情报科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 185-193.

• 综述 • 上一篇    

国内外智库评价研究进展

  

  • 出版日期:2021-06-01 发布日期:2021-06-25

  • Online:2021-06-01 Published:2021-06-25

摘要: 【目的/意义】智库评价是智库研究的重要内容,国内外学界在智库评价的实践方面已较为成熟,但在理论 方面尚未形成具有权威性的统一标准。然而,智库评价的研究是实践先于理论的,所以对国内外智库评价实践案 例的分析和归纳有助于智库评价理论的进步。【方法/过程】本文以国内外智库评价领域的相关文献和案例为研究 对象,从发布时间、所属学科、关键词分布及评价特点等方面对文献和案例进行归纳和可视化分析,从国内外智库 评价案例所采用的方法、评价体系、评价主客体及各自的特色和创新点入手,根据定性研究和定量研究分类,按照 时间序列进行述评。【结果/结论】本文探讨了国内外智库评价研究的特色和不足,提出了促进智库评价理论研究与 实践发展的策略。通过对国内外智库评价案例的分析,本文发现无论是国内还是国外,智库评价的实践案例已较 为丰富,缺少专门针对智库评价的评价科学理论、方法与应用体系的研究,缺乏整体上的系统研究,缺少具有普适 性和权威性的评价标准。本文建议构建智库评价的科学理论框架,研发透明公开化的、面向大数据和人工智能时 代的智库评价模型和方法。【创新/局限】这些策略为我国智库评价领域形成更加科学、客观的评价报告提供参考。

Abstract: 【Purpose/significance】Think tank evaluation is an important part of think tank research. Both domestic and overseas think tank evaluation practice has made great achievements, but theoretically, an authoritative and unified standard of this evaluation has not formed yet. Since the practice goes far beyond the theoretical research, the analysis and induction of domestic and foreign think tank evaluation practice cases will contribute to the progress of think tank evaluation theory.【Method/process】This paper takes rele⁃ vant literature and cases in the field of think tank evaluation at home and abroad as the research object, and summarizes and visually analyzes the literature and cases from the aspects of release time, discipline, keyword distribution and evaluation characteristics, etc. Given their method, evaluation systems, evaluation subjects, evaluation objects, and their respective characteristics and innovative points, this paper makes classification of qualitative and quantitative researches, giving a chronological review. 【Result/conclusion】 By summarizing the methods and characteristics of think tank evaluation at home and abroad, this paper discusses the characteristics and deficiencies of think tank evaluation researches at home and abroad, proposing some strategies to promote the development of the theoretical researches and practice of think tank evaluation.【Innovation/limitation】These strategies provide references for the forma⁃ tion of more scientific and objective evaluation reports in the evaluation field of think tanks in my country.