Response of soil respiration to fire interference in two forest types in Jinyun Mountain, Chongqing
WANG Songnian1,2, HOU Ruiping3, FENG Yincheng1,2, MAO Wei1,2, LIU Shuangnan4, MENG Xiangjiang5, XUE Peipei5, WANG Yunqi1,2
1. Three-gorges Reservoir Area(Chongqing) Forest Ecosystem Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China; 2. Three-Gorges Reservoir Area(Chongqing) Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Ministry of Education, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China; 3. Academy of Forestry Inventory and Planning(AFIP), National Forestry and Grassland Administration, 100714, Beijing, China; 4. Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Weichang Manchu and Mongolian Autonomous County, 067000, Chengde, Hebei, China; 5. Chongqing Academy of Forestry Sciences, Chongqing Wuling Mountain Forest Ecosystem National Research Station, 400030, Chongqing, China
Abstract：[Background] The effects of fire interfernce on the soil respiration rates of two kinds of woodland in Jinyun Mountain were discussed, and the short-term changes of soil respiration rate and its influencing factors under different fire disturbance levels of different forest stands were clarified, so as to provide a scientific basis for vegetation restoration and soil treatment after fire disturbance in this area. [Methods] The UAV survey combined with field inspection was used to divide and deploy fire interference Ⅰ (lightl), Ⅱ (moderate), Ⅲ (severe) and control sample plots according to the blackening height and vegetation damage. The closed dynamic air chamber method was used to measure the soil respiration rate in different areas, and the soil environment and physical and chemical properties were measured at the same time. [Results] 1) The change trend of soil temperature in the two forest lands under different levels of fire interference was the same, and the order was: Ⅲ sample plot > Ⅱ sample plot > Ⅰ sample plot > control sample plot. The change trend of soil moisture was opposite to that of soil temperature. 2) The soil respiration rate of mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest land under Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ fire interference was 1.81, 1.5 and 1.38 μmol/(m2·s), respectively, which was 24.9%, 37.8% and 43.8% lower than that of the control. The soil respiration rate of the pure Phyllostachys pubescens forest under grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ fire disturbance was 2.78, 2.34 and 1.65 μmol/(m2·s), respectively, which decreased by 29.1%, 51.4% and 57.9% compared with the control. 3) Fine root biomass of mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest and pure P. pubescens forest decreased with the increase of fire grade. Soil pH and C/N ratio increased with the increase of fire interference level. [Conclusions] Fire interference increases soil temperature and decreases soil moisture. The soil respiration rate is significantly inhibited with the increase of fire interference level, and there was a significant difference in soil respiration rate under different fire interference levels in the same stand. Under the same fire interference level, the soil respiration rate of mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forests was significantly lower than that of pure P.pubescens forests. There was a significant positive correlation between soil respiration rate and fine root biomass, and a significant negative correlation between soil respiration rate and soil pH, which were the main factors influencing the difference of soil respiration rate under fire interference, development of mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forests may effectively reduce the impact of fire interference.
王松年, 侯瑞萍, 冯印成, 毛维, 刘双楠, 孟祥江, 薛沛沛, 王云琦. 重庆缙云山2种林分土壤呼吸对火干扰的响应[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2023, 21(3): 69-77.
WANG Songnian, HOU Ruiping, FENG Yincheng, MAO Wei, LIU Shuangnan, MENG Xiangjiang, XUE Peipei, WANG Yunqi. Response of soil respiration to fire interference in two forest types in Jinyun Mountain, Chongqing. SSWC, 2023, 21(3): 69-77.
HASHIMOTO S, CARVALHAIS N, ITO A, et al. Global spatiotemporaldistribution of soil respiration modeled using a global database [J]. Biogeosciences, 2015, 12(13): 4121.
[2]
谢克勇, 黄志辉, 周勇平, 等. 森林火灾与气象因子的相关性分析[J]. 江西林业科技, 2008(5):53. XIE Keyong, HUANG Zhihui, ZHOU Yongping, et al. Correlation analysis of forest fires and meteorological factors [J]. Jiangxi Forestry Science and Technology, 2008(5): 53.
[3]
QIU Yang, LI Zhandong, ZHANG Yujun, et al. The effects of fire disturbance on the biodiversity of understory plant in virginal forest,northern region of Daxing'anling Mountains,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(9): 2863.
[4]
胡海清, 张富山, 魏书精, 等. 火干扰对土壤呼吸的影响及测定方法研究进展[J]. 森林工程,2013, 29(1):1. HU Haiqing, ZHANG Fushan, WEI Shujing, et al. Research progress on effects of forest fire disturbance on soil respiration and measuring methods [J]. Forest Engineering, 2013, 29(1): 1.
[5]
朱益平, 石静, 王冲冲, 等. 火烧强度对苏南地区植被土壤呼吸的影响研究[J]. 森林防火, 2020(1):27. ZHU Yiping, SHI Jing, WANG Chongchong, et al. Effects of fire intensity on vegetation soil respiration in southern Jiangsu [J]. Forest Fire Prevention, 2020(1): 27.
[6]
李攀, 周梅, 赵鹏武, 等. 大兴安岭火烧迹地土壤呼吸及其与水热因子的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(12):3305. LI Pan, ZHOU Mei, ZHAO Pengwu, et al. Soil respiration and its relationships with hydrothermic factors in the burned areas of Daxingan Mountain [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(12): 3305.
[7]
AMIRO B A, MACPHERSON J I, DESJARDINS R L, et al. Post-fire carbon dioxide fluxes in the western Canadian boreal forest: Evidence from towers, aircraft and remote sensing[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2003, 115: 91.
[8]
CATRY F X, REGO F, MOREIRA F, et al. Post-fire tree mortality in mixed forests of central Portugal[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 260(7): 1184.
[9]
李一凡, 王玉杰, 王彬, 等. 三峡库区典型林分土壤呼吸及其组分对模拟酸雨的响应[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(3): 1457. LI Yifan, WANG Yujie, WANG Bin, et al. Response of soil respiration and its components to simulated acid rain in a typical forest stand in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area [J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(3): 1457.
[10]
刘发林, 曾思齐, 肖化顺, 等. 火干扰对马尾松人工林土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2008, 28(1):35. LIU Falin, ZENG Siqi, XIAO Huashun, et al. Effects of fire disturbance on the soil physical properties of Pinus massoniana plantation [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2008, 28(1): 35.
[11]
SUN Long, HU Tongxin, JI Hongkim, et al. The effect of fire disturbance on short-term soil respiration in typical forest of Greater Xing'an Range, China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2014, 25(3): 613.
[12]
MASYAGINA O V. Carbon dioxide emissions and vegetation recovery in fire-affected forest ecosystems of Siberia: Recent local estimations[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 2021, 23: 100283.
[13]
PLAZA-ÁLVAREZ P A, LUCAS-BORJA M E, SAGRA J, et al. Soil respiration changes after prescribed fires in Spanish black pine (Pinus nigra Arn ssp salzmannii) monospecific and mixed forest stands[J]. Forests, 2017, 8(7): 248.
[14]
冯华敏, 王玉杰, 王云琦, 等. 重庆市缙云山3种森林类型的土壤呼吸特征研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011, 31(5):38. FENG Huamin, WANG Yujie, WANG Yunqi, et al. Soil respiration characteristics of three forests in Jinyun Mount of Chongqing City [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 31(5): 38.
[15]
BOONE R D, NADELHOFFER K J, CANARY J D, et al. Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivityof soil respiration[J]. Nature, 1998, 396(6711): 570.
[16]
杨璐, 汪金松, 赵博, 等. 长期施氮对暖温带油松林土壤呼吸及其组分的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(1):1. YANG Lu, WANG Jinsong, ZHAO Bo, et al. Effects of long-term nitrogen application on soil respiration and its components in warm-temperate forest of Pinus tabulaeformis [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(1): 1.
[17]
周小刚, 张彦军, 南雅芳, 等. 黄土区农田和草地生态系统土壤呼吸差异及其影响因素[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(3):1026. ZHOU Xiaogang, ZHANG Yanjun, NAN Yafang, et al. Differences in soil respiration between cropland and grassland ecosystems and factors influencing soil respiration on the Loess Plateau [J]. Environmental Science, 2013, 34(3): 1026.
[18]
HU Shuaidong, LI Yongfu, CHANG Scootx, et al. Soil autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration respond differently to land-use change and variations in environmental factors[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 250: 290.
[19]
SHINOHARA Y, OTSUKI K. Comparisons of soil-water content between a Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) forest and an evergreen broadleaved forest in western Japan[J]. Plant Species Biology, 2015, 30(2): 96.
[20]
HANSON P J, EDWARDS N T, GARTEN C T, et al. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2000, 48(1): 115.
[21]
URIBE C, INCLÁN R, SÁNCHEZ D M, et al. Effect of wildfires on soil respiration in three typical Mediterranean forest ecosystems in Madrid, Spain[J]. Plant and soil, 2013, 369(1): 403.
[22]
MARDEN M, LAMBIE S, PHILLIPS C. Biomass and root attributes of eight of New Zealand's most common indigenous evergreen conifer and broadleaved forest species during the first 5 years of establishment[J]. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 2018, 48(1): 1.
[23]
KNELMAN J E, GRAHAM E B, FERRENBERG S, et al. Rapid shifts in soil nutrients and decomposition enzyme activity in early succession following forest fire[J]. Forests, 2017, 8(9): 347.
[24]
ZHANG Y, BISWAS A. The effects of forest fire on soil organic matter and nutrients in boreal forests of North America[M]//RAKSHIT A, ABHILASH P, SINGH H B. Adaptive Soil Management: From Theory to Practices. Singapore: Springer, 2017:465.
2023, Vol. 21 
