记忆或是遗忘：档案事业如何应对被遗忘权的挑战?

Please wait a minute...

档案学研究

2021, Vol. 35

Issue (6): 64-71 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.06.010

档案法规标准

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

|

记忆或是遗忘：档案事业如何应对被遗忘权的挑战?

余昊哲

安徽大学法学院合肥 230601

Remember or Forget: How does the Archival Undertaking Respond to the Right to be Forgotten?

YU Haozhe

School of Law,Anhui University,Hefei 230601

输出:BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要: 现代信息技术的应用促进档案信息化建设快速发展,档案所固有的社会记忆功能得以充分发挥,并推动了社会记忆的数字化进程,从而不可避免地与被遗忘权产生冲突。起源和发展于欧陆地区的被遗忘权,旨在擦除过时、失真的个人信息,用以回应数字化记忆带来的遗忘难题,但鉴于被遗忘权对档案事业的潜在影响,该项权利的推展受到了欧洲档案界的冷遇。从中国实际出发,我国引入被遗忘权具有现实可能性,而调和档案事业与被遗忘权之间的张力,需要运用利益衡量的方法,并根据衡量结果将档案事业区分为保管和利用两个层次,档案保管应超然于被遗忘权的行使,档案利用可以有限制地适用被遗忘权,从而就档案信息所关联的社会历史进行智慧记忆和遗忘。

Abstract：The application of modern information technology promotes the rapid development of archives informatization, gives full play to the inherent social memory function of archives, and promotes the digitalization process of social memory, which inevitably conflicts with the right to be forgotten. Originated and developed in Europe, the right to be forgotten aims to erase the "inadequate, irrelevant and excessive" personal data in response to the forgetting problem brought by digital memory. However, in view of the potential influence of the right to be forgotten on archival undertaking, the promotion of this right has received a cold reception from the European archival circles. According to China's reality, it is possible to introduce the right to be forgotten into China. To resolve the conflict between archival undertaking and the right to be forgotten, it is necessary to adhere to the interest balance. By using the interest balance method based on information lifecycle, archival undertaking can be divided into two levels: preservation and utilization. Archives preservation should be detached from the exercise of the right to be forgotten, and archives utilization can apply the right to be forgotten in a limited way, thus intelligently remembering and forgetting the social history associated with archival information.

出版日期: 2021-12-16

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

余昊哲. 记忆或是遗忘：档案事业如何应对被遗忘权的挑战?[J]. 档案学研究, 2021, 35(6): 64-71.
YU Haozhe. Remember or Forget: How does the Archival Undertaking Respond to the Right to be Forgotten?. Archives Science Study, 2021, 35(6): 64-71.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.06.010 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2021/V35/I6/64

[1] 赵跃. 大数据时代档案数据化的前景展望:意义与困境[J]. 档案学研究,2019(5):52-60.
[2] 杨智勇. 由原始记忆走向智慧记忆—论档案记忆功能的历史演变及其未来趋势[J]. 档案学通讯,2014(5):14-17.
[3] 龙家庆,聂云霞. 数字记忆建构视域下档案文化创意服务模式探析[J]. 档案学通讯,2020(5):68-76.
[4] MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER V. Delete:the Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age[M]. Princeton :Princeton University Press,2011:3.
[5] Chris Conley.The Right to Delete[C].AAAl Spring Symposium:Intelligent Information Privacy Management,2010:53-57.
[6] 注:英文为“personal data”,由于翻译和使用习惯等原因,我国学界或称之为个人信息,或称之为个人数据,本文为使表述更具融贯性,除官方机构和官方文件的名称以外,全部使用个人信息的概念.
[7] 薛丽. GDPR生效背景下我国被遗忘权确立研究[J]. 法学论坛,2019(2):100-109.
[8] Meg Leta Ambrose,Jef Ausloos.The Right to Be Forgotten Across the Pond[J]. Journal of Information Policy,2013:31-23.
[9] [10] Position of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)[EB/OL].[2020-11-23].https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CONSIL:ST_5419_2016_INIT&from=EN.
[11] 满洪杰. 被遗忘权的解析与构建:作为网络时代信息价值纠偏机制的研究[J]. 法制与社会发展,2018 (2):199-217.
[12] George Brock.The Right to be Forgotten:Privacy and the Media in the Digital Age[M]. I.B.Tauris & Co.Ltd,2016:86.
[13] 冯惠玲,张辑哲. 档案学概论[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001:57-59.
[14] 吕和顺. 信息化发展给档案工作带来的挑战与机遇[J]. 北京档案,2015(1):5-7.
[15] Kristie Byrum.The European Right to be Forgotten: A Challenge to the United States Constitution's First Amendment and to Professional Public Relations Ethics[J].Public Relations Review,2017(3):102-111.
[16] [23][24][28] Szekely I. The Right to be Forgotten and the New Archival Paradigm[A].Alessia Ghezzi,Ângela Guimarães Pereira,Lucia Vesnić-Alujević. The Ethics of Memory in a Digital Age[C].London:Palgrave Macmillan,2014.
[17] Alysia Judge,Monkey selfies and Aboriginals:Wikipedia founder brands Google censorship "immoral"[EB/OL].(2014-08-06)[2020-12-01].https://www.itproportal.com/2014/08/06/wikipedia-jimmy-wales-right-to-be-forgotten-eu-immoral-censorship/.
[18] [德] 克里斯托夫·默勒斯. 德国基本法:历史与内容[M]. 赵真,译. 北京:中国法制出版社,2014:31.
[19] European Commission. Minutes-Joint meeting of the EAG with EBNA in Dublin,Ireland-3 April2013[EB/OL].[2020-12-03]. http://ec.europa.eu/archival-policy/docs/eag/cr/130403_minutes_en.pdf.
[20] European Commission. European Commission consultation on the Commission's comprehensive approach on data protection in the European Union (COM(2010)609 final)- Response from The National Archives of England,Wales and the United Kingdom[EB/OL].[2020-12-05]. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/news/consulting_public/0006/contributions/public_authorities/natarchives_uk_en.pdf.
[21] [22] Rosnay M. Memory Hole or Right to Delist? Implications of the Right to be Forgotten for Web Archiving[J]. Social ence Electronic Publishing,2017:6.
[25] [29] 余昊哲. 社交媒体存档与被遗忘权冲突的内在机理及调适路径[J/OL].情报理论与实践:1-12[2021-09-04]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.g3.20210628.1319.004.html.
[26] Google Spain SL v.Agencia Espa1ola de Protección de Datos(May 13,2014),INFO CURIA-CASE-LAW OFTHE COURT OF JUSTICE[EB/OL].[2020-12-05]. http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=152065&doclang=EN.
[27] 粟湘,郑建明,吴沛. 信息生命周期管理研究[J]. 情报科学,2006(5):691-696.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed