On evaluation model of goal responsibility of soil and water conservation based on objectives and problems
HU Yanting1, ZHANG Fu1, JIN Feng2, WANG Shoujun3, CAO Zhe3, CHEN Tianlin3, MOU Ji3
1. College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, 730070, Lanzhou, China; 2. Department of Water Conservancy of Gansu, 730000, Lanzhou, China; 3. Soil and Water Bureau of the Department of Water Conservancy of Gansu, 730000, Lanzhou, China
Abstract：[Background] Currently, there are differences in the types, intensities and hazards of soil erosion, the diversities and complexities of prevention and control tasks of soil erosion, and the imbalance of social and economic development in different administrative regions. It is difficult to measure the implementation of soil and water conservation work of local governments with a single soil and water conservation target responsibility indicator. Gansu province is one of the provinces with the most serious soil erosion. Therefore, establishing a soil and water conservation target responsibility assessment index system and assessment model composed of certain hierarchical indicators would help to accurately evaluate the level, science and integrity of soil and water conservation in Gansu province in terms of ecological environment construction.[Methods] The analytic hierarchy process(AHP) was used to construct the judgment matrix, calculate the index evaluation weight (W), and the test index rationality (indicator consistency ratio CR<0.1). After the index test was passed, the entropy method was used to modify the weight of the index evaluation obtained by the AHP, and determine the revised comprehensive evaluation weight (P), as well as to establish the assessment index system and evaluation model of Gansu province.[Results] Gansu province's soil and water conservation target responsibility assessment index system is constructed from the aspects of prevention and protection of soil erosion, comprehensive management, comprehensive supervision and accountability, the hierarchical structure consists of a target level (A), a criterion level (Bi), an operation level (Cj), and a sub-operation level (Dk). When establishing a water and soil conservation target responsibility assessment index evaluation model, the responsibility investigation is a negative impact indicator (2), and it is no need to give weights. The first-level indices are composed of three task indices, which are prevention and protection, comprehensive management and comprehensive supervision, whose comprehensive index evaluation weight is 0.400 0, 0.200 0, and 0.400 0, respectively. The rate of soil and water conservation schemes for production and construction projects is the largest (0.198 7) in the prevention and protection indicators of soil erosion, newly area of controlling water loss and soil erosion was the largest (0.120 0) in the comprehensive management indicators of soil erosion, supervision and law enforcement for development and construction projects is the largest (0.148 6) in the comprehensive supervision indicators of soil erosion. It focuses on the important indicators and direct indicators of the government's responsibility for soil erosion prevention and control.[Conculsions] The model consists of 3 first-level indices, 9 second-level indices and 17 third-level indices in Gansu province. There are 4 indicators of >10%:the rate of soil and water conservation schemes for production and construction projects (C3), protected area of key prevention region of soil erosion and water loss (C1), supervision and law enforcement for development and construction projects (D9) and newly area of controlling water loss and soil erosion (C4), accounting for 61.80% of the total weight. It fully reflects the requirements of prevention first, protection priority, emphasis and scientific management, which may provide a reference for the assessment of the target responsibility of soil and water conservation in Gansu province and similar areas, and offer the basic data for the implementation examination of national soil and water conservation planning.
胡彦婷, 张富, 靳峰, 王守俊, 曹喆, 陈天林, 牟极. 以目标问题为导向的水土保持目标责任评价模型[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(2): 111-119.
HU Yanting, ZHANG Fu, JIN Feng, WANG Shoujun, CAO Zhe, CHEN Tianlin, MOU Ji. On evaluation model of goal responsibility of soil and water conservation based on objectives and problems. SSWC, 2020, 18(2): 111-119.
全国人大常委会. 中华人民共和国水土保持法[S]. 北京:中国法制出版社,2011:2. Standing Committee of the National People's Congress.L aw of the People's Republic of China on soil and water conservation[S]. Beijing:China Legal Publishing House, 2011:2.
[2]
中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会关于印发《绿色发展指标体系》《生态文明建设考核目标体系》的通知[EB/OL]. (2016-12-12)[2016-12-28].http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt. Notice of the National Development and Reform Commission of the People's Republic of China on Printing and Distributing the Green Development Indicator System and the Ecological Civilization Construction Assessment Target System[EB/OL]. (2016-12-12)[2016-12-28].http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt.
[3]
水利部关于加快推进水土保持目标责任考核的指导意见[R]. 中华人民共和国水利部公报, 2017(1). The Ministry of Water Resources' guidance on accelerating the assessment of the responsibility for soil and water conservation[R].Ministry of Water Resources Bulletin People's Republic of China,2017(1).
[4]
KARR J R. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities[J]. Fisheries, 1981, 6(6):21.
[5]
DALE V H, BEYELER S C. Challenges inthe development and use of ecological indicators[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2002, 1(1):3.
[6]
金海, 李发鹏, 王建平, 等.水土流失责任追究指标设定的思考和建议[J].中国水土保持,2016(12):1. JIN Hai, LI Fapeng, WANG Jianping, et al. Consideration and suggestion on the setting of indicators for the accountability indicators of soil erosion[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2016(12):1.
[7]
李智广. 试论水土保持目标责任的内容及其考核方法[J]. 中国水土保持, 2016(4):13. LI Zhiguang. Discussion on content and assessment method of soil and water conservation target responsibility[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2016(4):13.
[8]
沈雪建, 李智广. 水土保持目标责任及其评价方法研究[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2017:40. SHEN Xuejian, LI Zhiguang. Study on soil and water conservation target responsibility and its evaluation method[M]. Beijing:China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press, 2017:40.
[9]
姜德文. 水土保持目标责任考核初探[J]. 中国水土保持, 2017(3):6. JIANG Dewen. Preliminary study on soil and water conservation target responsibility assessment[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2017(3):6.
[10]
李发鹏, 王建平, 孙嘉.水土保持领域生态环境损害责任追究制度Ⅲ:情形初探[J].中国水土保持, 2017(11):19. LI Fapeng, WANG Jianping, SUN Jia. The system of accountability for ecological and environmental damage in the field of soil and water conservation III:A preliminary study[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2017(11):19.
[11]
任宗哲, 李尧远. 地方政府目标责任考核中存在的问题与政策建议:以陕西省的目标责任考核为例[J]. 理论导刊, 2010(6):65. REN Zongzhe, LI Yaoyuan. Problems and policy suggestions in the evaluation of local government's target responsibility:Taking Shaanxi provincial target responsibility assessment as an example[J]. Journal of Socialist Theory Guide, 2010(6):65.
[12]
曹小平, 马金珠, 魏国孝. 甘肃省水土流失综合防治对策[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2004, 18(8):87. CAO Xiaoping, MA Jinzhu, WEI Guoxiao. The soil erosion and its countermeasures in Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2004, 18(8):87.
[13]
中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅就甘肃祁连山国家级自然保护区生态环境问题发出通报[EB/OL]. (2017-7-20)[2017-7-25].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-07/20/content_5212107.htm. The General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council issued a circular on the ecological environment of the Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve in Gansu Province[EB/OL]. (2017-7-20)[2017-7-25].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-07/20/content_5212107.htm.
[14]
甘肃省通报中央环境保护督察移交生态环境损害责任追究问题问责情况[EB/OL].(2018-3-29)[2018-3-30]. http://gansu.gscn.com.cn/system/2018/03/29/011940337.shtml. Accountability for the investigation of the responsibility of the central environmental protection inspector for the transfer of ecological environmental damage in Gansu province[EB/OL]. (2018-3-29)[2018-3-30]. http://gansu.gscn.com.cn/system/2018/03/29/011940337.shtml.
[15]
甘肃电投祁连山保护区水电站违规复建再遭生态环境部点名[EB/OL]. (2018-8-29)[2018-9-7].http://www.nbd.com.cn/articles/2018-08-29/1250213.html. The illegal reconstruction of the Qilianshan Nature Reserve Hydropower Station of Gansu Electric Power Investment Group Co., Ltd. was once again named by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment[EB/OL]. (2018-08-29)[2018-09-07].http://www.nbd.com.cn/articles/2018-08-29/1250213.html.
[16]
吝涛,薛雄志,卢昌义."网状"生态指标体系构建及其指标权重分配方法[J].生态学报,2007, 27(1):235. LIN Tao, XUE Xiongzhi, LU Changyi. Methods for developing a net shape ecological indicator system and assigning rational weights to the indicators[J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2007, 27(1):235.
[17]
SAATY T L. The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York:McGraw Hill, 1980.
[18]
李占利. 运筹学简明教程[M]. 西安:西北工业大学出版社, 2004:266. LI Zhanli. Concise Course on Operational Research[M]. Xi'an:Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, 2004:266.
[19]
靳芳,鲁绍伟,余新晓, 等.中国森林生态系统服务价值评估指标体系初探[J].中国水土保持科学,2005, 3(2):5. JIN Fang, LU Shaowei, YU Xinxiao, et al. Preliminary study on evaluation index system of forest ecosystem services in China[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 3(2):5.
[20]
汪永英, 段文标. 小兴安岭南坡3种林型林地水源涵养功能评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2011, 9(5):31. WANG Yongying, DUAN Wenbiao. Evaluation on water conservation capacity of three main forest types in southern slope of Xiao xing'anling Mountains[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 9(5):31.
[21]
王广成, 王欢欢, 谭玲玲. 矿区生态产业评价指标体系[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(14):4515. WANG Guangcheng, WANG Huanhuan, TAN Lingling. Assessment indicator system of eco-industry in mining area[J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2013, 33(14):4515.
[22]
吴丽丽, 张仁陟, 陈韬, 等. 黑河流域农业节水协调可持续发展研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014, 34(3):938. WU Lili, ZHANG Renzhi, CHEN Tao, et al. Water saving, coordinated and sustainable development of agriculture in the Heihe River Basin[J].Journal of Desert Research, 2014, 34(3):938.
[23]
YANG Yin, REN Qingwen, TIAN Ying, et al. Risk analysis for a cascade reservoir system using the brittle risk entropy method[J].Science China(Technological Sciences),2016,59(6):882.
[24]
闫志刚, 李俊清. 基于熵值法与变异系数的大熊猫分布区生态系统评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(12):4007. YAN Zhigang, LI Junqing. Assessment of ecosystem in giant panda distribution area based on entropy method and coefficient of variation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applies Ecology, 2017, 28(12):4007.
2020, Vol. 18 
