情报科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 69-77.

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于元分析的网络健康信息可信度影响因素研究

  

  • 出版日期:2023-09-01 发布日期:2023-10-07

  • Online:2023-09-01 Published:2023-10-07

摘要: 【 目的/意义】针对现有网络健康信息可信度影响因素的实证研究中所存在的结果不一致问题,对该领域研 究进行分析研究。【方法/过程】筛选 35篇符合标准的文献,将 14个影响因素、66个效应量纳入元分析,探究影响因 素及其强度,探讨国内外文化背景和信息类别两个维度对网络健康信息可信度影响因素的调节效应。【结果/结论】 结果表明,9个因素对网络健康信息可信度有显著影响,其中强相关影响因素有信息框架、网站外观、信息内容可信 度。同时,本文结果验证了国内外文化背景、信息类别对网络健康信息可信度影响因素具有调节作用。【创新/局 限】本研究使用元分析梳理分析了前人的研究,一定程度上解决了不一致问题,但由于符合元分析研究标准的文献 过少,纳入的影响因素不足以全面解释各个因素的作用。

Abstract: 【Purpose/significance】Aiming at the inconsistency problem of empirical results in the literature on the influencing factors of online health information credibility, this paper analyzes the relevant empirical research.【Method/process】Select 35 documents that meet the research standards for meta-analysis, incorporate 14 influencing factors and 66 effect sizes into meta-analysis, explore the in⁃ fluencing factors and their intensity, and explore the moderating effect of domestic and foreign cultural background and information category on the factors affecting the credibility of online health information【. Result/conclusion】The results show that 9 factors have a significant impact on the online health information credibility, among which the strong related factors are the information framework, website appearance and Information content credibility. At the same time, the results of this paper verify that the cultural background and information category can moderate the factors affecting the online health information credibility.【 Innovation/limitation】This study uses meta-analysis to comb and analyze the research of predecessors, which partially solves the problem of inconsistency. However, due to the lack of literature that meets the meta-analysis research standards,influencing factors are insufficient, and the effect of each factor cannot be fully explained.