情报科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 177-185.

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

交叉学科期刊评价研究回顾:基于系统性文献综述

  

  • 出版日期:2024-05-05 发布日期:2024-07-26

  • Online:2024-05-05 Published:2024-07-26

摘要:

【目的/意义】系统性梳理和总结交叉学科期刊评价研究进展,为促进相关理论研究和实践发展提供参考。
【方法/过程】遵循系统性文献综述的范式,从Web of Science和CNKI等多个数据库中检索并筛选得到40篇相关文
献,采取主题分析、时序分析方法、比较研究分析文献资料。【结果/结论】该领域研究主题可归类为交叉学科期刊识
别、评价方法和评价应用。研究发现:国内外交叉学科期刊评价研究呈现出不同的特征。未来研究展望主要包括:
从更综合的角度开发评价指标,并从期刊内容层次进行交叉学科期刊识别;评价指标应向融合转变,并注重构建交
叉学科期刊声誉评价方法;对各类交叉学科期刊开展更为丰富的评价活动,以期展示更加全面的交叉学科期刊评
价图景。【创新/局限】交叉学科期刊评价尚处于发展初期,尤其是交叉学科期刊识别的实证研究较少。随着交叉学
科期刊评价研究领域的继续发展,未来应尽可能纳入更多的文献,开展更丰富的综合述评。

Abstract:

【Purpose/significance】By systematically reviewing and summarizing the progress of cross-disciplinary journal evaluation
research, we expect to provide a reference for promoting related theoretical research and practice development
.
【Method/process】Fol⁃
lowing the paradigm of systematic literature review, 40 relevant papers were searched and screened from several databases such as
Web of Science and CNKI, and thematic,chronological and comparative analyses were adopted to analyze the literature materials.【Re⁃
sult/conclusion】The research themes in this field can be categorized as interdisciplinary journal identification, evaluation methods and
evaluation applications. Evaluation studies of interdisciplinary journals at home and abroad show different characteristics. Prospects
for future research include: developing evaluation indicators from a more comprehensive perspective and identifying interdisciplinary
journals from a deeper level of journal content; integrating evaluation indicators and focusing on building methods for evaluating the
reputation of interdisciplinary journals; richer evaluation activities will be carried out for various interdisciplinary journals in order to
present a more comprehensive picture of interdisciplinary journal evaluation
.
【Innovation/limitation】Research related to interdisciplin⁃
ary journal evaluation is still in the early stages of development, and there are fewer empirical studies of interdisciplinary journal iden⁃
tification in particular. As the field of interdisciplinary journal evaluation research continues to develop, future studies should incorpo⁃
rate as much literature as possible and conduct richer comprehensive reviews.