|
|
A field survey method for regional gully erosion: A case study in northeastern China |
LIU Baoyuan1, LIU Gang1, WANG Da'an1, WU Yongqiu1, DUAN Xingwu2, LI Jianwei3, SHEN Bo3, MENG Lingqin3, GAO Yan3 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, 100875, Beijing, China;
2. Institute of Natural Science at Yunnan University, 650091, Kunming, China;
3. Songliao River Water Resources Commission, the Ministry of Water Resources, 130021, Changchun, China |
|
|
Abstract [Background] The management of ephemeral gully and gully erosion relies on their survey at regional scale. The remote sensing technique is the primary method for such survey currently, which, however, is hardly able to identify ephemeral gullies or gullies of small size.[Methods] This study provided a regional gully erosion survey scheme based on the stratified unequal probability areal sampling used in the First Water Resources Census (2010-2012) for interrill and rill erosion. The main steps of the method include making a survey maps and record forms of sampling units; field survey, such as photo shooting, record form filling, survey map drawing; determination and measurement of gully section; processing and calculation of survey data; and evaluation of gully erosion intensity. This newly developed method was later applied to four counties in Northeasern China, including Liaoyang county and Zhangwu county in Liaoning province, Nenjiang county in Heilongjiang province, and Arun Banner in Inner-Monglia, covering 112 sampling units in total. The 4 counties belong to the mountain to the transition of the piedmont plain platform and hilly region.But Liaoyang is mainly in the typical hilly region, Zhangwu is mainly in the plateau to plain transition, which the platform characteristics are obvious, and Nenjiang and Arong Banner are mainly in the rolling hill region.[Results] The results showed that the densities of both ephemeral gully and gully were 1.70, 0.61, 1.51 and 5.04 km/km2 in the 4 counties, respectively, classified as the gully erosion grades of moderate, slight, moderate, and catastrophic. The numbers of both ephemeral gully and gully were 14.7, 9.3, 12.4, and 44.0 per square kilometer in the 4 counties, in which the ephemeral gullies accounted for 46.9%, 44.1%, 71.0%, and 66.1%, respectively. The volume of gully erosion were 15 195.8, 11 489.0, 1 886.5 and 14 060.2 cubic meters per square kilometer respectively, which is mainly caused by gullies. It is clearly manifested that more gullies were developed in the hilly regions like Liaoyang and Zhangwu in Liaoning province, compared to the other type, while ephemeral gullies is dominant in the rolling hill regions, such as Nenjing in Heilongjiang province and Arun Banner in Inner Mongolia. These gullies mainly appear in the cultivated lands. The proportions of the farmand varied between 23.3% and 55.5% for the 4 counties, while the numeral percentage in farmland were between 88.8% and 100% for ephemeral gullies, and between 40.1% and 99.1% for gullies. Without appropriate conservation practices, ephemeral gullies can develop into gullies in a short term.[Conclusions] It is critical to take effective actions on the gullies as well as the ephemeral gullies, especially on the cultivated areas. The method provided in this study could assess both ephemeral gully and gully erosion quantitatively and objectively for regional scale, and evaluate contributions of sheet erosion and gully erosion respectively by combining the interrill and rill survey in the same sampling unit.
|
Received: 14 November 2017
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
WU Yongqiu, ZHENG Qiuhong, ZHANG Yongguang, et al. Development of gullies and sediment production in the black soil region of northeastern China[J]. Geomorphology, 2008, 101(4):683.
|
[2] |
国务院第一次全国水利普查领导小组办公室. 第一次全国水利普查培训教材之六:水土保持情况普查[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2010:21. The first national water resources census leading group office of State Council. The first national water resources survey training textbook six:Survey of soil and water conservation[M]. Beijing:China Water & Power Press, 2010:21.
|
[3] |
中华人民共和国水利部. 第一次全国水利普查水土保持情况公报[J]. 中国水土保持, 2013, (10):2. Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. Water and soil conservation bulletin of the first national water survey[J]. Soil and water conservation in China, 2013, (10):2.
|
[4] |
王念忠,沈波. 东北黑土区侵蚀沟发展状况及其对粮食安全的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2011, 9(5):7. WANG Nianzhong, SHEN Bo. Development of gully erosion in Northeast China and its effects on the national food security[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 9(5):7.
|
[5] |
解运杰, 王岩松, 王玉玺.东北黑土区地域界定及其水土保持区划探析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2005, 25(1):48. XIE Yunjie, WANG Yansong, WANG Yuxi. Defining of chernozem area and zoning of soil and water conservation in Northeastern China[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 25(1):48.
|
[6] |
中华人民共和国国家统计局. 2012年玉米、豆类分省产量[DB/OL].[2017-11-18]http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=E0103. National Bureau of Statistics of China. Corn and beans provincial yield in 2012[DB/OL].[2017-11-18] http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=E0103.
|
[7] |
蔡壮, 沈波. 东北黑土区水土流失防治在保障国家粮食生产中的地位与作用[J]. 中国水利,2007, (20):37. CAI Zhuang, SHEN Bo. Role and function of erosion control in national food security in black soil areas in Northeast China[J].China Water Resources, 2007, (20):37.
|
[8] |
刘宝元,阎百兴,沈波,等.东北黑土区农地水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2008, 6(1):1. LIU Baoyuan, YAN Baixing, SHEN Bo, et al. Current status and comprehensive control strategies of soil erosion for cultivated land in the northeastern black soil area of China[J]. Science of soil and water conservation, 2008, 6(1):1.
|
[9] |
刘宝元, 郭索彦, 李智广, 等. 中国水力侵蚀抽样调查[J]. 中国水土保持, 2013(10):26. LIU Baoyuan, GUO Suoyan, LI Zhiguang, et al. A Sampling survey of the hydraulic erosion in China[J]. Soil and water conservation in China, 2013(10):26.
|
[1] |
ZHANG Hongda, WANG Baoyi, NIU Yong, SONG Yuanyuan, LIU Xia, LI Jiazuo, ZHANG Chunqiang, YUAN Li, LÜ Mingdao. Application of Ovitalmap in field survey of regional water and soil loss monitoring[J]. SSWC, 2018, 16(5): 85-94. |
|
|
|
|