情报科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 13-20.

• 专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

数据质量评价对象、体系、方法与技术研究进展

  

  • 出版日期:2021-11-01 发布日期:2021-11-15

  • Online:2021-11-01 Published:2021-11-15

摘要: 【目的/意义】本文拟帮助学者在数据质量评价时如何为评价对象选择合适的评价视角、方法和技术,以期提
高数据质量评价结果的准确率和可靠性。【过程/方法】通过文献调研和分析,依据“3W原则”,从评价对象、评价体
系构建视角、评价方法、评价技术等角度对相关研究进行系统梳理和内容述评。在此基础上,将评价对象与评价视
角、评价方法、评价技术或工具进行有机组合,寻求合适匹配。【结果/结论】研究发现,当前研究在评价体系构建和
评价体系应用上存在评价视角“墨守成规”、评价方法“形单影只”、评价指标“查无实据”、应用效果不“尽如人意”等
问题。【创新/局限】总结了国内外数据质量评价研究的理论基础和实践应用,在未来研究中还应进一步探索如何实
现评价对象与评价视角、评价方法、评价技术或工具间的最优匹配。

Abstract: 【Purpose/significance】This paper aims to help scholars choose appropriate evaluation perspectives,methods and techniques
for evaluation objects in data quality evaluation,in order to improve the accuracy and reliability of data quality evaluation results.
【Method/process】Through literature research and analysis,according to the "3W Principle",the relevant studies are systematically sort? ed out and reviewed from the perspectives of evaluation object,evaluation system construction perspective,evaluation methods and eval? uation techniques. On this basis,the evaluation object,the evaluation perspective,the evaluation method,the evaluation technique or the tool are combined organically to seek the suitable match.【Result/conclusion】It is found that the current research has some problems in the construction and application of the evaluation system,such as "conformism" in the evaluation perspective,"singularity" in the evalu? ation method,"unsubstantiated" in the evaluation index,and "unsatisfactory" in the application effect.【Innovation/limitation】The theo? retical basis and practical application of data quality evaluation studies at home and abroad are summarized. In the future research, how to achieve the optimal match between evaluation objects and evaluation perspectives,evaluation methods,evaluation techniques or tools should be further explored.