Study on soil and water conservation safety of small watershed in Beijing
QI Shi, LIU Hui, BI Chao, LI Yue, CHEN Fangxiao, LI Shirong, LU Daming
1. Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Engineering Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation, Engineering Research Center of Forestry Ecological Engineering, Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China;
2. Beijing Linfengyuan Ecological Environment Planning and Designing Institute Co. Ltd., 100083, Beijing, China;
3. Beijing General Working Station of Soil and Water Conservation, 100036, Beijing, China
Abstract：[Background] With the increasing of human activities in recent years, water security, non-point source pollution, the increase of soil erosion area has begun restricting the production activities of Beijing and people's daily life. Soil and water loss has seriously affected the capital's economic and social development and the improvement of people's production and living standards. Therefore, soil and water conservation has played an important role in the prevention and control of soil erosion, and improved the ecological environment of Beijing area. Soil and water conservation is the cornerstone of ensuring the development of the city of Beijing to the international metropolis, taking small watershed as the basic unit, it is necessary to realize the function orientation of different small watershed in the process of specific management, so it is very important to carry out the targeted management.[Methods] Total 1 085 small watersheds were taken as the research objects, taking "Three Safeties" (water source safety, flood control safety, and ecological safety) as the goal oriented, using the GIS technology and the method of principal component analysis and cluster analysis, the evaluation indexes of "water source safety", "flood control safety" and "ecological safety" were constructed respectively, the zones of soil and water conservation for "Three Safeties" in Beijing were divided, and the functional orientation of small watershed in different regions was put forward.[Results] The main problem of water source safety in Beijing small watershed was the pollution to water source, the area was 16%, and the water source in danger was 1.9%. The main problem in flood control safety zone was that mountain torrents occur easily, accounting for 25%. The main problem in ecological security zone was ecological hazard, accounting for 17.2%. From the comprehensive scoring of the "Three Safeties", the main problem in the plain area was water pollution and ecological risk, the double risks such as mountain water pollution-soil loss risk (2.2%), water pollution-mountain torrents prone (1%), water source danger-mountain torrents prone (0.9%) were the key area that needs to be focused on and governed.[Conclusions] Based on the current characteristics of Beijing city, we took the small watershed as the basic unit, with the guidance of "water source safety", "flood control safety" and "ecological safety", respectively, analyzed and evaluated the composition and decisive factors of each requirement, and finally selected and determined the index system according to the importance of various indicators. Taking landform type as the first-level regionalization index and "Three Safeties" as the second-level regionalization index, 2 first-level zones were obtained (plain zone and mountain zone), and 18 second-level zones were obtained.
齐实1, 刘卉1, 毕超2, 李月1, 陈芳孝3, 李世荣3, 陆大明3. 北京市小流域水土保持安全研究[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2018, 16(6): 79-88.
QI Shi, LIU Hui, BI Chao, LI Yue, CHEN Fangxiao, LI Shirong, LU Daming. Study on soil and water conservation safety of small watershed in Beijing. SSWC, 2018, 16(6): 79-88.
孙海清, 许学工. 北京绿色空间格局演变研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(5):48. SUN Haiqing, XU Xuegong. Study on green space pattern changes in Beijing[J]. Progress in Geography, 2007, 26(5):48.
[2]
郑宇, 冯德显. 城市化进程中水土资源可持续利用分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(3):223. ZHENG Yu, FENG Dexian. An analysis of urbanization process and water-land resourc sustainable utilization[J]. Progress in Geography, 2002, 21(3):223.
[3]
万永坤, 董锁成, 王隽妮, 等. 北京市水土资源对经济增长的阻尼效应研究[J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(3):475. WAN Yongkun, DONG Suocheng, WANG Juanni, et al. Damping effect of water and land resources on economic growth in Beijing[J]. Resources Science, 2012, 34(3):475.
时宇. 北京山区小流域水土保持生态安全评价研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2015:6. SHI Yu. Study on ecological security evaluation of small watersheds based on soil and water conservation in mountainous area of Beijing[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2015:6.
[6]
赵小风, 黄贤金, 张兴榆,等. 区域COD、SO2及TSP排放的空间自相关分析:以江苏省为例[J]. 环境科学, 2009, 30(6):1580. ZHAO Xiaofeng, HUANG Xianjin, ZHANG Xingyu, et al. Application of spatial autocorrelation analysis to the COD, SO2, and TSP emission in Jiangsu province[J]. Environment Science, 2009, 30(6):1580.
[7]
岳斯玮. 主成分分析在生态城市建设能力评价中的应用研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2011:19. YUE Siwei. The applied research on the principal components analysis in the capacity-building evaluation of ecological city[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2011:19.
[8]
赵岩. 水土保持区划及功能定位研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2013:75. ZHAO Yan. Study on Soil and Water Conservation Regionalization and Function Orientation[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2013:75.
[9]
关丽, 陈品祥, 闫宁,等. 北京市山区小流域防洪安全风险评估模型研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2016, 44(8):48. GUAN Li, CHEN Pinxiang, YAN Ning, et al. Risk assessment model for flood control of small watershed in Beijing mountain area[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2016, 44(8):48.
[10]
周晓阳, 张勇传. 洪水的分类预测及优化调度[J]. 水科学进展, 1997, 8(2):123. ZHOU Xiaoyang, ZHANG Yongchuan. Flood classifying prediction and optimal flood dispatching[J]. Advances in Water Science, 1997, 8(2):123.
[11]
朱国平. 密云水库北京集水区允许土壤流失空间阈值研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2006:1. ZHU Guoping. Studies on spatial threshold of soil loss tolerance in Beijing Catchment of Miyun Reservoir[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2006:1.
[12]
蒋大林, 曹晓峰, 匡鸿海,等. 生态保护红线及其划定关键问题浅析[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9):1755. JIANG Dalin, CAO Xiaofeng, KUANG Honghai, et al. Ecological red line planning and related key issues analysis for China[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9):1755.
2018, Vol. 16 
