后现代档案学理论的主要内容

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2020.06.003

档案学研究

2020, Vol. 34

Issue (6): 47-52 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2020.06.003

基础理论研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

后现代档案学理论的主要内容

徐拥军^1,²,王露露¹

1 中国人民大学信息资源管理学院北京 100872
2 中国人民大学人文北京研究中心北京 100872

The Main Content of Postmodern Archival Theory

Yongjun XU^1,²,Lulu WANG¹

1 School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
2 Humanities Beijing（Humanities Olympics）Research Center, Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872

全文:

HTML

PDF(995 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要:

后现代档案学理论泛指自20世纪80年代以来,档案学界在后现代主义思潮影响下探索新的研究领域、主题,产生的新的档案观念、思想。其主要内容是：反思档案与文件的定义;反思档案价值和鉴定理论;反思档案的主观性和客观性;反思档案工作者的角色与职能。

Abstract：

Postmodern archival theory generally refers to the new archival concepts and ideas that have been explored in the field of archival science under the influence of the postmodernism trend since the 1980s. Its main content is reflection on the definition of archives and records, reflection on the value and appraisal theory of archives, reflection on the subjectivity and objectivity of archives, reflection on roles and functions of archivists.

出版日期: 2020-12-28

基金资助:2018年度教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助重大项目“后现代档案学理论研究”研究成果之一(18JHQ005)

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

徐拥军,王露露. 后现代档案学理论的主要内容[J]. 档案学研究, 2020, 34(6): 47-52.
Yongjun XU,Lulu WANG. The Main Content of Postmodern Archival Theory. Archives Science Study, 2020, 34(6): 47-52.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2020.06.003 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2020/V34/I6/47

[1]	[38] Ridener J. From polders to postmodernism:A concise history of archival theory[M]. Library Juice Press, LLC, 2009: 131.
[2]	注:鉴于后现代主义主要建立在包罗万象的哲学思想之上,因此各方的回应现在还是处于争议之中.
[3]	注:宏大叙事,也称为元叙事,由Lyotard于20世纪70年代提出.宏大叙事认为,历史的发展建立在绝对理性秩序之上,提前预设了未来的发展走向,通常是权威的主流话语.
[4]	Lyotard J F. The postmodern condition:A report on knowledge[M]. U of Minnesota Press, 1984.
[5]	[40][44] Derrida J Archive fever:A Freudian impression[M]. University of Chicago Press, 1996.
[6]	[50] Ketelaar E. Tacit narratives:The meanings of archives[J]. Archival science, 2001,1(2):131-141.
[7]	徐拥军, 李子林, 李孟秋. 后现代档案学的理论贡献与实践影响[J]. 档案学通讯, 2020(1):31-40.
[8]	Cook T. Evidence,Memory,Identity,and Community: Four Shifting Archival Paradigms[J]. Archival Science, 2013,13(2-3):95-120.
[9]	王玉珏等. 基于文件连续体理论模型的“第五维度理论”[J]. 档案学通讯, 2018(1):24-29.
[10]	Hardiman R. En mal d'archive:Postmodernist Theory and Recordkeeping[J]. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 2009,30(1):27-44.
[11]	[31][39] Brothman B. Orders of Value:Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice39] Brothman B. Orders of Value:Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice[J]. Archivaria, 1991,32:79-100.
[12]	注:主要是指一些利用档案进行其他社会生产活动的群体,包括历史学家.
[13]	[34][49][51] Cook T, Schwartz J M. Archives,records, and power:From(postmodern)theory to(archival) performance[J]. Archival Science, 2002,2(3-4):171-185.
[14]	[20][28][33][42][43][48] Heald C. Is there room for archives in the Postmodern World?28][33][42][43][48] Heald C. Is there room for archives in the Postmodern World?[J]. The American Archivist, 1996,59(1):88-101.
[15]	[30][36][37][45][54][56] MacNeil H. Archival theory and practice:Between two paradigms36][37][45][54][56] MacNeil H. Archival theory and practice:Between two paradigms[J]. Archivaria, 1994, 6-20,37.
[16]	[17][25][46][47] Schwartz J M, Cook T. Archives, records,and power:The making of modern memory25][46][47] Schwartz J M,Cook T. Archives, records,and power:The making of modern memory[J]. Archival science, 2002,2(1-2):1-19.
[18]	[19][41] Ketelaar E. Archival temples,archival prisons: Modes of power and protection[J]. Archival science, 2002,2(3-4):221-238.
[21]	Ribeiro F. Archival science and changes in the paradigm[J]. Archival science, 2001,1(3):295-310.
[22]	王静, 王萍. 评特里·库克以后现代思想诠释档案学[J]. 档案与建设, 2005(7):10-13.
[23]	特里·库克, 李音. 四个范式:欧洲档案学的观念和战略的变化—1840年以来西方档案观念与战略的变化[J]. 档案学研究, 2011(3):81-87.
[24]	Greene M. The power of meaning:The archival mission in the postmodern age[J]. The American Archivist, 2002,65(1):42-55.
[26]	王萍. 对档案价值理论的后现代审视[J]. 档案管理, 2000(5):31-33.
[27]	李佩仑. 后现代主义与档案学:从德里达、福柯到特里·库克[J]. 档案学通讯, 2012(2):4-7.
[29]	Tom Nesmith. Seeing Archives:Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives[J]. The American Archivist, 2002,65(1):24-41.
[32]	Cook T. Archival science and postmodernism:New formulations for old concepts[J]. Archival Science, 2001,1(1):3-24.
[35]	Brothman B. The limits of limits:Derridean deconstruction and the archival institution[J]. Archivaria, 1993,83.
[52]	Cook T. Fashionable nonsense or professional rebirth:postmodernism and the practice of archives[J]. Archivaria, 2001,51:14-35.
[53]	注:MacNeil在文中引用的国际知名档案教育专家Terry Eastwood于1992年所发表的文章Unity and Diversity in the Development of Archival Science in North America,现在未能查找到原文.
[57]	胡瑞珩, 刘卫平. 从信息保管者到知识管理者:谈特里·库克的“后保管模式”[J]. 档案与建设, 1999(11):8-9.
[58]	曲春梅. 解构与重建:后现代背景下对档案职业公信力的思考[J]. 档案学通讯, 2016(3):8-12.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed