英国规制异常查档的特点和启示—《中华人民共和国档案法》修订施行引发的思考

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.02.019

档案学研究

2021, Vol. 35

Issue (2): 132-135 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.02.019

境外学术研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

英国规制异常查档的特点和启示—《中华人民共和国档案法》修订施行引发的思考

贺宇, 孙晓红, 张晓雷, 王雅婷

天津市和平区档案馆天津 300041

Characteristics and Enlightenment of Abnormal Archives Retrieval in UK Regulations: Reflections on the Rivision and Implementation of Archives Law of the People's Republic of China

HE Yu, SUN Xiaohong, ZHANG Xiaolei, WANG Yating

Archives of Tianjin Heping District,Tianjin 300041

输出:BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要: 英国对异常查档采取严格的制度规制,国家法律和国家档案馆规章对异常查档的认定和处置都有详细规定。英国规制异常查档在知情权放开和约束、法规制度体系、认定标准和处置措施、监督和救济制度等方面具有鲜明特点。结合修订施行的《中华人民共和国档案法》关于档案利用权的条款,提出对我国规制异常查档的启示。

Abstract：The United Kingdom adopts strict regulations on abnormal archives retrieval, and the national laws and the National Archives regulations have detailed provisions on the identification and disposal of abnormal archives retrieval. The United Kingdom's regulations on abnormal archives retrieval have distinct characteristics in the liberalization and restriction of the right to know, the system of laws and regulations, the identification standards and disposal measures, and the supervision and relief institutions. Combined with the provisions of the revised Archives Law of the People's Republic of China on the right to use archives, this article proposes enlightenment to China's regulations on abnormal archives retrieval.

出版日期: 2021-04-15

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

贺宇, 孙晓红, 张晓雷, 王雅婷. 英国规制异常查档的特点和启示—《中华人民共和国档案法》修订施行引发的思考[J]. 档案学研究, 2021, 35(2): 132-135.
HE Yu, SUN Xiaohong, ZHANG Xiaolei, WANG Yating. Characteristics and Enlightenment of Abnormal Archives Retrieval in UK Regulations: Reflections on the Rivision and Implementation of Archives Law of the People's Republic of China. Archives Science Study, 2021, 35(2): 132-135.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2021.02.019 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2021/V35/I2/132

[1] 后向东. 信息公开申请权滥用:成因、研判与规制—基于国际经验与中国实际的视角[J]. 人民司法,2015(15):10-13.
[2] The National Archives. Freedom of Information Act 2000[EB/OL].[2019-9-12]. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36.
[3] Information Commissioner's Office. Dealing with Vexatious Requests[EB/OL].[2019-10-6]. https://ico.org.uk/media/1198/dealing-with-vexatious-requests.pdf.
[4] Information Commissioner's Office. Dealing with Repeat Requests[EB/OL].[2019-10-6]. https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1195/dealing-with-repeat-requests.pdf.
[5] Information Commissioner's Office. Guide to Freedom of Information [EB/OL].[2019-10-15]. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-freedom-of-information/.
[6] The National Archives.Guidance on Vexatious or Repeated Requests Made under The Freedom of Information Act[EB/OL].[2019-10-19].https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/vexatious-guidance.pdf.
[7] The National Archives.Policy for Handling Unreasonably Persistent Enquiries[EB/OL].[2019-10-19].https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/persistent-enquiries-policy.pdf.
[8] 曹宇,赖文渊. 英国国家档案法律体系概述[J]. 辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011(5):73-80.
[9] 周汉华. 杜绝政府信息公开申请权滥用[J]. 人民论坛,2019(5):84-86.
[10] 孙铭伟. 查档高峰暴露出的问题对策[J]. 档案与建设,2020(3):57-58.
[11] 王正兴,刘闯. 英国的信息自由法与政府信息共享[J]. 科学学研究,2006(5):688-695.
[12] 熊健怡. 城建档案利用纠纷的类型分析及其防范措施[J]. 城建档案,2020(2):49-50.
[13] 彭移风. 公众利用档案过程的消极心理及对策研究[J]. 浙江档案,2016(3):11-13.
[14] 陈波,叶勇. 浅谈档案利用服务趋势及其风险防控[J]. 四川档案,2016(5):39-40.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed