Please wait a minute...
档案学研究  2022, Vol. 36 Issue (1): 79-84    DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2022.01.011
  档案资源建设 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
LAM馆藏资源的元数据整合方法比较分析
贾君枝
中国人民大学信息资源管理学院 北京 100872
Metadata Integration Methods for LAM Collection Resource
JIA Junzhi
School of Information Resource Management,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872
全文: HTML    PDF(1250 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

图书馆、档案馆、博物馆馆藏资源整合是文化资源得以广泛传播利用与共享的基础,与同类型机构资源整合相比,LAM资源整合中馆藏资源类型不一,资源描述所使用的元数据标准繁多,描述细粒度大小不同,整合难度增加。本文在梳理LAM馆藏资源整合流程的基础上,认为LAM馆藏资源的整合实质是不同类型机构之间元数据的整合。结合不同的LAM项目,将馆藏资源的元数据整合方法划分为以元数据、本体、关联数据模型为映射中心的三种类型,结合语义网络发展技术对每一种整合方法进行优劣势分析,并围绕EAD标准,展示其与本体、关联数据模型进行映射的具体实现方式。

关键词 馆藏资源元数据集成LAMEAD    
Abstract

Library, archives, museums collection resources integration provides the basis of widespread use and share of cultural resources. Compared with the same type organization resources integration, the difficulty of LAM resources integration increases owing to different types of collection resources, metadata standards, and description of fine grain size. On the basis of analysis of the integration process of LAM collection resources, it is considered that the essence of the integration of LAM collection resources is the integration of metadata among various institutions. The metadata integration methods of collection resources are divided into three types: metadata-based, ontology-based, and linked data model based for mapping. Combining with the development of semantic web, the advantages and disadvantages of each kind of integration method are analyzed, and the realized way of mapping of EAD with ontology and linked data model is demonstrated.

Key wordscollection resource    metadata integration    LAM    EAD
出版日期: 2023-02-23
引用本文:

贾君枝. LAM馆藏资源的元数据整合方法比较分析[J]. 档案学研究, 2022, 36(1): 79-84.
JIA Junzhi. Metadata Integration Methods for LAM Collection Resource. Archives Science Study, 2022, 36(1): 79-84.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2022.01.011      或      http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2022/V36/I1/79

[1] 穆向阳, 朱学芳. 图书、博物、档案数字化服务融合模式研究[J]. 情报科学, 2016(3):14-19.
[2] 赵蓉英, 王嵩, 董克. 国内馆藏资源聚合模式研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014(18):138-143.
[3] 李金芮, 肖希明. 国外公共数字文化资源整合管理体制模式及其适用性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015(3):26-34.
[4] 田蓉, 唐义. 国外公共数字文化资源整合中的资源组织方式研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2016(6):68-74.
[5] 宋琳琳, 李海涛. 大型文献数字化项目元数据互操作调查与启示[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012(5):27-38.
[6] 黄文碧. 基于元数据关联的馆藏资源聚合研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015(4):74-79.
[7] 朱学芳, 丁笑舒. 基于本体的LAM数字资源服务融合可视化研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2020(8):96-102.
[8] World digital library[EB/OL]. [2020-04-08].https://www.wdl.org/en/sets/imperial-russia/map/.
[9] California Digital Library[EB/OL]. [2020-07-12].https://cdlib.org/services/pad/oac/.
[10] Doerr Martin. The CIDOC CRM - an Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata[EB/OL].(2003-01-01)[2020-01-08]. https://projects.ics.forth.gr/isl/publications/paperlink/Doerr_V2.pdf.
[11] CRM[EB/OL].[2020-06-08]. http://www.cidoc-crm.org/.
[12] ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group. Definition of the CIDOC conceptual reference model[R/OL].(2017-10-27)[2020-08-07]. https://cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/cidoc_crm_version_5.0.4.pdf.
[13] WarSampo:Finnish World War II on the semantic web[EB/OL]. [2020-09-09]. https://seco.cs.aalto.fi/projects/sotasampo/en/.
[14] Arches[EB/OL]. [2020-09-09]https://www.archesproject.org/.
[15] Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek[EB/OL]. [2020-06-08].https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/content/ueber-uns.
[16] Riva Pat, Žumer Maja. FRBRoo,the IFLA Library Reference Model,and now LRMoo:a circle of development[R/OL].(2018-6-26)[2020-06-08]. http://library.ifla.org/2130/1/074-riva-en.pdf.
[17] Chen Ya-Ning, Hao-Ren. Hao-Ren.FRBRoo-based Approach to Heterogeneous Metadata Integration[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2013(5):623-637.
[18] Theodoridou Maria, Doerr Martin. Mapping of the encoded archival description DTD element set to the CIDOC CRM[R/OL].(2013-07-16)[2020-08-06]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11888004.pdf.
[19] Lina Bountouri, Manolis Gergatsoulis. The Semantic Mapping of Archival Metadata to the CIDOC CRM Ontology[J]. Journal of Archival Organization, 2011(9):174-207.
[20] Bardi Alessia, Isaac Antoine, Rudersdorf Amy et al. Report on task force on EDM mappings,refinements and extensions[R/OL].(2014-12-12)[2020-07-07]. https://pro-beta.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/EuropeanaTech/EuropeanaTech_taskforces/Mapping_Refinement_Extension/EDM%20%20Mapping%20refinement%20extension%20Report.pdf.
[1] 徐彤阳,顾婷婷. 信息空间理论视域下LAM参与灾难记忆再生产的路径和策略研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2022, 36(3): 91-99.
[2] 王巧玲. 美国林肯总统图书馆与博物馆融合服务创新实践及借鉴意义[J]. 档案学研究, 2020, 34(1): 126-130.
[3] 孙逊, 于英香, 孙安. 人物档案多级著录应用研究—— 以上海交通大学钱学森图书馆特藏“629袋”为例[J]. 档案学研究, 2019, 33(4): 66-71.
[4] 赵生辉朱学芳. 数字社会记忆资源跨机构聚合机制研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2014, 28(2): 34-37.
[5] 蒋冠. 国家综合档案馆馆藏资源建设策略探析[J]. 档案学研究, 2011, 25(5): 37-41.
[6] . XML技术在档案信息化建设中的应用[J]. 档案学研究, 2006, 20(3): 35-38.