档案与身份认同研究现状考察与进路展望

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.01.005

档案学研究

2021, Vol. 35

Issue (1): 32-39 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.01.005

基础理论研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

档案与身份认同研究现状考察与进路展望

陆阳, 蔡之玲

上海大学图书情报档案系上海 200444

Investigation and Prospect of Archives and Identity Research

LU Yang, CAI Zhiling

Department of Library,Information and Archives of Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444

输出:BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要: 通过对国内外档案与身份认同研究相关文献的计量分析和焦点梳理发现,档案学者们已经就档案在身份认同中作为历史记忆中介的功能定位、作为身份认同建构性资源价值与推进认同的策略等方面进行了广泛的论证与研究,取得了一定的成果。但综合考察研究现状后也得到了相关研究尚存在概念辨析混乱化、研究视角单一化、研究内容静态化、研究层次局限化以及研究方法纯理论化等局限,进而提出概念定位情境化、功能框架多维化、分析层级系统化、研究内容动态化、研究方法实证化等未来研究进路构想。

Abstract：Through quantitative analysis and combing of domestic and foreign literature on archives and identity research, we found that archives scholars have conducted extensive demonstrations and researches on the functional positioning of archives as mediators of historical memory in identity, its value as a constructive resourceand strategies for promoting identity through archives paths. Such researches have achieved certain results. However, after comprehensively reviewing the current research situation, we have also obtained the limitations of related research, including the confusion of concept analysis, single research perspective, static research content, limited research leveland purely theoretical research methods. And then this paper further proposes future research approaches such as conceptualization of contextualization, multi-dimensional functional framework, systematic analysis level, dynamic research contentand empirical research methods.

出版日期: 2021-02-04

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

陆阳, 蔡之玲. 档案与身份认同研究现状考察与进路展望[J]. 档案学研究, 2021, 35(1): 32-39.
LU Yang, CAI Zhiling. Investigation and Prospect of Archives and Identity Research. Archives Science Study, 2021, 35(1): 32-39.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.01.005 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2021/V35/I1/32

[1] Megill A.Historical knowledge,historical error:a contemporary guide to practice[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2007:43.
[2] Brown C.Memory,identity and the archival paradigm:introduction to the special issue[J].Archival Science,2013(2):85-93.
[3] Schwartz J M,Cook T.Archives,records,and power:the making of modern memory[J]. Archival Science,2002(2):1-19.
[4] 特里·库克,李音. 四个范式:欧洲档案学的观念和战略的变化—1840年以来西方档案观念与战略的变化[J].档案学研究,2011(03):81-87.
[5] Bastian J A.The records of memory,the archives of identity:celebrations,texts and archival sensibilities[J]. Archival Science,2013(3):121-131.
[6] Ketelaar E.Cultivating archives:meanings and identities[J].Archival Science,2012(1):19-33.
[7] [16] Caron D J,Kellerhals A.Archiving for self-ascertainment identity-building and permanent self-questioning:archives between scepticism and certitude[J].Archival Science,2013(6):207-216.
[8] Dritsas L,Haig J.An archive of identity:the Central African Archives and Southern Rhodesian history[J].Archival Science,2014(1):35-54.
[9] Ketelaar E.Accountability portrayed:documents on regents' group portraits in the Dutch Golden Age[J].Archival Science,2014(3):69-93.
[10] Josias A.Toward an understanding of archives as a feature of collective memory[J].Archival Science,2011(1):95-112.
[11] [15] Kaplan E.We are what we collect,we collect what we are:archives and the construction of identity[J].The American Archivist,2000(1):126-151.
[12] Ketelaar E.The genealogical gaze:family identities and family archives in the fourteenth to seventeenth centuries[J].Libraries &the Cultural Record,2009(1):9-28.
[13] Kolanovic J.The institutionalization of archives and the national identity in croatia in second half of 19. century[M].Bruno D,Christine N.Archives et nations,dans l'Europe du XIX-e siecle.Paris:L'Ecole de chartes,2004:59-80.
[14] Gonzalez A.Oral history,collective memory and community theatre:the case of verbatim theatre[J].Signa-revista de la asociacion espanola de semiotica,2016(25):273-296.
[17] Millar L A.Principles and practice in records management and archives[M].London:Facet Publishing,2010:23.
[18] Stepniak W.Identity:Can archives and archivists contribute to fostering and preserving local,regional,and national identities?[J].Comma,2013(1):103-110.
[19] 冯惠玲. 多学科视角下的档案学理论研究进展[A].中国档案学会. 创新:档案与文化强国建设—2014年档案事业发展研究报告集[C].北京:中国文史出版社,2014:6-66.
[20] 徐拥军. 档案、集体记忆与身份认同[N].中国档案报,2017-09-25(003).
[21] 加小双. 当代身份认同中家族档案的价值[J].档案学通讯,2015(03):29-34.
[22] 徐拥军. 档案记忆观:社会学与档案学的双向审视[J].求索,2017(07):159-166.
[23] 冯惠玲. 当代身份认同中的档案价值[J]. 中国人民大学学报,2015(01):96-103.
[24] 丁宁. 双重回忆模式与档案资源建设—基于阿莱达·阿斯曼文化记忆理论的思考[J].档案,2018(08):5-11.
[25] 加小双. 当代身份认同中家族档案的价值[J].档案学通讯,2015(03):29-34.
[26] 陈玉杰. 农民工身份认同中档案的作用[J].浙江档案,2018(03):19-21.
[27] 王萍. 基于文化认同视角的体制外档案资源建设思考[J].档案学通讯,2013(01):24-27.
[28] 郭向. 浅论文学艺术档案的集体认同性[J].兰台世界,2018(S2):95-96.
[29] 张全海. 世系谱牒与族群认同[J].档案学通讯,2010(05):54-55.
[30] 叶方园. 基于文化认同视角对追索流失海外藏文历史档案的辩证性思考[J].档案管理,2018(03):40-42.
[31] 蒋国勇,应小丽.社会认同视野下乡村档案文化建设的实践逻辑—基于浙江省畈田蒋村的调查分析[J].档案学通讯,2014(01):90-94.
[32] 王笛. 论档案文献编纂在身份认同建构中的功能及其实现[J]. 北京档案,2018(07):17-20.
[33] 朱莉. 身份认同对档案信息资源建设的影响及其趋势[J]. 浙江档案,2017(02):17-19.
[34] 张坤媛. 身份认同背景下的综合档案馆工作转变研究[D]. 沈阳:辽宁大学,2016.
[35] 魏芳. 高校特殊学生群体档案服务研究[J].山西档案,2018(06):65-67.
[36] 蒋国勇. 社会认同视野下乡村档案文化建设的长效机制研究[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2013 (06):103-107.
[37] 王景平. 身份认同的瓦解与重建[D]. 广州:华南理工大学,2013.
[38] Marcia J E.Development and validation of ego identity status[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1966(3):551-558.
[39] Stryker S,Burke P.The past,present,and future of an identity theory[J].Social Psychology Quarterly,2000(4):284-297.
[40] Rex J,David M.Theories of race and ethnic relations[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1986:52-57.
[41] 陶家俊. 身份认同导论[J].外国文学,2004(02):37-44.
[42] 彭庆鸿. 乡音、乡情与乡谊:苏州评弹与域外“江南人”的身份认同[J].地方文化研究,2018(05):95-102.
[43] 徐延辉,邱啸.社会经济保障与农民工的身份认同[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2019(02):102-111.
[44] 钱雪梅.从认同的基本特性看族群认同与国家认同的关系[J].民族研究,2006(06):16-25,106-107.
[45] Paul J.Despite the terrors of typologies:the importance of understanding categories of difference and identity[J].Interventions,2015(2):174-195.
[46] 威尔弗莱德艾·史密斯,丁媚.“总体档案”:加拿大的经验[J].档案学通讯,2001(04):71-75.
[47] 乔纳森·特纳,简·斯戴兹.情感社会学[M].孙俊才,文军,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2007:115.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed