Please wait a minute...
档案学研究  2019, Vol. 33 Issue (2): 71-76    DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2019.02.011
  档案资源建设 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
我国社群档案建设的意义、困境与路径
李孟秋
中国人民大学信息资源管理学院 北京 100872
The Significance,Dilemma and Path of Community Archives Construction in China
Mengqiu LI
School of Information Resources Management in Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872
全文: HTML    PDF(943 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

社群档案是具有共同身份特征的特定社群成员所形成的、记录社群历史的文件集合。加强社群档案建设,可以满足人民群众的精神文化需求,推动社会进步,促进社会多元发展,拓展档案工作职能。但是,我国社群档案建设面临着物理困境、文化困境、理念困境和身份困境。国际档案界对于社群档案认知的变化启示我们:在社群档案的建设过程中,社群成员的主动构建至关重要,档案学者的“过程向导”与“前端指引”愈发关键,社群档案价值形态与社会包容度息息相关,应积极倡导合作。因此,在当前国内环境下进一步建设社群档案,应立足于社群档案记忆价值的实现,打造社群档案“联合体”,追求学科融合发展,发掘中国特色的社群档案。

Abstract

Community archives refers to collections of material that record the history of a community formed by members of a specific community with common identity characteristics. Strengthening the construction of community archives can meet the spiritual and cultural needs of the people,promote social progress,facilitate the diversified development of society,and expand the archives work functions. However,the construction of community archives in China faces physical dilemmas,cultural predicaments,ideological dilemmas and identity dilemmas. The changes of international archival community’s understanding of community archives reveal to us that the active construction of community members is crucial in the process of building community archives,the archivists’“process guide”and“front-end guidance”are more and more critical,the value form of community archives is closely related to social inclusion,and cooperation should be actively promoted. Therefore,in the current domestic environment, the further construction of community archives should be based on the realization of the memory value of community archives,create a“union”of community archives,pursue the development of discipline integration and explore the community archives with Chinese characteristics.

出版日期: 2019-07-05
引用本文:

李孟秋. 我国社群档案建设的意义、困境与路径[J]. 档案学研究, 2019, 33(2): 71-76.
Mengqiu LI. The Significance,Dilemma and Path of Community Archives Construction in China. Archives Science Study, 2019, 33(2): 71-76.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2019.02.011      或      http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2019/V33/I2/71

[1] 冯雪,王英玮. 全局性档案管理体系与参与式档案管理模式研究—— 基于英国社群档案管理经验的思考[J].浙江档案,2017(1):28-30.
[2] 谭雪,孙海敏.国外社群档案概念的兴起背景、研究进展与评析[J].浙江档案,2015(11):13-16.
[3] 王晓云. 西方社群档案理论发展的五个阶段及其实践所面临的挑战[J]. 档案学通讯,2017(5):84-88.
[4] Wakimoto D K,Bruce C,Partridge H.Archivist as activist:lessons from three queer community archives in California[J]. Archival Science,2013,13(4):293-316.
[5] Andrew Flinn, Mary Stevens,ElizabethShepherd. Whose memories, whose archives? Inde-pendent community archives, autonomy and themainstream[J]. Archival Science, 2009(9):71-86.
[6] 世界记忆遗产—— 侨批档案[EB/OL].[2018-7-7].http://www.huaxia.com/zt/zhwh/16-014/4874255.html.
[7] 谭雪. 常德日本细菌战档案公开—— 社群范式下档案如何推动社会公正与和解进程[J].档案学研究,2016(3):54-58.
[8] 谭必勇,陈珍. 社群档案视域下公共档案资源体系的多元化建设路径—— 以澳大利亚国家档案馆“强制收养历史项目”为例[J].档案学研究,2017(6):117-124.
[9] 罗伯特·普特南. 使民主运转起来[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015.
[10] Terry Cook.Evidence,memory,identity,and community:four shifting archival paradigms[J].Archival Science, 2013(13):95-120.
[11] Anne Gilliland,Andrew Flinn.Community Archives: what are we really talking about?[C]. CIRN Prato Community Informatics Conference,2013.
[12] ONE Archives at the USC Libraries[EB/OL][2018-7-8]. https://one.usc.edu/about.
[13] 黄霄羽,陈可彦. 论社群档案工作参与模式[J].档案学通讯,2017(5):89-94.
[14] 在全国档案局长馆长会议上的工作报告[EB/OL][2018-7-9].http://www.saac.gov.cn/news/2018-01/22/content_219103.htm.
[15] 王晓云. 西方社群档案理论发展的五个阶段及其实践所面临的挑战[J]. 档案学通讯,2017(5):84-88.
No related articles found!