情报科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 10-14.

• 专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

论文作者数能用来作为期刊评价指标吗? ——兼谈作者数与被引频次关系悖论

  

  • 出版日期:2021-07-16 发布日期:2021-07-16

  • Online:2021-07-16 Published:2021-07-16

摘要: 【目的/意义】论文作者数与被引频次关系问题是个传统问题,研究结论一直存在争议,本文试图结束这种
讨论。【方法/过程】在对作者数与被引频次关系进行理论分析的基础上,提出作者数影响因子的概念,以2019-2020
版CSSCI经济学期刊为例,基于中国知网引文数据库,综合采用回归分析、分位数回归、单因素方差分析进行研
究。【结果/结论】科研合作并不意味着作者数越多论文影响力越大;被引频次与论文作者数无关,不同作者数的作
者数影响因子有显著差异,前者从微观视角考察,后者从宏观视角考察,两者并不矛盾;关于被引频次与作者数关
系的研究方法有待改善。【创新/局限】进一步研究有待采用更多学科数据进行检验。

Abstract: 【Purpose/significance】The relationship between the number of authors and the citation frequency is a traditional issue,
and research conclusions have been controversial, this article attempts to end this discussion.【Method/process】Based on the theoreti?cal analysis of the relationship between the number of authors and the citation frequency, this paper puts forward the concept of impact factor of the number of authors. Taking the 2019-2020 version of the CSSCI Economics Journal as an example, based on the CNKI ci? tation database, regression analysis, quantile regression and one-way ANOVA are used to study comprehensively.【Result/conclusion】The results show: Scientific research cooperation does not mean that the more authors, the greater the impact of the paper; the citation frequency has nothing to do with the number of authors. There are significant differences in the impact factor of the number of authors with different numbers of authors. The former is viewed from a microscopic perspective, and the latter is viewed from a macroscopic perspective. The two are not contradictory.【Innovation/limitation】The research method on the relationship between the citation fre? quency and the number of authors needs to be improved