档案学基础理论的适应性发展— 基于组织沟通视角的分析

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.04.005

档案学研究

2021, Vol. 35

Issue (4): 32-40 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.04.005

基础理论研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

档案学基础理论的适应性发展— 基于组织沟通视角的分析

杨茜茜

中山大学信息管理学院广州 510006

Adaptive Development of the Basic Theory of Archival Science: Analysis from the Perspective of Organizational Communication

YANG Qianqian

School of Information Management,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510006

输出:BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要: 数字时代下的古文书学档案思想和档案后保管思想分别代表了两种不同的档案学发展路径,使得当前以“三位一体”为主要内容的档案学基础理论在司法行政和文化社会两种语境下产生一定的错位。本文主要采用比较理论研究方法,引入组织理论,建立了正式、非正式组织—沟通的四维分析框架,将古文书学档案思想和档案后保管思想的实质放置在上述框架下进行阐释、对比并作一致化理解。论文在此基础上探讨档案学基础理论适应性发展问题,从认知理论和方法理论相统一的角度提出一种可能性,认知理论研究从档案管理经验归纳延伸到档案现象认知构建,方法理论研究从归纳档案管理原则标准延伸到关于档案制度正式化的深入思考。

Abstract：In the digital era, the archival ideologies based on diplomatics and post-custody have respectively represented different paths for the development of archival science, which put the current trinity basic theory of archival science into a dilemma of separation between the contexts of judicial administration and culture social. This paper mainly adopts the research methods of comparative theory and introduces organization theory to construct a four-dimensional analytical framework consists of the elements of formal and informal organizational communication. Then the essence of the archival ideologies based on diplomatics and post-custody are put into the above framework to explain, compare and make a consistent understanding. It further discusses the adaptive development of the basic theory of archival science and puts forward a possible answer basing on the synchronization of cognition theory and methodological theory. While the study of the former should be extended from the induction of the archives management experiences to the establishment of cognition on archives phenomenon, the latter should be extended from the induction of archives management principles and standards to deeper research in the formalization of archives system.

出版日期: 2021-07-29

基金资助:本文系广东省自然科学基金博士科研启动项目“基于特征关联识别的数字资源归档鉴定模型及实证研究”（编号：2018A03010261）的阶段性研究成果

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

杨茜茜. 档案学基础理论的适应性发展— 基于组织沟通视角的分析[J]. 档案学研究, 2021, 35(4): 32-40.
YANG Qianqian. Adaptive Development of the Basic Theory of Archival Science: Analysis from the Perspective of Organizational Communication. Archives Science Study, 2021, 35(4): 32-40.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.04.005 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2021/V35/I4/32

[1] Ham F.Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era[J]. The American Archivist,1981(3):207-216.
[2] Cook T. Electronic Records,Paper Minds:The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era[J]. Archives & Social Studies:A Journal of Interdisciplinary Research,2007,1(0):399-443.
[3] 徐拥军. 档案后保管范式与知识管理[J]. 档案学通讯,2008(2):27-31.
[4] Upward F.Structuring the Records Continuum-Part One:Post custodial Principles and Properties[J]. Archives and Manuscripts,1996(2):268-285.
[5] Becerra-Licha S.Participatory and Post-Custodial Archives as Community Practice[J]. Educause Review,2017(6):90-91.
[6] Henningham N,Evans J,Morgan H.The Australian Women's Archives Project:Creating and Co-curating Community Feminist Archives in a Post-custodial Age[J]. Australian Feminist Studies,2017,32:91-107.
[7] 冯惠玲,加小双. 档案后保管理论的演进与核心思想[J]. 档案学通讯,2019(4):4-12.
[8] 张衍,黄清晨. 后保管理论与文件连续体理论关系的重新审视[J]. 档案学研究,2020(1):25-31.
[9] 徐拥军,李子林,李孟秋. 后现代档案学的理论贡献与实践影响[J]. 档案学通讯,2020(1):31-40.
[10] Cook T.Evidence,memory,identity,and community:four shifting archival paradigms[J]. Archival Science,2013,13:95-120.
[11] 闫静,王露露. 悖论式发展:后现代档案学理论的现状与局限[J]. 北京档案,2019(7):16-21.
[12] 何嘉荪,潘连根. 档案学基础理论研究发展的正确道路[J]. 档案学通讯,1999(5):23-26.
[13] 冯惠玲,张辑哲. 档案学概论[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:236-282.
[14] 何嘉荪,傅荣校. 文件运动规律研究—从新角度审视档案学基础理论[M]. 北京:中国档案出版社,1999:76-95,144-159.
[15] 傅荣校,靳颖. 重新审视档案学基础理论与后保管时代的来临—后保管时代档案学基础理论适应性研究之一[J].档案管理,2008(1):19-23.
[16] Shepherd E,Yeo G.Managing Records:A Handbook of Principles and Practice[M]. London:Facet Publishing, 2003:5-8.
[17] Schellenberg T.Modern Archives:Principles and Techniques[M].Chicago:The Society of American Archivists,2003:37-39.
[18] 冯天予. 混乱与变革:巴达维亚共和国行政改革与档案管理研究—兼论《荷兰手册》诞生背景[J]. 山东档案,2019(6):50-56.
[19] 徐拥军,蔡美波. 中国对苏联全宗理论的借鉴、修正与创新[J]. 档案学通讯,2016(1):27-30.
[20] Ketelaar E.Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual[J]. Archivaria,1996,41:31-40.
[21] 傅荣校,靳颖. 文件整体运动描述:是文件生命周期模式,还是用文件连续体模式?—后保管时代档案学基础理论适应性问题研究之三[J]. 档案管理,2008(3):7-12.
[22] 连志英. 一种新范式:文件连续体理论的发展及应用[J]. 档案学研究,2018(1):14-21.
[23] Tognoli N,Guimarães J.Postmodern Archival Science and Contemporary Diplomatics:New Approaches for Archival Knowledge Organization[EB/OL].[2020-05-12].http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117663.
[24] Duranti L.The Archival Bond[J]. Archives and Museum Informatics,1997,11:213-218.
[25] 侯衡. 电子时代档案学基础理论发展探究—读《古文书学:旧学科的新用途》[J]. 档案学研究,2018(3):15-20.
[26] Delma B.Manifesto for a Contemporary Diplomatics: From Institutional Documents to Organic Information[J]. American Archivist,1996,59:438-452.
[27] 戴维·比尔曼,黄霄羽. 古文书学、官僚机构和欧美电子文件管理[J]. 四川档案,1997(6):30-34.
[28] 戴维·比尔曼,黄霄羽. 古文书学、官僚机构和欧美电子文件管理(续)[J]. 四川档案,1998(1):31-34.
[29] Tough A.The Post-custodial/Pro-custodial Argument from a Records Management Perspective[J]. Journal of the Society of Archivists,2004 (1):19-26.
[30] Cook T.Archival science and postmodernism:new formulations for old concepts[J]. Archival Science,2001,1:3-24.
[31] Cook T.The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era:Theory,Problems and Solutions[J]. Archivaria,1992,35:24-37.
[32] Bailey C.From the Top Down:The Practice of Macro-Appraisal[J]. Archivaria,1997,43:89-128.
[33] Cunningham A,Oswald R.Some Functions are More Equal than Others:The Development of a Macroappraisal Strategy for the National Archives of Australia[J]. Archival Science,2005,5:163-184.
[34] Ketelaar E.Archivalisation and archiving[J]. Archives and Manuscripts,1999(1):54-61.
[35] Foscarini F.Diplomatics and genre theory as complementary approaches[J]. Archival Science,2012,12:389-409.
[36] 王燕,王娟. 非正式组织研究综述[J].燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013 (1):136-140.
[37] 翁定军. 超越正式与非正式的界限—当代组织社会学对组织的理解[J]. 社会,2004(2):12-15.
[38] 何嘉荪,傅荣校. 文件运动规律研究—从新角度审视档案学基础理论[M]. 北京:中国档案出版社,1999:113-144.
[39] 苗俊玲. 论信息技术对官僚制组织沟通的维护[J].行政论坛,2013(6):25-29.
[40] 陈叶敏. 论官僚组织内部信息沟通过程中的信息歪曲及其防治[J]. 理论观察,2007(6):66-67.
[41] 沈杨,张宇. 中国网络公共领域下的非正式沟通:流变、建构及阻滞[J]. 重庆社会科学,2020(3):84-93.
[42] 陆阳. 基于组织合法性与社会化行为的文件形成机制研究[J]. 档案学研究,2019(3):24-31.
[43] 缪雨虹. 合法性权力与档案的互构[J]. 档案与建设,2017(11):21-23.
[44] 丁海斌. 档案学本体论—兼谈档案学的根本原则[J].档案学通讯,2015(6):14-19.
[45] 米辰峰. 马比荣与西方古文书学的发展[J]. 历史研究,2004(5):140-152,192.
[46] 王岑曦. 前来源原则时代的档案学—简论17至19世纪古文书学与档案学的发展[J]. 档案学通讯,2019(5):85-92.
[47] Ketelaar E.The Difference Best Postponed?Cultures and Comparative Archival Science[J]. Archivaria,1997,44:142-148.
[48] 马文娟. 信息技术变革对官僚组织形态的影响—兼评《官僚制内幕》[J].电子政务,2018(2):54-61.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed