助推理论视域下档案资源叙事性开发框架构建

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2025.02.012

档案学研究

2025, Vol. 39

Issue (2): 102-110 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2025.02.012

档案资源开发

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

助推理论视域下档案资源叙事性开发框架构建

彭思源¹,王平^1,²,李沐妍^1,²,夏尤清³

1 武汉大学信息管理学院武汉 430072
2 档案智能开发与服务国家档案局重点实验室武汉 430072
3 澳大利亚昆士兰大学商学院布里斯班 4072

Constructing a Framework for the Narrative Development of Archives Resources from the Perspective of Nudge Theory

Siyuan PENG¹,Ping WANG^1,²,Muyan LI^1,²,Youqing XIA³

1 School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072
2 Key Laboratory of Archival Intelligent Development and Service, NAAC, Wuhan 430072
3 Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072

全文:

HTML

PDF(1548 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要:

档案资源叙事性开发在“讲好中国故事，传播好中国声音”方面发挥着重要作用。为提升档案叙事用户的叙事体验，本文从用户认知视角出发，在助推理论的指导下，解构用户认知与档案资源叙事性开发之间的映射关系，构建全方位的档案资源叙事性开发框架。同时，将焦裕禄兰考治理“三害”叙事开发作为应用案例，验证了所提框架具有聚焦深层认知、增强可操作性、合乎伦理道德的优势。本文帮助档案叙事开发者确定用户认知规律与档案资源叙事性开发之间的建构路径，为其提供明确的设计依据，丰富了认知心理学在档案叙事领域的研究，对档案资源叙事性开发具有重要的参考价值。

关键词 ：档案资源叙事性开发, 档案叙事服务, 用户认知, 助推理论

Abstract：

The narrative development of archives resources plays a crucial role in "telling China's story well and spreading China's voice effectively". Guided by the nudge theory and from the perspective of user cognition, this paper deconstructs the mapping relationship between user cognition and the narrative development of archives resources. It constructs a comprehensive framework for the narrative development of archives resources to improve the narrative experience of users. Additionally, the narrative development of Jiao Yulu's governance of the "three harms" in Lankao is used as a case study to validate the framework's advantages in focusing on deep cognition, enhancing operability, and maintaining ethical integrity. This paper aids archival narrative developers in establishing the construction path between user cognitive patterns and the narrative development of archives resources, providing clear design guidelines, it enriches the research of cognitive psychology in the field of archival narratives and offers significant reference value for the narrative development of archival resources.

Key words： narrative development of archives resources archival narrative services user cognition nudge theory

出版日期: 2025-04-28

通讯作者: 王平

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	彭思源
	王平
	李沐妍
	夏尤清

引用本文:

彭思源, 王平, 李沐妍, 夏尤清. 助推理论视域下档案资源叙事性开发框架构建[J]. 档案学研究, 2025, 39(2): 102-110.
Siyuan PENG, Ping WANG, Muyan LI, Youqing XIA. Constructing a Framework for the Narrative Development of Archives Resources from the Perspective of Nudge Theory. Archives Science Study, 2025, 39(2): 102-110.

链接本文:

https://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2025.02.012 或 https://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2025/V39/I2/102

[1]	刘越男, 贺谭涛, 何思源. 践行“三个走向”的时代意义、现实成就与行动展望[J]. 档案学研究, 2024(2):4-12.
[2]	崔璐, 李姗姗, 王敏敏. 情境认知视域下档案文献叙事化开发模型与路径[J]. 山西档案, 2022(2):13-20,55.
[3]	[43] 戴艳清, 刘喜涛. 基于叙事要素的档案资源叙事性开发研究—以《国家记忆》栏目为例[J]. 档案与建设, 2023(1):37-40.
[4]	赵雪芹, 彭邓盈政. 数智赋能环境下的档案数字叙事模式研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2022(5):67-73.
[5]	朱兰兰, 段燕鸽. 叙事理论在红色档案资源开发中的应用—以大别山区为例[J]. 档案学研究, 2023(2):95-102.
[6]	何玲, 马晓玥, 档案研究僧. 跨媒体叙事理论观照下的档案叙事优化策略—以红色档案为例的分析[J]. 档案学通讯, 2021(5):14-21.
[7]	谢玉雪. 数字档案资源的可视化叙事服务研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2020(3):122-128.
[8]	周耀林, 张丽华, 刘红. 叙事传输视角下红色档案资源社会共建模式与实现路径研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2023(1):82-90.
[9]	[11] 赵雪芹, 彭邓盈政. 基于具身交互叙事的档案数字叙事体验研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2023(5):88-97.
[10]	李雪婷, 闫静. “媒介情景论”视域下红色档案的情感叙事研究[J]. 北京档案, 2024(7):4-9.
[12]	SCHMIDT A T. The power to nudge[J]. American Political Science Review, 2017(2):404-417.
[13]	LIN Y, OSMAN M, ASHCROFT R. Nudge: concept, effectiveness, and ethics[J]. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2017(6):293-306.
[14]	THALER R H, SUNSTEIN C R. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008:6.
[15]	PARK Y S, HAM J Y. A study on Seoul Milk's commercial advertising storytelling though the Nudge effects[J]. Journal of Digital Convergence, 2020(3):299-304.
[16]	ENGELEN B, THOMAS A, ARCHER A, et al. Exemplars and nudges: combining two strategies for moral education[J]. Journal of Moral Education, 2018(3):346-365.
[17]	EVANS J S B T. In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003(10):454-459.
[18]	EVANS J S B T. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition[J]. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 2008(1):255-278.
[19]	EVANS J S B T. On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning[J]. Thinking & Reasoning, 2007(4):321-339.
[20]	EVANS J S B T. The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: extension and evaluation[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2006(3):378-395.
[21]	[31] YEAZITZIS T, WEGER K, CLERKIN J, et al. Heuristics and biases in system architecture[C]// 2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium(SIEDS). New York: IEEE, 2022:168-173.
[22]	[24][32][35] TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases: biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty[J]. Science, 1974(4157):1124-1131.
[23]	[34] YAMASHIRO J K, ROEDIGER III H L. Biased collective memories and historical overclaiming: an availability heuristic account[J]. Memory & Cognition, 2021(2):311-322.
[25]	[36] TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice[J]. Science, 1981(4481):453-458.
[26]	[37] 戚景琳, 韩正彪. 信息行为研究中的行为经济学理论:应用、贡献和展望[J]. 情报资料工作, 2024(3):31-40.
[27]	[39] KUO H C, NAKHATA C. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth on customer satisfaction[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2019(3):331-348.
[28]	[40] WANG P, YANG H, HOU J, et al. A machine learning approach to primacy-peak-recency effect-based satisfaction prediction[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2023(2).
[29]	[41] SLOVIC P, FINUCANE M L, PETERS E, et al. The affect heuristic[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007(3):1333-1352.
[30]	[42] SILVESTER C. Authority bias[M]// RAZ M, POURYAHYA P. Decision making in emergency medicine. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021:41-46.
[33]	曹艳梅. 历史新说与“陌生化”呈现—以电影《满江红》的叙事范式为例[J]. 视听, 2024(3):76-79.
[38]	张渝, 邵兵家. 强制型顾客参与对感知共同创造与在线服务补救满意的影响研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2022(1):1-12.
[44]	牛力, 高晨翔, 张宇锋, 等. 发现、重构与故事化:数字人文视角下档案研究的路径与方法[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2021(1):88-107.
[45]	阮士桂. 以小谋大:助推理论及其对在线教学优化的启示[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2023(6):88-97.
[46]	BUHALIS D, LEUNG D, LIN M. Metaverse as a disruptive technology revolutionising tourism management and marketing[J]. Tourism Management, 2023, 97: 1-11.
[47]	周延风, 张婷. 助推理论及其应用研究述评与未来展望—行为决策改变的新思路[J]. 财经论丛, 2019(10):94-103.
[48]	付春野, 吕小康, 张雅睿. 公共政策中助推策略的伦理争议[J]. 公共行政评论, 2022(3):179-195,200.
[49]	[51] HANSEN P G, JESPERSEN A M. Nudge and the manipulation of choice: a framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy[J]. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2013(1):3-28.
[50]	[52] KONSTANTINOU L, PANOS D, KARAPANOS E. Exploring the design of technology-mediated nudges for online misinformation[J]. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 2025(1):515-542.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed