Evaluation on the operation risk of dam system in the typical watersheds of Ningxia
WANG Dan, HA Yuling, LI Zhanbin, YU Kunxia, BO Chongde, ZHANG Huwei, SU Liping
1. Key Laboratory of Northwest Water Resources and Environment Ecology of Ministry of Education, Xi'an University of Technology, 710048, Xi'an, China; 2. Ningxia Water Conservancy, 750000, Yinchuan, China
Abstract：[Background] Dilapidated dam will seriously threaten people's life and property safety, therefore, the identification and research of check dam's operation risk is particularly important. [Methods] Selecting Chelugou dam system of Ningxia as the research object, a set of relatively complete evaluation index system of operation risk of both single dam and the whole dam system were extracted and established respectively from four aspects of engineering, management, economy and structure. With the method of improved AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to calculate the index weight, the operation risk of single dam under seven different storm return periods and that of the whole system under the return period of 300 years were calculated and evaluated comprehensively, meanwhile the risk map of temporal and spatial distributionof single dam was made as well. [Results] For the operation risk of single dam, it showed that there were three check dam including Chelugou, Qianzu and Dongzhuangwan, which operation risk grade grew from class Ⅲ(generally dangerous stae) under the occuring period of 10 years to classⅡ(dangerous state) under the occuring period of 50 years, 100 years, 300 years, which need to be taken seriously. On the whole, the project and economic risk of single dam in Chelugou dam system were generally high, which exceeded 0.8 and 0.4 perspectively, that was related to, the majority of dam in Ningxia was given priority to water storage. For the evaluation of dam system, when suffered a heavy rain of period 300 years, the operation risk of Chelugou basin from high to low were as follows:Wangzhao unit(0.51, classⅢ) > Qianzu unit(0.50, classⅢ) > the whole basin(0.44, classⅢ) > Dapin unit(0.39, classⅣ) > Panluwan unit(0.35, classⅣ), meaning that all dam unit were in the generally dangerous state or generally safe state. And from the view of whether dam system unit or the whole basin, the basin were all in a safe state of operation. It could also been seen from the results that the key dam unit was the Wangzhao unit and Qianzu unit which influenced the operation safety of the whole dam system. In addition to building spillway, it was necessary to deal with the damaged parts of dam body as well as water release works as soon as possible to eliminate hidden dangers. [Conclusions] The paper realized the evaluation work of operation risk of single dam, check dam unit as well as the dam system on the whole. These results would provide certain reference to the safety forecast warning of check dam in the region and help the administrative department of rapid decision-making, so as to ensure the safe and stable operation of check dam and lay the foundation for establishing the safety emergency response mechanism and operation measures.
王丹1, 哈玉玲2, 李占斌1, 于坤霞1, 卜崇德2, 张虎威2, 苏立平2. 宁夏典型流域淤地坝系运行风险评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2017, 15(3): 17-25.
WANG Dan, HA Yuling, LI Zhanbin, YU Kunxia, BO Chongde, ZHANG Huwei, SU Liping. Evaluation on the operation risk of dam system in the typical watersheds of Ningxia. SSWC, 2017, 15(3): 17-25.
张恭. 宁夏淤地坝建设灵活多样[J]. 中国水土保持, 2004(1):24. ZHANG Gong. Flexible construction of check dam in Ningxia[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2004(1):24.
[2]
陈广宏. 宁夏淤地坝建设的成效与经验[J]. 中国水土保持, 2005, (4):36. CHEN Guanghong. The effectiveness and experience of check dam's construction in Ningxia[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2005, (4):36.
[3]
陈骞. 小流域坝系建设中的几个问题及建议[J]. 中国水土保持, 2008, (2):55. CHEN Qian. Several problems and suggestions on the construction of dam system in small watershed[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2008, (2):55.
[4]
蒋耿民. 淤地坝坝系工程总体布局综合评价指标体系及模型研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2010:13. JIANG Gengmin. The research about the model and synthetical evaluation index of arrangement of silt arrester system[D]. Yanglin:North West Agriculture and Forestry University, 2010:13.
[5]
王煜, 刘立斌. 淤地坝产权制度改革之管见[J]. 水土保持研究, 2003, (5):27. WANG Yu, LIU Libin. Reflections on the reform of the property rights system of dam[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2003, (5):27.
[6]
王永军. 黄河中游多沙粗沙区坝系工程安全评价方法研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2009:20. WANG Yongjun. Study on the safety evaluation method of dam system in the sandy area of the middle reaches in the Yellow River[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2009:20.
[7]
蒋得江. 黄土高原西部水土保持坝系布局与评价[M]. 郑州:郑州大学出版社, 2010:50. JIANG Dejiang. Distribution and evaluation of dam system of soil and water conservation in the west of the Loess Plateau[M]. Zhengzhou:Zhengzhou University Press, 2010:50.
[8]
陈风光, 姚海林, 史卫国. 模糊综合评价法在堰塞湖风险评估中的应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2011(S1):67. CHEN Fengguang, YAO Hailin, SHI Weiguo. Application of Fuzzy and Synthetic Judgment to Risk Assessment of Dammed Lake[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2011, (S1):67.
[9]
DYER J S. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Management science, 1990, 36(3):249.
[10]
范瑞瑜. 西黑岱沟流域坝系相对稳定性分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2006, 4(2):53. FAN Ruiyu. Relative stability analysis of dam system in Xiheidaigou Watershed[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 4(2):53.
[11]
曹文洪, 胡海华, 吉祖稳. 黄土高原地区淤地坝坝系相对稳定研究[J]. 水利学报, 2007, 38(5):606. CAO Wenhong, HU Haihua, JI Zuwen.Study on the relative stability of check dam system in the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007, 38(5):606.
[12]
辛全才, 沙际德. 淤地坝坝地经济效益预测[J]. 水土保持学报, 1995, 9(2):45. XIN Quancai, SHA Jide. Prediction of check dam's economic benefits[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995, 9(2):45.
[13]
王丹, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等. 韭园沟流域淤地坝坝系布局评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(5):49. WANG Dan, LI Zhanbin, LI Peng, et al. Evaluation of overall distribution of check dam system in the Jiu Yuangou watershed[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 23(5):49.
2017, Vol. 15 
