Drought stress indexes of soil with different texture based on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Quercus variabilis seedling
WANG Qian1, LI Mingwei1, LI Qiang1, CHEN Jingling1, YANG Xitian1, KOU Yuanbo1, ZHANG Jinsong2
1. College of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, 450002, Zhengzhou, China; 2. Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, 100091, Beijing, China
Abstract:[Background] The drought stress index of Quercus variabilis is not perfect, and it can only be roughly divided into three levels: light, medium and heavy drought stress. In addition, it is not clear whether soil texture has a positive or negative effect on Q. variabilis seedlings. This work is to determine the texture effect of soil in the Xiaolangdi of the Yellow River on Q. variabilis seedlings photosynthesis and drought stress index. [Methods] Five different sample points(A, B, E, D and F) of soil and a soil sample point (C) in plain region were selected. 1-year old Q. variabilis seedlings were pot cultured.The pots were watered until saturated and then let dry naturely. Changes of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Q. variabilis seedling under different soil moisture were measured during the period. The chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of maximum quantum efficiency Fv/Fm and the actual quantum yield Y(Ⅱ) were used to analyze soil texture effect. The soil moistures of Fv/Fm and Y(Ⅱ) while starts decreasing and decreasing 50% were used as soil drought stress indices to analyze the differences among different soil texture types and then to determine the soil texture effect. [Results] 1) The changes of Fv/Fm and Y(Ⅱ) with the decrease of soil moisture content was simulated by power function, and the relationship coefficients of simulation were between 0.6 and 0.9. 2) The soil moistures θk of 6 sample points while Fv/Fm and Y(Ⅱ) started decreasing and θ50 while Fv/Fm and Y(Ⅱ) was decreasing 50% were determined. The significance test of ANOVA showed that the soil water stress indices of 6 sample points were divided into 2 categories, and passed the significance test of difference under the reliability of 0.05. The difference between A, B, D of sandy soil mountain land and C of plain area was not obvious. 3) Based on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters Fv/Fm and Y(Ⅱ), drought stress indexes of 6 sample points were obtained. The drought stress index of A, B, C and D was as follows: >13% no drought, >10%-13% mild drought, >8%-10% moderate drought, and >5%-8% severe drought. The drought stress index of E and F was: >19% no drought, >15%-19% mild drought, >13%-15% moderate drought, and >9%-13% severe drought. 4) θk and θ50 were closely correlated with clay and powder grains of soil grain size, and negatively correlated with sand grains. [Conculsions] The influence of soil texture on Q. variabilis seedlings soil moisture was "anti-texture effect", that is, the finer the soil texture is, the worse the soil water availability is, and higher the moisture index of soil under drought stress is higher. The higher the sand content is, the better the water availability is, and the lower the moisture index of soil drought is.
王谦, 李明蔚, 李强, 陈景玲, 杨喜田, 寇渊博, 张劲松. 基于栓皮栎幼苗叶绿素荧光参数的不同质地土壤干旱胁迫指标[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2021, 19(2): 27-32.
WANG Qian, LI Mingwei, LI Qiang, CHEN Jingling, YANG Xitian, KOU Yuanbo, ZHANG Jinsong. Drought stress indexes of soil with different texture based on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Quercus variabilis seedling. SSWC, 2021, 19(2): 27-32.
NOY-MEIR I. Desert ecosystems:Environment and producers[J]. Annual Review of Ecology &Systematics,1973, 4(1):25.
[2]
GALIANO L, MARTINEZ-VILALTA J, LLORET F. Drought-induced multifactor decline of scots pine in the pyrenees and potential vegetation change by the expansion of co-occurring oak species[J]. Ecosystems, 2010,13(7):978.
[3]
FENSHAM R J, BUTLER D W, FOLEY J. How does clay constrain woody biomass in drylands?[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2015, 24(8):950.
[4]
SPERRY J S, HACKE U G. Desert shrub water relations with respect to soil characteristics and plant[J]. Functional Ecology,2002,16(3):367.
[5]
GREENWOOD D L, WEISBERG P J. Density-dependent tree mortality in pinyon-juniper woodlands[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255(7):2129.
[6]
HIERNAUX P, DIARRA L, TRICHON V, et al. Woody plant population dynamics in response to climate changes from 1984 to 2006 in Sahel (Gourma, Mali)[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 375(12):103.
[7]
刘丙霞,邵明安.黄土区退耕草地小尺度土壤水分空间异质性[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(4):60. LIU Bingxia, SHAO Ming'an. Soil water content heterogeneity at small-scale on degrade dgrass lands on Loess Plateau[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 10(4):60.
[8]
陈景玲,王佩舒,刘琳奇,等.光温条件和土壤湿度对栓皮栎幼苗蒸腾潜热和叶温的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(1):62. CHEN Jinlin,WANG Peishu,LIU Linqi,et al.Impacts of radiation,temperature and soil moisture on hidden heat of transpiration and leaf temperature of Quercus variabilis seedlings[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,15(1):62.
[9]
吴敏,张文辉,周建云,等.干旱胁迫对栓皮栎幼苗细根的生长与生理生化指标的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(15):4223. WU Min, ZHANG Wenhui, ZHOU Jianyun, et al.Effects of drought stress on growth physiological and biochemical parameters in fine roots of Quercus variabilis Bl.seedlings[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(15):4223.
[10]
杨帆,苗灵凤,胥晓,等. 植物对干旱胁迫的响应研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2007,13(4):586. YANG Fan, MIAO Lingfeng, XU Xiao, etal. Progress in research of plant responses to drought stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2007, 13(4):586.
[11]
MACKAY S L D, AUFFENBERG T, TANNAHILL C L, et al. Transfection of the type Ⅱ TGF-beta receptor into colon cancer cells increases receptor expression, inhibits cell growth, and reduces the malignant phenotype[J]. Annals of Surgery, 1998, 227(6):781.
[12]
GARCIAVIDAL C, VIASUS D, ROSET A, et al. Low incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia requiring hospitalization[J]. Clinical Microbiology & Infection, 2011, 17(11):1659.
[13]
陈景玲,宋晓明,王谦,等. 基于叶绿素荧光参数的栓皮栎叶片PSⅡ失活高温指标[J]. 中国农业气象,2013,34(5):563. CHEN Jingling,SONG Xiaoming,WANG Qian,et al.High temperature index of PSⅡ inactivation according tochlorophyll fluorescence of Quercus variabilis leaves[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2013, 34(5):563.
[14]
王佩舒,赵薇,陈景玲,等. 高温胁迫对冬小麦旗叶伤害的叶绿素荧光指标初探[J]. 河南农业大学学报,2016,50(1):25. WANG Peishu,ZHAO Wei,CHEN Jingling,et al.Study on the index of chlorophyll fluorescence for the flag leaf ofwinter wheat suffering from high temperature stress[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University,2016,50(1):25.
[15]
ULRICH S.叶绿素荧光与光合作用能量转换-叶绿素荧光基础实验指南[M].韩志国,译.上海:德国Walz公司中国技术服务中心,2004:23. ULRICH S. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic energy conversion:Simple introductory experiments with the TEACHING-PAM chlorophyll fluorometer[M].HAN Zhiguo, translated. Shanghai:Heinz Walz GmbH, 2004:23.
[16]
王谦,陈泠澍,赵薇, 等.干旱条件下栓皮栎叶片光系统活性受损的温度指标[J].中国农业气象,2019,40(5):308. WANG Qian, CHEN Lingshu, ZHAO Wei, et al. Temperature index of Quercus variabilis leaf PSH activity damage under high temperature combined with drought[J].Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology,2019,40(5):308.
[17]
王谦,刘琳奇,王佩舒, 等.静风下土壤水分胁迫的栓皮栎幼苗气候空间上限列线[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(6):73. WANG Qian, LIU Linqi, WANG Peishu, et al. Series lines of climate space up limit of Quercus variabilis seedlings in static wind and different soil water stress[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,15(6):73.
[18]
王佩舒,王威红,陈景玲, 等.栓皮栎幼苗叶气温差随太阳辐射和风速变化的列线研究[J].中国农业气象,2016,37(2):213 WANG Peishu, WANG Weihong, CHEN Jingling, et al.Serieslines on change of leaf temperature difference of Quercus variabilis with solar radiation and wind speed[J].Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology,2016,37(2):213.
[19]
陈景玲,王静,王谦, 等.基于叶绿素荧光的荆条灌丛对栓皮栎幼苗庇荫效应研究[J].西北林学院学报,2014,29(4):46. CHEN Jingling, WANG Jing, WANG Qian, et al.Patronage effect of vervain family to Quercus variabilis saplings based on leaf chlorophyll fluorescence[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2014,29(4):46.
[20]
陈景玲,张冬,王谦, 等.荆条灌丛孤立冠层下不同位置冠层的叶面积指数和透光率分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(4):92. CHEN Jingling, ZHANG Dong, WANG Qian, et al.Leaf area index and light transmittance at different positions under isolated Vitex negundo var. heterophylla canopy[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,12(4):92.