中国古代地方官府与民间诏敕文书专藏场所源流演变考述—以敕书之室为例

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.06.021

档案学研究

2021, Vol. 35

Issue (6): 143-148 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.06.021

档案史料研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

中国古代地方官府与民间诏敕文书专藏场所源流演变考述—以敕书之室为例

杨光

中国人民大学信息资源管理学院北京 100872

Textual Research on the Origin and Evolution of the Special Collection Places of Imperial Edict Documents by Local Government and Folk in Ancient China—A Study of the Imperial Edict Rooms

YANG Guang

School of Information Resource Management,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872

输出:BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要: 诏敕文书专藏之室是我国古代官方和民间档案保管场所的重要组成部分。本文通过“E考据”的方法,在搜剔爬梳古今文献的基础上,以敕体的源流演变为主线,结合特定的时代背景,考证了以“敕书”名室者在古代的存续脉络。敕书之室滥觞于唐代,是散见于内地县治和边疆寺宇的个别现象。至北宋时,宋初的建法立制改革推动了编敕制度的兴起,敕书库和敕书楼相继上升为一种普遍的地方官署档案保管场所,为地方性的专门编敕服务。南宋时,官府内部的机构改革使得敕书楼逐渐被架阁库所取代,敕书楼由官方转向民间。至明清时,敕体不再是法规形式,敕书之室的建筑主体由北宋单一的地方政府演化为官方和民间并存并逐渐以民间为主的结构。由于明代饥岁灾荒频繁而实行劝分政策和旌表制度,导致因赐敕旌义而特建楼、阁专藏的现象尤为频繁。

Abstract：The special collection room of imperial edict documents is an important part of ancient official archives and ancient folk archives retention places. Through the method of e-textual research, on the basis of searching and combing ancient and modern literature, taking the origin and evolution of the imperial edict as the main line, combining with the specific era background, this paper makes a textual research on the existence of the rooms named after "imperial edict". The imperial edicts rooms originated in the Tang Dynasty, which was an individual phenomenon scattered in interior governments and frontier temples. In the Northern Song Dynasty, the reform of the establishment of laws and regulations in the early Song Dynasty promoted the rise of the system of compiling imperial edicts. Imperial edict cabinet and imperial edict tower became a kind of common archives retention institution of local government offices, which were dedicated to the local special compiling imperial edicts. In the Southern Song Dynasty, the internal institutional reform of the government made imperial edict tower gradually replaced by Rack cabinet repository, and imperial edict tower changed from official to folk. By the Ming and Qing Dynasties, the imperial edict was no longer the form of laws and regulations. The main building body of the imperial edict rooms evolved from a single local government in the Northern Song Dynasty to a structure in which both the official and the folk coexisted, and gradually dominated by the folk. Because of the frequent famine,the policy of persuading donations and the system of recognition were implemented in Ming Dynasty, which led to the frequent phenomenon of building towers and cabinets specially for the purpose of special collection.

出版日期: 2021-12-16

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

杨光. 中国古代地方官府与民间诏敕文书专藏场所源流演变考述—以敕书之室为例[J]. 档案学研究, 2021, 35(6): 143-148.
YANG Guang. Textual Research on the Origin and Evolution of the Special Collection Places of Imperial Edict Documents by Local Government and Folk in Ancient China—A Study of the Imperial Edict Rooms. Archives Science Study, 2021, 35(6): 143-148.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.06.021 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2021/V35/I6/143

[1] 池秀云. 历代名人室名别号辞典[M]. 太原:山西古籍出版社,1998:852.
[2] 虞云国,陈江,王松龄. 宋代文化史大辞典(下册)[M].上海:汉语大辞典出版社,2006:1076.
[3] 曹之. 中国古代图书史[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2015:266.
[4] 傅荣贤. 中国古代图书馆学思想史[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2016:272-273.
[5] [11] 姜家松,钟文荣. 宋代地方档案管理机构—“敕书楼”研究[J]. 兰台世界,2017(13):110-112,110.
[6] 高雪华,王云庆. 关于两宋时期地方档案保管机构敕书楼的研究[J]. 档案管理,2020(4):43-46.
[7] 张全海. 从新发现的史料看宋代架阁库—中国古代档案管理模式研究系列[J]. 档案学通讯,2016(1):(12-16).
[8] 张全海. 西汉未央宫“兰台”得名与位置考[J]. 档案学通讯,2018(6):67-70.
[9] 张全海. “E 考据”在人文社科研究中的应用—以《永乐大典》中的“文件”为例[J]. 浙江档案,2019(6):22-25.
[10] 张全海. 中国古代御赐书专藏研究:赐书楼考[J]. 图书馆论坛,2020(5):75-81.
[12] 刘昫,等. 旧唐书(第一二册)[M]. 北京:中华书局,2013:3934-3937.
[13] [15] 脱脱,等. 宋史(第四○册)[M]. 北京:中华书局,2013:14110-14112,14109-14110.
[14] 刘昫,等. 旧唐书(第五册)[M]. 北京:中华书局,2013:1644.
[16] [20] 李焘. 续资治通鉴长编(第一册)[M]. 2版. 北京:中华书局,2008:73,74.
[17] 注:笔者查阅了上海商务印书馆的缩印明翻宋刊本《稽古录》(2006)、北京师范大学出版社的点校本《稽古录》(1988),正文中所引用为前者.
[18] 司马光. 稽古录[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2006:116-117.
[19] 毕沅. 续资治通鉴(第一册)[M]. 北京:中华书局,2008:49.
[21] [23][27] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿(第七册)[M]. 北京:中华书局,1957:6462,6462,7376.
[22] [24][29] 脱脱,等. 宋史(第一五册)[M]. 北京:中华书局,2013:4962,4962,4963.
[25] 注:这不意味着宋代的敕书楼在宋太宗时才出现.明嘉靖刻本《宁国府志》卷四:“宋时有贡院,有敕书楼,建隆中建.”
[26] [30] 王栐. 宋朝燕翼诒谋录[M]. 上海:商务印书馆,1939:34.
[28] 注:后世典籍遇此歧处,亦多据《燕翼贻谋录》而改.如《全宋文》卷六十九《诸州县所受诏敕藏敕书楼着于籍诏》(民国十四年铅印本)、《汴京遗迹志》卷三《官署二》(清文渊阁四库全书本).其他相关史料对此诏令颁发时间的记载则很模糊,并未精确到年份.如《新雕皇朝类苑卷》卷二十七(日本元和七年活字印本)只交代于六月.
[31] 王金玉. 宋代档案管理研究[M]. 北京:中国档案出版社,1997:53.
[32] 鄂州市地方志编纂委员会. 鄂州市志[M]. 北京:中华书局,2000:765.
[33] 周銮书,王伟民. 江西古文精华丛书(碑记卷)[M]. 南昌:江西人民出版社,1996:227-228.
[34] 徐弘祖. 徐霞客游记(下)[M]. 上海:上海古籍出版社,1987:1215.
[35] 俞森. 义仓考[M]. 北京:中华书局,1985:19.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed