基于比较法视域的美澳法俄涉密档案法律规制及启示

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.06.009

档案学研究

2021, Vol. 35

Issue (6): 58-63 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.06.009

档案法规标准

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

基于比较法视域的美澳法俄涉密档案法律规制及启示

孙大东, 白路浩

郑州大学信息管理学院郑州 450001

Legal Regulation and Enlightenment of Classified Archives in the United States, Australia, France and Russia from the Perspective of Comparative Method

SUN Dadong, BAI Luhao

School of Information Management,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001

输出:BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要: 新《档案法》在涉密档案方面的规定变动较大,相配套的档案法规在修改时也应相应变动。本文应用比较法的思维,对美国、澳大利亚、法国和俄罗斯四国涉密档案的规定从涉密档案负责人、涉密档案范围、涉密档案保密期限与解密程序、涉密档案申诉利用等四个方面展开了比较研究,并在此基础上提出了明确涉密档案规制范围、完善保密期限划分、优化定密解密流程、开设申诉利用渠道等方面的启示和措施,以为我国有关档案法规的修改提供参考。

Abstract：The provisions of the new Archives Law on confidential archives have changed a lot, and the corresponding archives laws and regulations should also be changed when they are revised. Based on the thinking of comparative method, this paper makes a comparative study on the regulations of classified archives in the United States, Australia, France and Russia from four aspects：the person in charge of classified archives, the scope of classified archives, the confidentiality period and decryption procedure of classified archives, and the appeal to use classified archives. On this basis, the authors put forward some suggestions and measures, such as clarifying the regulatory scope of classified archives, improving the division of confidentiality period, optimizing the process of determining and declassifying secrets, and opening channels for appeal utilization, so as to provide reference for the revision of relevant archives laws and regulations in China.

出版日期: 2021-12-16

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

孙大东, 白路浩. 基于比较法视域的美澳法俄涉密档案法律规制及启示[J]. 档案学研究, 2021, 35(6): 58-63.
SUN Dadong, BAI Luhao. Legal Regulation and Enlightenment of Classified Archives in the United States, Australia, France and Russia from the Perspective of Comparative Method. Archives Science Study, 2021, 35(6): 58-63.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.06.009 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2021/V35/I6/58

[1] [15] 北大法宝. 中华人民共和国档案法(2020修订)[EB/OL].[2021-01-23]. https://www.pkulaw.com/chl/cca47f38603e6b10bdfb.html.
[2] 曹宇. 新《保密法》对涉密档案工作的影响[J]. 档案学研究,2011(1):35-38.
[3] 黄兰. 中美档案解密制度的比较研究[J]. 档案学通讯,2015(2):76-80.
[4] [17] 肖秋会. 俄罗斯档案立法:档案解密、开放和利用进展[J]. 中国档案,2016(3):77-79.
[5] 张臻. 美国档案解密管理:制度、实践及启示[J]. 档案学研究,2019(1):114-121.
[6] [7][8][10][11][12][13][14][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] 国家档案局政策法规研究司. 境外国家和地区档案法律法规选编[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2017:7,198,279,7,15,196,288-290,342,140-152,181-200,288-290,342,149,199-208,290,342-343.
[9] 北大法宝. 中华人民共和国保守国家秘密法(2010修订)[EB/OL].[2021-01-23]. https://www.pkulaw.com/chl/64aaf242e65550f4bdfb.html.
[16] 兰台拾遗. 什么是涉密档案[EB/OL].[2021-01-24].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/xhqC4kOvY3KileIoDE1iaw.
[26] 陆国强. 推动档案事业在高质量发展轨道上迈出坚实步伐—在2020年全国档案局长馆长会议上的报告[EB/OL].[2021-01-24].http://www.bjroit.com/news/689-cn.html.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed