Please wait a minute...
档案学研究  2025, Vol. 39 Issue (2): 64-74    DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2025.02.008
  档案法规标准 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
基于扎根理论的国外档案出境立法考察及启示
王兴广
中国人民大学信息资源管理学院 北京 100872
Research on the Overseas Legislation Investigation and Enlightenment of Archives Cross-border Transfer Based on Grounded Theory
Xingguang WANG
School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
全文: HTML    PDF(1444 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

国外档案出境相关立法对于我国完善档案出境法律规制具有重要借鉴意义，有助于我国健全档案法律法规体系，促进档案出境合法治理实现内外衔接。采用程序化扎根理论的三级编码分析方法，对收集到的32部国外档案出境相关法律法规进行文本分析，归纳国外档案出境立法的主范畴，并提取其核心要素的内在关系。基于国外档案出境立法内容分析，总结其对我国的启示：确立重要档案不可渡让的行为准则、厘清档案出境许可对象的范围边界、消解档案出境监管主体的权责背离、细化档案出境违法惩戒的条文规定。
Abstract：

Overseas legislation related to the cross-border transfer of archives has important reference significance for China to improve the legal regulations for the cross-border transfer of archives. It will help China improve the legal system of archival laws and regulations and promote the internal and external integration of the legal governance of archives cross-border transfer. Using the three-level coding analysis method of the proceduralised grounded theory, this research conducted text analysis on the collected 32 laws and regulations related to the cross-border transfer of archives, summarized the main categories of overseas legislation of archives cross-border transfer, and extracted the internal relationship of its core elements. Based on the content analysis of overseas legislation related to the cross-border transfer of archives, the research summarized its implications for China's archives legislation:establishing the code of conduct of non-transferability of important archives, defining the scope and boundaries of the objects of archives cross-border transfer permits, resolving the discrepancy between the rights and responsibilities of the supervisory bodies for archives cross-border transfer, and refining the provisions of the penalties for violating the law on archives cross-border transfer.
出版日期: 2025-04-28
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
引用本文:

王兴广. 基于扎根理论的国外档案出境立法考察及启示[J]. 档案学研究, 2025, 39(2): 64-74.
Xingguang WANG. Research on the Overseas Legislation Investigation and Enlightenment of Archives Cross-border Transfer Based on Grounded Theory. Archives Science Study, 2025, 39(2): 64-74.

链接本文:

https://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2025.02.008      或      https://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2025/V39/I2/64

[1] [71] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国档案法[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail2.html?ZmY4MDgwODE3MmI1ZjI0ZjAxNzJlNGVmMDVlMjE4ZDQ%3D.
[2] 国务院. 中华人民共和国档案法实施条例[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail2.html?ZmY4MDgxODE4ZDczNmUwODAxOGRjZjg1MTE4OTA0YjI%3D.
[3] 朱景文. 比较法总论:第三版[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2014:41-45.
[4] 王兴广. 我国档案出境安全监管的现状、困境与策略[J]. 档案学研究, 2024(4):57-67.
[5] 马秋影. 修改档案及复制件出境行政许可相关档案法律法规的思考[J]. 中国档案, 2017(12):68-69.
[6] 胡文苑. 档案出境许可审查的基本范式—以注销外资企业的会计档案出境为例[J]. 浙江档案, 2019(2):14-16.
[7] 耿志杰, 刘志森. 档案数据互联网传输出境的实施困境与完善策略[J]. 浙江档案, 2021(3):24-26.
[8] [55] 徐拥军, 王兴广. 总体国家安全观下的跨境数据流动安全治理研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023(6):20-30.
[9] 连志英. 数字档案资源整合影响因素分析:基于建构型扎根理论的研究[J]. 档案学通讯, 2015(6):52-56.
[10] ZHAO Y, WU X, LI S. Perceived values to personal digital archives and their relationship to archiving behaviours: an exploratory research based on grounded theory[J]. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2024(3):677-697.
[11] XIE L S. A must for agencies or a candidate for deletion: a grounded theory investigation of the relationships between records management and information security[J]. Records Management Journal, 2019(1/2):57-85.
[12] TIE C Y, BIRKS M, FRANCIS K. Grounded theory research: a design framework for novice researchers[J]. SAGE Open Medicine, 2019(7):1-8.
[13] 王立峰, 孙文飞. 新时代党内法规建设的价值取向—基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 理论与改革, 2022(3):56-69.
[14] 黄体杨, 孙笠雯. 农村图书馆如何服务于乡村振兴?—对乡村振兴相关法律与政策文本的扎根理论研究[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022(10):84-92.
[15] Федеральное архивное агентство. Положение о Федеральном архивном агентстве[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_199902/c6a01227bf31785f9503e36de95c670284a72ac4/.
[16] [58][64] Федеральное архивное агентство. Федеральный закон от 22. 10. 2004 № 125-ФЗ «Об архивном делев Российской Федерации»[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&link_id=17&nd=102089077.
[17] [62][74] U. S. Government Publishing Office. Part 1230-Unlawful or accidental removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of records[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2021-title36-vol3/xml/CFR-2021-title36-vol3-part1230.xml.
[18] [60] The federal register of legislation. My health records act 2012[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2021C00475.
[19] [67][73] Legislation Division of the Attorney-General's Chambers of Singapore. National Library Board Act 1995[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/NLBA1995.
[20] [51][56] Légifrance. Code du patrimoine[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006074236/LEGISCTA000006129161/#LEGISCTA000006129161.
[21] [29][45][46] NIGEL CORY. Cross-border data flows: where are the barriers, and what do they cost?[R/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://itif.org/publications/2017/05/01/cross-border-data-flows-where-are-barriers-and-what-do-they-cost/.
[22] The U. S. National Archives and Records Administration. Records management by federal agencies (44 U. S. C. Chapter 31)[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/fed-agencies.html.
[23] [30][32] 国家档案局政策法规研究司. 境外国家和地区档案法律法规选编[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2017:37,397-400,421.
[24] [52] Swiss Federal Archives. Federal act on archiving[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/filestore/fedlex.data.admin.ch/eli/cc/1999/354/20130501/en/doc/fedlex-data-admin-ch-eli-cc-1999-354-20130501-en-doc.doc.
[25] UNESCO Cultural Heritage Laws Database. Promulgation of the Danish Archives Act[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://wipolex-res.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/dk/dk154en.html.
[26] L-Uffiċċju tal-Avukat tal-Istat. National Archives Act 2005[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://legislation.mt/eli/cap/477/eng/pdf.
[27] [65] Tanah Kuala Selangor. National Archives Act 2003[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://kualaselangor.selangor.gov.my/kualaselangor/resources/File%20upload/Pengurusan%20Rekor%20Arkib/1_National_Archives_Act_2003.pdf.
[28] [75] Republic of South Africa. National archives and record service of south africa act[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://www.gov.za/documents/national-archives-south-africa-act.
[31] [68] The National Archives. National Archives Act 1986[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://www.nationalarchives.ie/PDF/NAA1986.pdf.
[33] [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][53][59][63][66][69][70][77][78] 中国档案学会对外联络部,《档案学通讯》编辑部. 外国档案法规选编[M]. 北京: 档案出版社, 1983:60,141-143,164,69,43-56,28-29,112-115,171,123,181-182,43-56,28-29,171,164,181-182,28-29,60,112-115.
[43] Finlex. Kirjanpitolaki[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1997/19971336#L2P9.
[44] [61] 胡兴国. 瑞典《会计法》简介[J]. 金融会计, 1994(6):38-39.
[47] [48] CORBIN J M, STRAUSS A. Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria[J]. Qualitative Sociology, 1990(1):3-21.
[49] PANDIT N R. The creation of theory: a recent application of the grounded theory method[J]. The Qualitative Report, 1996(4):1-15.
[50] 王玉珏. 遗产保护体系下的档案立法:法国《遗产法典(第二卷:档案馆)》解读[J]. 档案学通讯, 2016(4):17-22.
[54] CALABRESI G, MELAMED A D. Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: one view of the cathedral[M]//Modern Understandings of Liberty and Property. London: Routledge, 2013: 139-178.
[57] 杨立人. 档案所有权的保护与限制[J]. 档案学通讯, 2007(3):17-20.
[72] 对外贸易经济合作部, 国家经济贸易委员会, 国家档案局. 外商投资企业档案管理暂行规定[EB/OL].[2024-10-26]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/1994-12/29/content_5712491.htm.
[76] 王兴广. 档案出境全过程风险管控:逻辑理据与实践策略[J]. 北京档案, 2024(9):22-27.
No related articles found!
版权所有 ©《档案学研究》编辑部 | 联系我们
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持：support@magtech.com.cn