中国古代档案管理中存在明确的档案原件意识——以宋代为中心兼与蒋卫荣先生商榷<sup>[11]</sup>

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2017.03.003

档案学研究

2017, Vol. 31

Issue (3): 17-21 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2017.03.003

基础理论研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

中国古代档案管理中存在明确的档案原件意识——以宋代为中心兼与蒋卫荣先生商榷^[11]

钟文荣

福建师范大学社会历史学院福州 350007

The Notion of Original is Clearly Existed in Chinese Ancient Archival Management ——Focusing on the Song Dynasty and also Discussing with Mr. JIANG Weirong

Wenrong ZHONG

College of Society and History, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007

全文:

HTML

PDF(569 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要:

通过对宋代相关文献的分析,我们认为：宋代档案原件意识是明确的,在多数场合下都是受到重视和强调的。首先,这一意识表现为宋代档案工作中存在与“原件”相关的名词,这些名词分别是：“元本”“正本”“底本”及“真本”。其次,这一意识表现为在宋代档案工作中皇命文书和官文书都需按要求保管原件。最后,这一意识表现为档案原件在信息的核验、诉讼和国土争端得以广泛利用并发挥着证据价值。以宋代相关史实为基础,进而我们相信传统档案管理中“档案原件”意识的确立时间应大大早于已有研究者所提出的“近代以后”。

关键词 ：档案原件, 宋代, 正本

Abstract：

According to the analysis on the relative documents of the Song dynasty,we believe that the notion of archival original in the Song dynasty was concrete, and it was specially emphasized in most cases. Firstly,the notion embodied that some words had existed in archival work which were connected with the meaning of the original,those were“original copy”,“reserved copy”,“master copy”and“true copy”. Secondly,the notion embodied that all the records should be preserved the original in the archives of Song dynasty, including the emperor’s records and the official records. Lastly, the notion embodied that the records kept in archives were widely used in information examination,in trail and in the conflict of territory. On the basis of all mentioned above,we also make a conclusion that the creating time of the notion of the original should be more earlier than the time which some researcher has put forward “modern times later”.

Key words： a rchival original the Song Dynasty reserved copy

出版日期: 2017-11-21

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

钟文荣. 中国古代档案管理中存在明确的档案原件意识——以宋代为中心兼与蒋卫荣先生商榷^[11][J]. 档案学研究, 2017, 31(3): 17-21.
Wenrong ZHONG. The Notion of Original is Clearly Existed in Chinese Ancient Archival Management ——Focusing on the Song Dynasty and also Discussing with Mr. JIANG Weirong. Archives Science Study, 2017, 31(3): 17-21.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2017.03.003 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2017/V31/I3/17

[1]	蒋卫荣.历史上档案管理目标价值与原件概念衍变[J].档案学研究,2014(5):25,24.
[2]	蒋卫荣.历史上档案管理目标价值与原件概念衍变[J].档案学研究,2014(5):25,24.
[3]	徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243.
[4]	许慎. 说文解字[M].北京:中华书局,2013:1.
[5]	戴侗. 六书故[M].北京:中华书局,2012:3,158.
[6]	徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243.
[7]	李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817.
[8]	李心传. 建炎以来系年要录[M].影印文渊阁四库全书本.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983:883.
[9]	李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817.
[10]	李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817.
[11]	李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817.
[12]	岳珂,王曾瑜校注.鄂国金佗稡编校注[M].北京:中华书局,1989:1123
[13]	周必大. 文忠集[M].影印文渊阁四库全书本.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983:135.
[14]	戴侗. 六书故[M].北京:中华书局,2012:3,158.
[15]	徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243.
[16]	徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243.
[17]	李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817.
[18]	谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305.
[19]	龚延明. 宋代官制辞典[M].北京:中华书局,1997:88.
[20]	李元弼. 作邑自箴[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:141,148.
[21]	李元弼. 作邑自箴[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:141,148.
[22]	谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305.
[23]	谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305.
[24]	谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305.
[25]	王金玉. 宋代档案管理研究[M].北京:中国档案出版社,1997:105.
[26]	徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243.
[27]	谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305.
[28]	徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243.
[29]	谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305.
[30]	李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817.
[31]	徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243.
[32]	徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243.
[33]	徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243.
[34]	徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243.
[35]	徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243.
[36]	佚名.名公书判清明集[M].北京:中华书局,1987:85,102,115,154,155.
[37]	佚名.名公书判清明集[M].北京:中华书局,1987:85,102,115,154,155.
[38]	佚名.名公书判清明集[M].北京:中华书局,1987:85,102,115,154,155.
[39]	佚名.名公书判清明集[M].北京:中华书局,1987:85,102,115,154,155.
[40]	佚名.名公书判清明集[M].北京:中华书局,1987:85,102,115,154,155.
[41]	王铚. 默记[M].北京:中华书局,1981:14.
[42]	王铚. 默记[M].北京:中华书局,1981:14.
[43]	叶隆礼. 契丹国志[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1985:90.
[44]	叶隆礼. 契丹国志[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1985:90.
[45]	郑玄,贾公彦.周礼注疏[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1990:517,533.
[46]	郑玄,贾公彦.周礼注疏[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1990:517,533.

[1]	王云庆, 高雪华. 宋代科技档案的分类标准与基本体系[J]. 档案学研究, 2020, 34(5): 143-148.
[2]	钟文荣. 宋代文书档案违法的行政处罚研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2020, 34(2): 138-142.
[3]	丁海斌, 史梦茜. “正本”一词之起源及古今演变研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2019, 33(5): 4-9.
[4]	刘江. “备录行遣”：公文副本与宋代地方政务信息传递[J]. 档案学研究, 2019, 33(4): 136-144.
[5]	杨军. 宋代中央百司及地方官府榜文文书的发布规定[J]. 档案学研究, 2019, 33(1): 122-125.
[6]	杨军. 宋代榜文文书发布中的违规现象初探[J]. 档案学研究, 2017, 31(6): 125-128.
[7]	张若楠. 从宋代文化对图书档案事业发展的影响[J]. 档案学研究, 2016, 30(4): 73-76.
[8]	. 关于文件正本与定稿问题的再思考[J]. 档案学研究, 2003, 17(3): 29-31.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed