情报科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 85-92.

• 业务研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

质性研究方法在档案学领域的应用分析与启示 

  

  • 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-08-05

  • Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-08-05

摘要: 目的/意义】了解档案学质性研究方法的应用,促进档案学研究的“科学化”及对自身方法论体系的改进与
反思,有利于推动图情档一体化发展。【方法
/过程】研究基于档案学两本 CSSCI期刊,构建内容分析编码表进行人
工编码与分析。【结果
/结论】结果表明:案例研究法、历史研究法是我国档案学质性研究方法体系的核心,单一方
法应用占主流;
各质性研究方法呈现差异化的应用过程,方法应用内部存在不均衡性;质性研究主题多样,部
分研究主题与研究方法之间存在一定的对应关系;
现象描述、对策建议类研究的实践贡献突出,理论贡献略显不
足。在此基础上从方法体系构建及图情档一体化发展等角度提出了研究启示。【创新
/局限】采用内容分析法系统
梳理了质性研究方法在档案学两本核心期刊中的应用状况,但样本量及样本选取范围有待扩充。

Abstract: Purpose/significanceThis paper aims to understand the application of qualitative research methods in archival science,pro⁃mote the "scientization" of archival research,improve and reflect on our own methodology system,which will be conducive to the inte⁃gration of library science,information science and archival science. Method/processBased on two CSSCI journals of archival science,a content analysis coding table is constructed for manual coding and analysis.Result/conclusionThe results show that:① the case study and historical research method dominant the qualitative research method system of archival science, and a single research method is the most widely used;②the application process of various qualitative research methods is diverse and internally unbalanced;③qualitative research topics are various,some of which have corresponding relationships with research methods;④the practical contri⁃
bution of the research on phenomenon description and countermeasures and suggestions is prominent,while the theoretical contribution is insufficient.On this basis,the research enlightenments are put forward from method system construction and discipline integration.
Innovation/limitationThe content analysis method is used to systematically sort out the application of qualitative research methods in the two CSSCI journals of archival science,but the sample size and sample selection scope need to be expanded.