Please wait a minute...
档案学研究  2025, Vol. 39 Issue (3): 93-99    DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2025.03.012
  档案安全保障 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
清至民国时期歙县串票及其制成材料性能研究——以中国人民大学博物馆藏《钱粮票本》为例
王歌
中国人民大学信息资源管理学院 北京 100872
Preservation and Material Composition of Shexian Chuanpiao from the Qing to the Republican Era:An Example from the Qian Liang Piao Ben in the Museum of Renmin University of China
Ge WANG
School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
全文: HTML    PDF(33103 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

串票作为清政府征收田赋时发给粮户的缴款凭证,具有重要的法律和历史价值。以中国人民大学博物馆藏徽州文书《钱粮票本》(空白账簿册及夹附的105枚道光至民国年间串票)为研究对象,借助内容考证、基础性能检测、破损调查和内部结构成分分析等手段,溯源文本价值、挖掘载体信息、延续文书寿命。研究发现清代串票用纸为竹纸,民国时期为竹、草混料纸。写印材料复杂,印章油渗、字迹洇化等字迹病害严重,红外及XRF分析发现了松烟墨和油烟墨两种墨迹成分,胶类物质为动物骨胶,印泥中添加白矾;纸张填料为高岭土及滑石粉。研究为了解清代基层税赋制度提供佐证,并为徽州文书串票的保护与修复提供了理论基础和实践指导。

Abstract

As a receipt issued to taxpayers during the Qing Dynasty for the collection of land taxes, the chuanpiao holds significant legal and historical value. To trace the text's value, extract information from its medium, and extend the document's lifespan, this paper studies the Huizhou Document Qian Liang Piao Ben ( a blank account book accompanied by 105 serial tax receipts dating from the Daoguang reign period of the Qing Dynasty to the Republic of China era) held in the museum of Renmin University of China. Utilizing content verification, basic performance testing, damage investigation, and internal structural component analysis, the study found that the chuanpiao were primarily made of bamboo paper, with complex writing and printing materials. Severe ink damage issues such as ink spreading and smudging were identified. Infrared and XRF analyses revealed two types of ink: pine soot ink and oil soot ink. The adhesive substance was identified as animal bone glue, with alum added to the ink pad. The paper fillers were kaolin and talcum powder. This research provides evidence for understanding the tax system at the grassroots level during the Qing Dynasty and offers theoretical and practical guidance for the protection and restoration of Huizhou documents and chuanpiao.

出版日期: 2025-06-28
引用本文:

王歌. 清至民国时期歙县串票及其制成材料性能研究——以中国人民大学博物馆藏《钱粮票本》为例[J]. 档案学研究, 2025, 39(3): 93-99.
Ge WANG. Preservation and Material Composition of Shexian Chuanpiao from the Qing to the Republican Era:An Example from the Qian Liang Piao Ben in the Museum of Renmin University of China. Archives Science Study, 2025, 39(3): 93-99.

链接本文:

https://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2025.03.012      或      https://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2025/V39/I3/93

[1] 兴化市党史方志办公室,兴化市档案馆. 咸丰重修兴化县志[M]. 扬州: 广陵书社, 2023:142.
[2] 钮希强. 清代杭州府串票初步研究[J]. 浙江档案, 2020(9):46-49.
[3] [8] 何秋琴. 承载漕粮税制的历史凭证—省档案馆馆藏晚清串票概览[J]. 浙江档案, 2010(1):50-51.
[4] [21] 阎春生, 黄晨, 韩松涛, 等. 古代纸质文物科学检测技术综述[J]. 中国光学, 2020(5):936-964.
[5] 王亚亚, 张美芳. 中国人民大学博物馆藏GXW0172号唐代西域文书残片制成材料结构与成分分析及其应用[J]. 档案学通讯, 2022(5):101-108.
[6] [11]民国歙县志[M]. 石国柱,楼文钊,修. 许承光,纂. 南京: 江苏古籍出版社, 1998:136,36.
[7] 李光伟. 清代田赋灾蠲制度之演变[J]. 中国高校社会科学, 2019(2):83-100,159.
[9] [10] 邹晓昇. 银元主币流通与上海洋厘行市的更替[J]. 史学月刊, 2006(8):36-42.
[12] 周耀林, 戴旸, 林明, 等. 档案文献遗产保护[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2012:190.
[13] 张美芳, 唐跃进. 档案保护概论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2013:262.
[14] 何秋菊, 马婧婕, 范胜利, 等. 修复材料对书画纸张酸化的影响评估[J]. 文博, 2020(3):94-100,25.
[15] 徐文娟, 陈元生. 漂白对宣纸性能影响的研究[J]. 文物保护与考古科学, 2007(2):20-25.
[16] 宋欣, 于晨. 基于科技检测的德格土司官府与民间文书制成材料对比分析[J]. 档案学通讯, 2023(2):82-90.
[17] [18][19] 易晓辉. 中国古纸与传统手工纸植物纤维显微图谱[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2022:371,274,290.
[20] [22] 姚新生. 有机化合物波谱解析[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2003:49,273.
No related articles found!