Abstract: 【Purpose/significance】Study the characteristics of Chinese humanities and social sciences retracted papers, promote the standardized publication of Chinese humanities and social sciences, and provide strategies for preventing and curing academic miscon⁃duct【. Method/process】Through the method of statistical analysis, content analysis and portrait, the Bibliometric and retracted char⁃acteristics of 103 retracted papers are analyzed by portrait.【Result/conclusion】The phenomenon of retraction is widespread in the field of humanities and social sciences, and the withdrawal process is not standardized. Academic misconduct is the main reason for re⁃tracting papers, and the behavior is more hidden; The main way to discover academic misconduct is readers' reporting, and the han⁃
dling of revocation is lack of follow-up accountability. The paper is still producing academic influence after being withdrawn; Finally,the paper puts forward some suggestions to strengthen the ethical construction of periodicals and standardize the withdrawal of manu⁃scripts from Chinese periodicals. Pay attention to the prevention and screening of recessive academic misconduct; Multi-department joint academic misconduct accountability; Suggestions on strengthening the management of revocation papers in database.【Innovation/limitation】Focusing on the retracted papers in the field of Chinese humanities and social sciences, the characteristics of the retracted papers were depicted and corresponding suggestions were put forward. At present, there are few retracted papers in this field, which
makes the research results have some limitations.