slopes[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,6(2):59.
[14]	龚家国,王文龙,郭军权.黄土丘陵沟壑区浅沟水流水动力学参数实验研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):93. GONG Jiaguo, WANG Wenlong, GUO Junquan. Experimental study on hydrodynamic parameters of shallow gully in Loess Hilly Gully Region[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008,6(1):93.
[15]	郭军权,王文龙.坡度对浅沟侵蚀产沙的野外放水冲刷试验影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):87. GUO Junquan, WANG Wenlong. Effect of slope on shallow gully erosion and sediment yield in field[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,33(4):87.