Please wait a minute...
档案学研究  2025, Vol. 39 Issue (3): 117-125    DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2025.03.015
  境外学术研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
数字时代欧盟档案战略的体系性创新及启示
漆晨航
中国人民大学法学院 北京 100872
Systematic Innovation and Implications of EU Archival Strategy in the Digital Era
Chenhang QI
Law School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
全文: HTML    PDF(1235 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

数字时代,档案管理工作面临社会数字化转型带来的风险与挑战,欧盟地区针对数字时代的档案战略作出体系性创新,有可借鉴之处。在话语演进层面,欧盟通过数字规范建设、共同价值传导与绿色转型要求,将档案管理工作的主权话语范畴从国家向欧盟扩张。在风险治理层面,欧盟将虚假信息、人工智能生成内容视为数字时代关键的档案风险,并从整体确定了风险要素内容与治理方法。在矛盾疏解层面,欧盟明确档案数字开放要求,解决以往过于侧重个人数据保护导致开放进程缓慢的问题,并重述了档案开放的数字化转型目标。三方面协调最终将档案管理工作融入欧盟的数字主权建设体系。对于我国的档案战略而言,首先,强化政治理念的档案化阐述,将以人为中心、法治与安全等理念精密化纳入规范文本。其次,建立档案科技风险的研判机制,强化档案法规范与其他实体法衔接。最后,将“信息资源提供者”定位嵌入档案管理工作,发挥档案服务、赋能社会主体功能。

Abstract

In the digital era, archival management faces risks and challenges arising from the overall digital transformation of society. The EU region has made systematic innovations in its archival strategy for the digital age, offering valuable insights for others. In terms of discourse evolution, the EU has expanded the scope of archival management sovereignty discourse from the national level to the EU level through the construction of digital norms, the transmission of common values, and the requirements of green transformation. In terms of risk governance, the EU considers false information, the application of archives generated by artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity as important archival risks in the digital age, and has identified risk elements and governance methods from the EU-wide perspective. In terms of resolution of contradictions, The EU has clarified requirements for the digital opening of archives, addressing the previously slow progress due to an overemphasis on personal data protection. The coordination from three aspects will ultimately integrate the archival management work into the construction system of the EU's digital sovereignty. For China, first, it is necessary to strengthen the archivization of political concepts, and precisely incorporate concepts centered on people, rule of law, and security into normative texts. Second, establish a mechanism for judging the risks of archival science and technology, and strengthen the connection between archival laws and other substantive laws. Finally, embed the positioning of "information resource providers" into archival management work, and give play to the functions of archival services and empowering social entities.

出版日期: 2025-06-28
引用本文:

漆晨航. 数字时代欧盟档案战略的体系性创新及启示[J]. 档案学研究, 2025, 39(3): 117-125.
Chenhang QI. Systematic Innovation and Implications of EU Archival Strategy in the Digital Era. Archives Science Study, 2025, 39(3): 117-125.

链接本文:

https://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2025.03.015      或      https://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2025/V39/I3/117

[1] 中办国办印发《“十四五”全国档案事业发展规划》[J]. 中国档案, 2021(6):18-23.
[2] 蔡盈芳. 全面贯彻落实党的二十大精神推进档案事业现代化发展[J]. 档案学研究, 2023(3):4-8.
[3] [14][16][18][20][24][27][31][32][37] The European Archives Group. Strategy of the European Archives(2025-2030)[R]. Brussels: The European Archives Group, 2024.
[4] Archives Nationales. Cadre stratégique commun de modernisation des archives 2020-2024[R]. Paris: Archives nationales, 2020.
[5] DE PASQUALE A. From chaos to cosmos: the digital library of The Italian Central State Archive[J]. JLIS. it, 2023(3):164-181.
[6] 潘连根. 档案学元理论研究[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2019:19.
[7] 华林, 谢梦晴, 冯安仪, 等. 维护领海主权视域下我国海疆历史档案编研证据链构建[J]. 档案学通讯, 2024(3):5.
[8] 蒂莫西·加顿艾什. 档案:一部个人史[M]. 汪仲,译. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2015:18-19.
[9] 陆阳, 蔡之玲. 档案在族群认同中的价值旨归、功能认知与机制阐释[J]. 档案学研究, 2021(6):13.
[10] 吴桐, 刘宏松. 数字主权愿景下的欧盟数字治理改革—修正的历史制度主义视角[J]. 欧洲研究, 2024(2):1-35,173.
[11] European Parliament. Digital sovereignty for Europe[R]. Strasbourg: European Parliament, 2020.
[12] 贾平凡. 遏制虚假信息传播需全球合作[N]. 人民日报(海外版), 2024-07-08(10).
[13] 欧盟数字主权战略下的系列法律与数字时代档案战略相关的重点法案主要有:《通用数据保护条例》(General Data Protection Regulation,2018年),《数据治理法案》(Data Governance Act,2022年),《数字市场法》(Digital Market Act,2023年),《数据法案》(Data Act,2024年),《数字服务法》(Digital Service Act,2024年),《人工智能法案》(Artificial Intelligence Act,2024年).
[15] BEENTJES G, PRINSEN F, MARTENS M H J, et al. Updating the Netherlands' Archives Act: regulations and responsibility[C]// Proceedings of the ICOM-CC 20th Triennial Conference:Working Towards a Sustainable Past. ICOM-CC, 2023.
[17] 周林兴. 论档案馆的文化治理研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2020(1):73-78.
[19] The European Parliament, The Council and the Commission. European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles for the Digital Decade[R]. Strasbourg: The European Parliament, 2022.
[21] SETT S, DOS SANTOS RIBEIRO C, PRAT C, et al. Access and benefit-sharing by the European Virus Archive in response to COVID-19[J]. The Lancet Microbe, 2022(4):e316-e323.
[22] FETTING C. The European green deal[J]. ESDN Report, 2020(9):53.
[23] European Commission. 2030 digital compass: the European Way for the Digital Decade[R/OL]. [2024-11-12]. https://www.europeansources.info/record/2030-digital-compass-the-european-way-for-the-digital-decade/.
[25] European Commission. Tackling online disinformation: a European approach[R]. Brussels: European Commission, 2018.
[26] O'SHAUGHNESSY N. From disinformation to fake news: forwards into the past[J]. The SAGE handbook of propaganda, 2020: 55-70.
[28] Reports Archive[EB/OL].[2024-09-10]. https://disinfocode.eu/reports-archive/?years=2024.
[29] ACKER A, CHAIET M. The weaponization of web archives:data craft and COVID-19 publics[EB/OL].[2020-09-28]. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/fe7f8a0d-d91f-4fc2-857c-fe005ca67473/content.
[30] 虚假信息的概念基本参照前文欧盟官方的定义,而所谓非真实的信息是指不是基于特定目的故意制作的错误或误导性信息,此类信息因目的性差异可能违法也可能不违法(特别是未经大规模传播的非真实信息),但总体上仍然违背信息真实性的要求.参见:漆晨航. 生成式人工智能的虚假信息风险特征及其治理路径[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024(3):112-120.
[33] 张博闻. 公共数据开放的“档案参与”:现状调研、影响因素与进路选择[J]. 档案学通讯, 2024(4):71-79.
[34] BALL C, HUANG K T. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI)divide: an empirical examination of the Micro-Macro factors that predict GAI knowledge and use[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2023(1):878-880.
[35] Recommendation No. R(2000)13 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on a European policy on access to archives[R]. Brussels: Council of Europe, 2000.
[36] FRIEDEWALD M, SZEKELY I, KARABOGA M. How accessible are European Public Archives? An assessment of the compliance with the council of Europe Recommendation R(2000)13 on a European Policy on Access to Archives[J]. Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies, 2023(1):21.
[38] European Parliament. The council of the European union. Regulation(EU)2024/903[EB/OL].[2023-03-22]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R0903&qid=1740464744903.
[39] European Parliament, The Council of the European Union. Regulation(EU)2024/1183[EB/OL].[2024-04-30]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1183&qid=1740464817983.
[40] The European Archives Group. Archive in Europe facing the challenges of the digital ara.[R/OL].[2012-09-21]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0513:FIN:EN:PDF.
[41] 漆晨航, 陈刚. 基于文本分析的欧盟数据主权战略审视及其启示[J]. 情报杂志, 2021(8):95-103,80.
[42] 林秀芹. 欧盟数据赋能的法律促进路径:挑战、应对与启示[J]. 世界社会科学, 2024(4):40-64,243.
[43] 王葎. 话语分析视域下的核心价值观生活化逻辑[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(6):73-78.
[44] 张彪, 李冲, 李芳. 《中华人民共和国档案法》语言模糊性的治理路径[J]. 档案学研究, 2024(4):31-39.
[45] 宋保振. 论“数字化生活权”及其义务谱系[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2024(4):52-67.
[46] 蔡盈芳. 数据管理业务与档案融合管理研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2021(3):40-46.
[47] 马识途. 《档案法》评注编纂:功能定位与范式构想[J]. 档案学通讯, 2025(1):74-79.
[48] 谷永超. 论《档案法》与《刑法》的衔接[J]. 档案学通讯, 2024(3):13-18.
[49] 肖秋会, 张博闻. 新《档案法》视域下公民档案利用权利救济路径研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2024(3):46-53.
[50] 黄霄羽. 档案社会化服务研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2016:90.
No related articles found!