Please wait a minute...
档案学研究  2018, Vol. 32 Issue (6): 138-144    DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.06.023
  境外学术交流 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
国外档案多元论的发展及其启示
李子林
中国人民大学信息资源管理学院 北京 100872
The Development of Archival Multiverse and Pluralism Abroad and the Implications
Zilin LI
School of Information Resources Management,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872
全文: HTML    PDF(1022 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

21世纪以来,档案多元论逐渐走入档案界的视野。西方后现代主义思潮为档案多元现象及档案多元论研究提供了哲学和方法论指导。以美国为首的欧美国家历史、文化、社会学研究的开展对档案工作提出新要求,直接推动档案多元论观点的形成和发展。当前,国外档案多元论研究的主题包括：档案多元论视域下档案馆业务拓展、电子文件管理和长期保存、社会记忆及非主流社会群体文化构建、全球档案研究与教育活动的发展。档案多元论对我国档案馆业务工作革新、少数民族档案资源的保存与开发、档案学研究活动的多元化与社会化发展、档案教育及人才培养模式创新具有重要的启示意义。
Abstract：

Since the twenty-first century, archival multiverse and pluralism has gradually entered the field of archival science community. Western postmodernism thought provided philosophical and methodological guidance for archival multiverse phenomena and archival pluralism research. Additionally, the development of historical, cultural and sociological research of European and American countries, led by the United States, puts forward new requirements for archival work, which directly promotes the formation and development of archival multiverse and pluralism. At present, the main topics of archival multiverse and pluralism at abroad include: archives work development, electronic records management and long-term preservation, social memory and cultural construction of non-mainstream social community, global archives research and education activities in archival multiverse. Archival multiverse and pluralism is of great significance to the innovation of archives works, preservation and exploitation of minority’s archives, divsersification and socialization of archival research activities and innovation of archives education and talent training mode in China.
出版日期: 2019-01-09
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
引用本文:

李子林. 国外档案多元论的发展及其启示[J]. 档案学研究, 2018, 32(6): 138-144.
Zilin LI. The Development of Archival Multiverse and Pluralism Abroad and the Implications. Archives Science Study, 2018, 32(6): 138-144.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.06.023      或      http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2018/V32/I6/138

[1] www.oed.com.[EB/OL].[2017-07-07].
[2] Gilliland A.&Kemmish S.Pluralising the archives in the multiverse: a report on work in progress[J].Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice,2011(21):177-185.
[3] Gilliland A.& McKemmish S.Pluralising the archives in the multiverse: a report on work in progress[J]. Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice,2011(21):177-185.
[4] 安小米,郝春红.国外档案多元论研究及其启示[J].北京档案2014(11):16-20.
[5] 徐拥军. 档案记忆观的理论与实践[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2017,7:60-61.
[6] Robert M.Waener and Francis X. Blouin, JR,“Documenting the Great Migrations and a Century of Ethnicity in America”, The American Archivist, vol.39.No.3(July 1976),pp.319-328.
[7] Montalto N.V. The challenge of preservation in a pluralistic society[J]. American Archivist, 1978, 41(4):399-404.
[8] Anne Gilliland, Sue Mckemmish.Building an Infrastructure for Archival Research[J].Archival Science, Volume 4, Issue 3-4(December 2004), pp.149-197.
[9] Gilliland A.Conceptualizing Twenty-First Century Archives[M]. Chicago: SAA, 2013.
[10] Anne Gilliland, Sue Mckemmish.Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts[M]. Williamson, K. & Johanson, G. (eds.) Tilde Publishing, Prahran, Victoria. pp.79-112.
[11] et al.Andersen K.Educating for the Archival Multiverse[J]. American Archivist, 2011,74(1):69-101.
[12] Terry Cook.“Evidence, Memory, Identity, and Community: Four Shifting Archival Paradigms”, Archival Science, vol.13(June 2013), pp. 95-120.
[13] Gilliland A.& McKemmish S. Pluralising the archives in the multiverse: a report on work in progress[J]. Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice,2011(21):177-185.
[14] Carol Couture.“Archival Appraisal: A Status Report”, Archivaria 59(Spring 2005), pp. 84.
[15] Ian Johnston“Whose History Is It Anyway?”Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 22, no. 2(October 2001), pp. 213-29.
[16] Ananda Mitra“Marginal Voices in Cyberspace”, New Media & Society, vol. 3, no.1(2001),pp.31.
[17] Katie Shilton and Ramesh Srinivasan“Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections”, Archivaria63(Spring 2007),p.18.
[18] ISO 23081-1:2006. (2006). Metadata for records, Part 1. International Standards Organization.
[19] Gilliland, Anne and Kelvin White. Digital recordkeeping in support of social inclusion in an society.Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference e-Society(2009).
[20] Yanyuwa families with John Bradley, Amanda Kearney, Tom Chandler, Brent Mckee, and Chandara Ung.Sydney Myer Foundation and Monash University.[EB/OL].[2017-9-10]..
[21] Gilliland A.& McKemmish S.September.Recordkeeping metadata, the archival multiverse, and societal grand challenges[R].In DC-2012, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.
[22] McKemmish S. & Piggott M.Toward the archival multiverse: Challenging the binary opposition of the personal and corporate archive in modern archival theory and practice[J].Archivaria, 2013(76):111-144.
[23] Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality: Volume 1, Penguin Group Australia,CamberwellVictoria,2008.
[24] Barbara Reed,“Access Today”,Recordkeeping Roundtable, 2013, .
[25] Joanne Evans, Sue McKemmish and Barbara Reed, ‘Making Metadata Matter: Outcomes From the Clever Recordkeeping Metadata Project’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol.37, no. 1, 2009, pp.28-56.
[26] For example, symposia were held at UCLA and Monash University in 2007;forums and panel discussions at SAA Annual Meetings in 2007, 2008, and 2009; the International Council on Archives Conference in Malaysia, the Association of Library and Information Science Educators, and the Society of California Archivists in 2008; and the iSchools Conference in 2009.
[27] The Archival Education and Research Institute(AERI),Pluralizing the Archival Curriculum Group(PACG),“Educationg for the Archival Multiverse,”The American Archivist,vol.74.No.1(Spring/Summer 2011),pp.69-101.
[28] Gilliland A, Lau A, Lu Y, et al.Pluralizing the archival paradigm through education: critical discussions around the Pacific Rim[J]. Archives and Manuscripts, 2007,35(2),p.10.
[29] The Archival Education and Research Institute(AERI),Pluralizing the Archival Curriculum Group(PACG),“Educationg for the Archival Multiverse,”The American Archivist,vol.74.No.1(Spring/Summer 2011),pp.69-101.
[30] 王玉珏,刘佳欣. 国外档案馆跨界合作模式及启示[J]. 档案学通讯2017(02):91-94.
[31] 王玉珏,杨太阳. 法国档案馆公众教育服务体系建设及其启示[J].档案学研究2016(05):103-109.
[32] 王丽. 论档案在边疆多民族地区社会秩序建构中的文化功能:基于档案多元论的阐释[J].档案学通讯2016(4):100-103.
[33] 华林,朱天梅,杨诗琦. 云南省国家综合档案馆少数民族档案资源建设述评[J].档案学通讯2016(6):71-74.
[34] Yanyuwa families with John Bradley, Amanda Kearney, Tom Chandler, Brent Mckee, and Chandara Ung.Sydney Myer Foundation and Monash University.[EB/OL].[2017-9-10]..
[35] Yanyuwa families with John Bradley, Amanda Kearney, Tom Chandler, Brent Mckee, and Chandara Ung.Sydney Myer Foundation and Monash University.[EB/OL].[2017-9-10]..
[36] 安小米,郝春红.国外档案多元论研究及其启示[J].北京档案2014(11):16-20.
No related articles found!
版权所有 ©《档案学研究》编辑部 | 联系我们
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持：support@magtech.com.cn