文件连续体理论核心术语解析—— 兼论我国档案学语境下的误读

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2020.03.004

档案学研究

2020, Vol. 34

Issue (3): 25-31 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2020.03.004

基础理论研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

文件连续体理论核心术语解析—— 兼论我国档案学语境下的误读

吕文婷

南京大学信息管理学院南京 210023

Analysis of the Core Terminologies of Records Continuum Theory—— Additional Discussion on Misreading in the Context of Chinese Archival Science

LV Wenting

School of Information Management, Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023

输出:BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要: 20世纪90年代,以弗兰克·阿普沃德为代表的澳大利亚连续体理论者吸收安东尼·吉登斯的结构化理论思想,正式提出多维、动态、宏观的文件连续体理论,这使得从实践中总结出的连续体方法进一步升华为具有时空结构的概念模型。它已经超出了官方文档管理实践的范围,高度概括了人类社会中的一切records管理行为。因此,文件连续体模型中文件保管形式轴上对应四个维度的坐标(Archival)document、Record(s)、Archive和Archives也被赋予了与管理实践不同的概念内涵。本文在正确理解这四个核心术语的基础上,指出我国档案界仅从档案管理实践角度理解文件连续体理论是十分片面的,偏离了其核心思想,是对文件连续体理论的误读。具体而言,这种误读体现在对“连续体”概念、文件连续体理论、文件生命周期理论和文件运动规律的关系理解等方面。

Abstract：In the 1990s, Australian continuum theorists, represented by Frank Upward, absorbing the structuration theory of Anthony Giddens, proposed the multidimensional, dynamic and macroscopic records continuum theory, which further sublimated the continuum method summarized from practice into a conceptual model with space-time structure. It is beyond the scope of official records and archives management practices and highly summarizes recordkeeping behavior in human society of all forms. Therefore, the four coordinates, which are (Archival)document, Record(s), Archive, and Archives on the axis of recordkeeping containers in the records continuum model are endowed with different conceptual connotations from practice. Based on the correct understanding of four core terms, this paper points out that it is insufficient to understand the records continuum theory only from the perspective of Chinese archival management practice, which deviates from its theoretical idea of continuum. Specifically, the misinterpretation is reflected in the understanding of concept of “continuum”, the relationship between the records continuum theory and both the records life cycle theory and the law of records movement.

出版日期: 2020-06-09

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

吕文婷. 文件连续体理论核心术语解析—— 兼论我国档案学语境下的误读[J]. 档案学研究, 2020, 34(3): 25-31.
LV Wenting. Analysis of the Core Terminologies of Records Continuum Theory—— Additional Discussion on Misreading in the Context of Chinese Archival Science. Archives Science Study, 2020, 34(3): 25-31.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2020.03.004 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2020/V34/I3/25

[1] 安小米.文件连续体模式对电子文件最优化管理的启示[J].档案学通讯,2002(3):52-55.
[2] 于英香.电子文件研究方法论转向[J].档案学通讯,2008(4):54-57.
[3] 章燕华.文件生命周期理论与文件连续体理论之争——中外档案界认识差异及原因剖析[J].档案与建设,2006(2):12-14.
[4] 王岚.文件还是档案—— 为records正名[J].档案学研究,2009(5):13-16.
[5] 侯衡.Records翻译之争—— 在电子时代的重新思考[J].档案学通讯,2016(3):28-33.
[6] 吕颜冰.Record(s)与Archive(s)的关系及其使用差异[J].浙江档案,2016(8):22-25.
[7] 观海听涛,裴煜.多维视角下records的内涵分析及翻译研究[J].档案学通讯,2018(1):33-38.
[8][29][34][38] 冯惠玲,张辑哲][29][34][38] 冯惠玲,张辑哲.档案学概论(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001:268-269.
[9] Sue McKemmish,Frank Upward. The Archival Document:A Submission to the Inquiry into Australia as an Information Society] Sue McKemmish,Frank Upward. The Archival Document:A Submission to the Inquiry into Australia as an Information Society[J]. Archives and Manuscripts, 1999, 19(1):17-31.
[10][17][18][19][20][21][26] Sue McKemmish,Michael Piggott,Barbara Reed,Frank Upward. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society[M]. Wagga Wagga NSW Australia:Centre for Information Studies,Charles Sturt University.2005:76,102,107,113,137-143,150, 154,157.
[11] Frank Upward,Barbara Reed,Gillian Oliver,Joanne Evans.Recordkeeping informatics for a networked age[M]. Clayton,Victoria:Monash University Publishing, 2018:53.
[12] Sue McKemmish. Are Records Ever Actual?[M]// Sue McKemmish,Michael Piggott. The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years. Clayton:Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives,1994:200.
[13][16] Frank Upward,Sue McKemmish. In Search of the Lost Tiger by way of Sainte-Beuve:Reconstructing the Possibilities in‘Evidence of Me..’[J]. Archives and Manuscripts, 2001,29(1):22-43.
[22] 陈智为,邓绍兴,刘越男.档案管理学(第三版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:131-135
[23] 吕颜冰.文件系列:一种后保管的档案整理与编目方法[J].档案学通讯,2015(5):87-93.
[24] Terry Cook. What is Past is Prologue:A History of Archival Ideas Since1898,and the Future Paradigm Shift[J]. Archivaria,1997(43):17-63.
[25][33][36] Sue McKemmish,Frank Upward,Barbara Reed3][36] Sue McKemmish,Frank Upward,Barbara Reed. Records Continuum Model[M]// Marcia J. Bates,Mary Niles Maack. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences,Third Edition. Boca Raton,FL: CRC Press,2009:4447-4459.
[27] 林奇秀. 记录连续体理论浅析[J].图书咨询学刊,2007,5(1&2):107-137.
[30] Ian Maclean.Australian Experience in Record and Archives Management[J]. American Archivist,1959,22(4):387-418.
[31] Frank Upward.In Search of the Continuum: Ian Maclean’s‘Australian Experience’Essays on Recordkeeping[M]//Sue McKemmish,Michael Piggott. The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives’First Fifty Years. Clayton,Australia:Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives,1994:110-130.
[32] Frank Upward.Structuring the Records Continuum part Two:Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping[J]. Archives and Manuscripts,1997,25(1):10-35.
[35] 张宁. 电子文件保管模式之争[J].浙江档案,2000(8):42-43.
[37] Sue McKemmish.Yesterday,Today and Tomorrow:A Continuum of Responsibility[EB/OL].[2019-04-29]. http://staging-infotech.monash.edu.au/research/groups/rcrg/publications/recordscontinuum-smckp2.html.
[39] 何嘉荪,叶鹰.文件连续体理论与文件生命周期理论—— 文件运动理论研究之一[J].档案学通讯,2003(5):60-64.
[40] 傅荣校,王相华.源于两种不同认识基础的理论—— 文件生命周期理论与文件连续体理论比较研究之一[J].档案学通讯,2004(3):19-22.
[41] 傅荣校,王相华.理论核心问题:原则与内容—— 文件生命周期理论与文件连续体理论比较研究之二[J].档案学通讯,2004(4):18-21.
[42] 傅荣校. 替代或不可替代关系—— 文件生命周期理论与文件连续体理论比较研究之三[J].档案学通讯,2004(5):19-23.
[43] 章燕华. “水火不容”还是“和平共处”—— 再论文件生命周期理论和文件连续体理论的优劣之争[J].档案学通讯,2006(2):47-49.
[44] 邹吉辉. 文件生命周期理论与文件连续体理论研究现状评析[J].档案与建设,2004(8):8-9,23.
[45] 何嘉荪,傅荣校.文件运动规律研究: 从新角度审视档案学基础理论[M].北京:中国档案出版社,1999:7.
[46] 吴品才. 国外电子文件运动情形异常现象综述及特征分析[J].浙江档案,2010(6):24-28.
[47] 黄世. 科技文件形成主体及运动状态的变化趋势[J].北京档案,2004(7):28-29.
[48] 译自2019年2月14日笔者与弗兰克·阿普沃德和苏·迈克米希的访谈记录.
[49] 王英玮,金凡.记录连续体的构成要素内涵与创新研究[J].档案学研究,2019(1):4-10.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed