三峡库区典型人工防护林林分结构与固碳特征

doi:10.16843/j.sswc.2023.03.015

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1715 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract [Background] Artificial vegetation construction is one of the effective measures to increase land carbon sink and slow down atmospheric CO₂ concentration. [Methods] In order to clarify the carbon sequestration effects of artificial shelter forests in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, five typical plantations including pure Cunninghamia lanceolate coniferous (L1), pure Pinus massoniana coniferous (L2), mixed coniferous forest (L3), mixed broad-leaved forest (L4), mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest (L5) were selected as the research objects, the biomass model based on stand volume and correlation analysis were used to analyze the spatial structure, carbon density and its influencing factors. [Results] 1) The 3 mixed forests in the study area were moderately mixed or above, the neighborhood comparison value ranged from 0.35 to 0.65, which was in the middle state. L2 and L3 were randomly distributed, while the other stands are in aggregate distribution. 2) The soil organic carbon of the five forest types ranged from 0.83 to 5.25 g/kg, and it was rich in L3 and L4. The carbon densities (259.13 t/hm²) of the artificial shelterbelts were up to the national average level, soil and vegetation were the main carbon sequestration modes. The carbon sequestration capacities of L2 and L5 stands were significant, and the carbon sequestration capacity of mixed forest was significantly better than that of pure forest in tree layer and litter layer. 3) The density of soil organic carbon was affected by soil bulk density and clay content, while the mingling degree, angular scale and neighborhood comparison had effects on the carbon density of tree layer. [Conclusions] The carbon sequestration function of 5 artificial shelterbelts in the study area was promising, and the stand structure may regulate the carbon sequestration function. Therefore, the function of carbon sequestration can be brought into full play by adjusting the forest spatial structure to regulate the forest land resources.

Key words： plantation stand structure carbon density soil organic carbon

Received: 01 November 2022

PACS:

S157.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHU Meifei
	CHENG Jinhua
	SHI Xueqi
	SHI Dewei
	MA Siwen

Cite this article:

ZHU Meifei,CHENG Jinhua,SHI Xueqi, et al. Characteristics of forest structure and carbon sequestration of typical artificial shelterbelts in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. SSWC, 2023, 21(3): 119-127.

URL:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/10.16843/j.sswc.2023.03.015 OR http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_stbc/EN/Y2023/V21/I3/119

[1]	WU Jianxin, KANG Zhiyong, ZHANG Ning. Carbon emission reduction potentials under different polices in Chinese cities: A scenario-based analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161: 1226.
[2]	杨友才, 牛晓童. 碳中和背景下我国重污染行业碳排放效率的溢出效应研究[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(5): 165. YANG Youcai, NIU Xiaotong. The spillover effect of carbon emission efficiency in China's heavily polluting industries under the background of carbon neutrality[J]. Journal of Shandong University, 2022(5): 165.
[3]	SHIMEL D S. Terrestrial ecosystem and the carbon cycle[J]. Global Change Biology, 1995, 1: 77.
[4]	LIN Dunmei,LAI Jiangshan, HELENE C.M, et al. Topographic variation in aboveground biomass in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in China[J]. Plos One, 2012, 7(10): e48244.
[5]	王磊,万欣,王火.江苏长江沿岸森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].江苏林业科技,2020,47(3):16. WANG Lei, WAN Xin, WANG Huo. Evaluation of ecological service of forests along the Yangtze River in Jiangsu province[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2020, 47(3): 16.
[6]	HOLTMANN A, HUTH A, POHL F, et al. Carbon sequestration in mixed deciduous forests: The influence of tree size and species composition derived from model experiments[J]. Forests, 2021, 12: 726.
[7]	DAWUD S M, RAULUND-RASMUSSEN K, DOMISCH T, et al. Is tree species diversity or species identity the more important driver of soil carbon stocks, C/N ratio, and pH?[J]. Ecosystems, 2016, 19: 645.
[8]	HANDA I T, AERTS R, BERENDSE F, et al. Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes[J]. Nature, 2014, 509: 218.
[9]	冯源, 肖文发, 朱建华, 等. 造林对区域森林生态系统碳储量和固碳速率的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(3): 281. FENG Yuan, XIAO Wenfa, ZHU Jianhua, et al. Impacts of afforestation on the carbon stocks and carbon sequestration rates of regional forest ecosystems[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020, 36(3): 281.
[10]	刘春霞. 重庆缙云山典型林分结构特征对坡面水文过程的影响[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2019:19. LIU Chunxia. Effects of structure characteristics of typical forest stands on slope hydrological processes in Jinyun Mountain, Chongqing[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2019:19.
[11]	张毅锋,汤孟平.天目山常绿阔叶林空间结构动态变化特征[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(5): 1959. ZHANG Yifeng, TANG Mengping. Analysis on spatial structure dynamic characteristics of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Tianmu Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(5): 1959.
[12]	解宪丽,孙波,周慧珍,等.中国土壤有机碳密度和储量的估算与空间分布分析[J]. 土壤学报, 2004(1): 35. XIE Xianli, SUN Bo, ZHOU Huizhen, et al. Estimation and spatial distribution of soil organic carbon density and storage in China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2004, 41(1): 35.
[13]	高美荣, 施建平, 况福虹, 等. 基于全国第二次土壤普查的四川重庆土种志数据集[J]. 中国科学数据, 2021, 6(3): 241. GAO Meirong, SHI Jianping, KUANG Fuhong, et al. A dataset of soil type in Sichuan-Chongqing based on the second national soil survey[J]. China Scientific Data. 2021, 6(3): 241.
[14]	邢乐杰. 三峡库区森林生态系统有机碳储量研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2008:43. XING Lejie. Study on organic carbon storage of forest ecosystem in Three Gorges Reservoir area[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University, 2008:43.
[15]	周玉荣, 于振良, 赵士洞. 我国主要森林生态系统碳贮量和碳平衡[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(5): 518. ZHOU Yurong, YU Zhenliang, ZHAO Shidong. Carbon storage and carbon balance in major forest ecosystems in China[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2000, 24(5): 518.
[16]	邹玉霞, 樊国中, 刘淑婧, 等. 1960—2017年重庆市不同量级降雨侵蚀力R值的时空变化特征[J].水土保持学报, 2022, 36(6): 41. ZOU Yuxia, FAN Guozhong, LIU Shujing, et al. Spatio-temporal variations of rainfall erosivity R values of different magnitudes in Chongqing from 1960 to 2017[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(6): 41.
[17]	杨德春, 胡雷, 宋小艳, 等. 降雨变化对高寒草甸不同植物功能群凋落物质量及其分解的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(12): 1314. YANG Dechun, HU Lei, SONG Xiaoyan, et al. Effects of changing precipitation on litter quality and decomposition of different plant functional groups in an alpine meadow[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2021, 45(12): 1314.
[18]	HUANG Jianjun, WANG Xihua, YAN Enrong. Leaf nutrient concentration, nutrient resorption and litter decomposition in an evergreen broad-leaved forest in eastern China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 239(1):150.
[19]	BASILE D I, BALESDENT J, PELLERIN S. Reviews and syntheses: The mechanisms underlying carbon storage in soil[J]. Biogeosciences, 2020, 17(21): 5223.
[20]	王琳琳, 陈立新, 刘振花, 等. 红松阔叶混交林不同演替阶段土壤肥力与林木生长的关系[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2008,6(4): 59. WANG Linlin, CHEN Lixin, LIU Zhenhua, et al. Relationship between soil fertility and tree growth in the broad-leaved Pinus korariensis forest at different growth periods[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 6(4): 59.
[21]	孙佳, 夏江宝, 董波涛, 等. 黄河三角洲滨海滩涂不同密度柽柳林的根系形态及生长特征[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10): 3775. SUN Jia, XIA Jiangbao, DONG Botao, et al. Root morphology and growth characteristics of Tamarix chinensis with different densities on the beach of the Yellow River Delta[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 3775.
[22]	FEI Li, HUA Yongzhang, ZHONG Yuwang, et al. The carbon sequestration of Pinus tabulaeformis forests in Shanxi province, China[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 2695(807/809): 810.