The requirement in Article 28 of Regulation on the Implementation of Archives Law, that archive service provider should be the enterprise that has legal person status, may be interpreted as "legally established, with a certain governance structure and assets, and they are qualified to engage in archives service outsourcing". As long as it can ensure the security of archives and service quality, it should be allowed to be the service provider of archives service outsourcing. Meanwhile, in order to ensure the performance of the contract, when the client, in accordance with the provisions of Article 28 of Regulation on the Implementation of Archives Law, provides whole-process guidance to archival service enterprises, the guidance should be expressed as a clear "requirement" rather than an ambiguous "guidance" based on the right-obligation framework established in Civil Code for the work contract. Besides that, where an archival service enterprise knows that there are potential security hazards to archives, and fails to take measures during providing archives service, the civil nature of archives service agreement should be respected, and the path of contract control should be given priority. The administrative intervention measures stipulated in Article 51 (1) of Regulation on the Implementation of Archives Law should be considered as auxiliary measures.