情报科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 153-162.

• 博士论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国公共文化服务可及性提升机制研究
——基于政策文本的扎根分析

  

  • 出版日期:2023-08-01 发布日期:2023-08-22

  • Online:2023-08-01 Published:2023-08-22

摘要:

【目的/意义】可及性理论内涵多见于我国政策与公共文化服务实践,但其提法并未普及。推广可及性理
念,构建公共文化服务可及性理论,对我国文化事业发展有重要理论价值。【方法/过程】研究收集近年来我国重要
的公共文化服务政策,对政策文本使用扎根编码进行分析,通过开放式编码、主轴编码和选择性编码的结果建立模
型,阐释可及性提升的机制,建立实现公共文化服务可及性提升的理论框架。【结果/结论】扩大供给、优化资源与服
务配置布局、创新服务模式、推动标准化建设是提升可及性的主要途径,归纳其实质是量与质、个性与共性、时空以
及要素与系统的统一,并提出发展策略。【创新/局限】研究使用扎根方法,以我国政策文本为视角去研究可及性理
论,相对于用论文分析或问卷调查方法研究该理论,有一定创新性。研究提出可及性提高的机制和发展建议,对完
善可及性理论体系有一定启发。局限是样本数量小,仅从政策文本分析,视域过于宏观。

Abstract:

【Purpose/significance】 Although the connotation of the accessibility theory is often conducted in China's policy and prac⁃
tice of public cultural services, its formulation is not universal. The promotion of the concept of accessibility and the construction of
the theory of accessibility of public cultural services are of great importance.【Method/process】 Research collects main public cultural service policies in China in recent years, analyzes policy texts by rooted codes, sorting out the mechanism for improving accessibility by model based on open coding, spindle coding and selective coding, and establishing a theoretical framework for realizing the accessi⁃bility of public cultural services.【Result/conclusion】 The main ways to achieve accessibility are to expand supply, optimize the alloca⁃tion and layout of resources and services, innovate service models and promote standardization construction, substance of which is the unity of quantity and quality, individuality and commonness, time and space, and elements and systems, then development strategies are put forward.【Innovation/limitation】 The research uses a grounded method to study the accessibility theory from the perspective of China's policy text,innovated compared with paper analysis or questionnaire survey. The research puts forward the mechanism and de⁃velopment suggestions for improving accessibility, which has inspiration for improving the theoretical system. The limitation is that the number of samples is small and the scope is too macro only from the policy text analysis.