新《档案法》档案权属的立法缺陷及影响—以企业档案管理为视角

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.06.007

档案学研究

2021, Vol. 35

Issue (6): 47-51 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.06.007

档案法规标准

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

新《档案法》档案权属的立法缺陷及影响—以企业档案管理为视角

孙军

扬州大学社会发展学院扬州 225002

The Legislative Defects and Influence of Archival Ownership in the New Archives Law—From the Perspective of Business Archives Management

SUN Jun

School of Social Development,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225002

输出:BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要: 档案权属原则及界定规则是健全档案法律制度的法理基础,是制定档案管理措施的逻辑前提。当前在我国企业所有制经济结构快速调整过程中,档案权属的确立能够及时定分止争,保护权利人的档案权益,促进档案效用得到最大程度的发挥。新《档案法》沿袭了旧法的思路,规避了档案的权属立法,实施中不仅会弱化档案管理举措的实效,也与档案司法保护制度衔接不畅,难以支撑《档案法》域外适用效力的实现。因此,明确档案的权属主体原则、建立档案权属界定规则,并依托档案权属扩展档案法律的域外适用效力是档案法律制度完善的必然选择。

Abstract：The principle of archival ownership and the rules of delimitation are the legal basis of sound archives legal system and the logical premise of formulating archive management measures. In the current process of rapid adjustment of the economic structure of enterprise ownership, the establishment of archival ownership can timely determine the division and end the disputes, protect the rights and interests of the right holders, and promote the maximum effectiveness of the archives. Like the original law,the new Archives Law circumvents the archival ownership legislation. It will not only weaken the effectiveness of archives management measures, but also have poor connection with the archives judicial protection system, even make it more difficult to support the realization of the extraterritorial application effect of the Archives Law. Therefore, it is an inevitable choice to perfect the archives legal system to clarify the principle of the subject of archival ownership, establish the rules for definition the archival ownership, and expand extraterritorial application of the Archives Law based on archival ownership.

出版日期: 2021-12-16

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

孙军. 新《档案法》档案权属的立法缺陷及影响—以企业档案管理为视角[J]. 档案学研究, 2021, 35(6): 47-51.
SUN Jun. The Legislative Defects and Influence of Archival Ownership in the New Archives Law—From the Perspective of Business Archives Management. Archives Science Study, 2021, 35(6): 47-51.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.06.007 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2021/V35/I6/47

[1] 中国档案报. 新修订的《中华人民共和国档案法》解读.[EB/OL].[2020-11-10]. https://www.saac.gov.cn/daj/yaow/202007/bd61bfb7b1404b2ca3c12f1652b2c915.shtml.
[2] 徐琳,王和民. 行政法视角下的档案立法探讨[J]. 档案学通讯,2020(5):85-90.
[3] 郭广辉,王利军. 我国所有权制度的变迁与重构[M]. 北京:中国检察出版社,2005:103.
[4] 闫崎峰,等. 全国工商联发布2018中国民营企业500强名单[EB/OL].[2020-11-10].http://news.china.com.cn/2018-08/29/content_60898264.htm.
[5] 市场观察. 2019年国企混合所有制改革的趋势与特点[EB/OL].[2020-11-10].https://xueqiu.com/6006420716/132628971.
[6] 证券时报网. 发改委:第四批国企混改名单将有约160家企业[EB/OL].[2020-11-10].https://money.163.com/19/0517/10/EFCF4A5V002580S6.html.
[7] 仝其宪. 论档案执法司法的有效衔接[J]. 档案与建设,2019(8):33-36.
[8] 中国企业联合会,中国企业家协会. 2019中国100大跨国公司榜单[EB/OL].[2020-11-10]. https://baike.baidu.com/item/2019%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD100%E5%A4%A7%E8%B7%A8%E5%9B%BD%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8%E6%A6%9C%E5%8D%95/23738247?fr=aladdin.
[9] 游天龙. 中美审计风波[EB/OL].[2020-11-10].http://www.ifengweekly.com/detil.php?id=823.
[10] 张茉楠. 数字主权下的全球跨境数字流动规则博弈[EB/OL].[2020-11-10].http://www.china-cer.com.cn/jinrongkeji/202008097288.html.
[11] 中国档案报. 《中华人民共和国档案法》修订草案(送审稿)[EB/OL].[2020-11-10]. http://jda.cq.gov.cn/gzdt/wzxw/wbxx/46342.htm.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed