我国档案信息资源研究的主题挖掘与演化分析

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2019.02.010

档案学研究

2019, Vol. 33

Issue (2): 61-70 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2019.02.010

档案资源建设

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

我国档案信息资源研究的主题挖掘与演化分析

胡吉明, 常大伟, 孙晶琼

武汉大学信息管理学院武汉 430072

Analysis of Archive Information Resource in China based on Topic Mining and Evolution

Jiming HU, Dawei CHANG, Jingqiong SUN

School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072

全文:

HTML

PDF(4086 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要:

近年来,我国档案信息资源研究涉及主题广泛且发展势头较好,但缺乏主题关联结构层面的态势分析。本文基于CNKI数据库,在提取文献主题词的基础上,以共现分析为理论依据,进行我国档案信息资源研究的主题分布、关联结构及演化态势的指标计算与可视化揭示。研究结果表明,我国档案信息资源研究的主题涉及面广且较为集中,但分布不平衡;我国档案信息资源研究领域已形成档案资源建设、档案服务、开发利用、资源共享、城建档案5个主要的研究方向,但各个方向发展成熟度存在明显差异;我国档案信息资源研究领域在研究方向上已趋于稳定,且延续性较强,同时在发展中也存在诸多主题的融合与分化现象。

Abstract：

Research of Archive Information Resource in China involves many topics and maintains the good development momentum. However,it lacks the quantitative analysis,especially the correlation structure of topics, to reveal the intellectual structure,evolution patterns and development trends. Based on the CNKI database,topic words are extracted from literature. With the aid of co-occurrence theory,the distribution of topics,correlation structures,and evolution patterns in Archive Information Resource research are revealed and visualized. Topics in research of Archive Information Resource in China cover broadly and are relatively concentrated; but their distribution is unbalanced. There are 5 main research directions in terms of archives resource construction,archives services, development & utilization,resource sharing and urban construction archives,and there are obvious differences in the maturity of each direction. The evolution of these research directions tends to be stable with powerful continuity,as well as fusion and differentiation of topics.

出版日期: 2019-07-05

基金资助:本文为教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目“大数据资源规划与统筹发展研究”（项目批准号：16JJD870001）研究成果之一。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

胡吉明, 常大伟, 孙晶琼. 我国档案信息资源研究的主题挖掘与演化分析[J]. 档案学研究, 2019, 33(2): 61-70.
Jiming HU, Dawei CHANG, Jingqiong SUN. Analysis of Archive Information Resource in China based on Topic Mining and Evolution. Archives Science Study, 2019, 33(2): 61-70.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2019.02.010 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2019/V33/I2/61

[1]	刘转平,周丽霞. 近5年我国档案信息资源的研究综述—— 基于档案学13种核心期刊的论文分析[J].档案管理,2011(2):61-65.
[2]	Small H.,Griffith B.C. The structure of scientific literatures I:Identifying and graphing specialties[J]. Science Studies,1974,4(1):17-40.
[3]	Catala-Lopez F.,Alonso-Arroyo A., et al.Coauthorship and institutional collaborations on cost-effectiveness analyses: A systematic network analysis[J]. Plos One, 2012,7(5):e38012.
[4]	Boerner, K.Plug-and-play macroscopes. Communications of the ACM,2011,54(3),60-69.
[5]	刘奕杉,王玉琳,李明鑫.词频分析法中高频词阈值界定方法适用性的实证分析[J]. 数字图书馆论坛,2017(9):42-49.
[6]	Doreian P.,Lloyd P.,Mrvar A.Partitioning large signed two-mode networks:Problems and prospects[J]. Social Networks,2013,35(2),178-203.
[7]	Yan E.,Ding Y.,Zhu Q.Mapping library and information science in China:a coauthorship network analysis[J]. Scientometrics,2010,83(1),115-131.
[8]	Freeman L.C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification[J]. Social Networks,1979,1(3):215-239.
[9]	Leydesdorff L.,Park H.W.,Wagner C. International coauthorship relations in the Social Sciences Citation Index:Is internationalization leading the network?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(10):2111-2126.
[10]	Blondel V.D.,Guillaume J.-L. Lambiotte R. Lefebvre, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics:Theory and Experiment,2008,8(10):P10008.
[11]	Stegmann J., Grohmann G.Hypothesis generation guided by co-word clustering[J]. Scientometrics,2003,56(1):111-135.
[12]	Van Eck N.J.,Waltman L. Software survey:VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping[J]. Scientometrics,2010,84(2),523-538.
[13]	Rosvall M.,Bergstrom C.T. Mapping change in large networks[J]. Plos One,2010,5(1):e8694.
[14]	Leydesdorff L.,Goldstone R.L. Interdisciplinarity at the journal and specialty level:The changing knowledge bases of the journal Cognitive Science[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(1):164-177.
[15]	马伏秋. 2000年以来档案信息资源开发与利用研究述评—— 基于《档案学通讯》《档案学研究》的论文分析[J]. 档案学通讯,2015(1):45-51.
[16]	史昊. 现阶段城建档案管理存在的问题及对策[J]. 城建档案,2018(1):59-60.
[17]	周耀林,赵跃,姬荣伟.“三个体系”视角下档案管理研究框架的重构[J].档案学研究,2017(4):4-10.
[18]	杨冬权. 贯彻党的十七大精神以科学发展观为指导全面做好2008年的档案工作—— 在全国档案工作暨表彰先进会议上的讲话[J].中国档案,2008(2):4-13.
[19]	全国档案事业发展“十二五”规划[EB/OL].[2018-04-10](2010-08-16). http://jda.cq.gov.cn/zwgk/gkxx/ggl/20634.htm.
[20]	全国档案事业发展“十三五”规划纲要[EB/OL].[2018-04-10](2016-04-11). http://www.cngsda.net/art/2016/4/11/art_57_33934.html.
[21]	谭必勇,陈艳.社会记忆视野下数字档案资源建设的多元化路径探析[J].档案学通讯,2018(1):62-66.
[22]	陈艳红. 30年来档案信息资源开发利用研究述评——基于《档案学研究》《档案学通讯》的论文分析[J].档案学研究,2010(2):45-48.
[23]	冯厚娟. 1987年~2010年我国档案信息资源共享研究综述[J].档案管理,2010(5):55-58.
[24]	安小米,宋懿,马广惠,等.大数据时代数字档案资源整合与服务的机遇与挑战[J].档案学通讯,2017(6):57-62.
[25]	周耀林,常大伟. 我国档案大数据研究的现状分析与趋势探讨[J]. 档案学研究,2017(3):34-40.
[26]	陈忠海,常大伟.档案馆在档案信息资源开发中的主体地位质疑—— 兼论用户在档案信息资源开发中的主体地位[J]. 档案管理,2015(2):4-7.
[27]	常大伟. 档案信息资源开发的理念创新与模式重构[D].郑州大学,2016:12.
[28]	万恩德. 解构与重构:档案信息资源开发模式的后现代转型[J].档案学通讯,2018(1):57-62.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed