Please wait a minute...
档案学研究  2023, Vol. 37 Issue (1): 57-65    DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2023.01.007
  档案法规标准 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
档案行政诉讼裁判结果影响因素研究——基于342份司法裁判文书的实证研究
张健,许颖,周念九
江苏大学法学院 镇江 212013
Research on the Influencing Factors of the Judgment Results of Archival Administrative Litigation:An Empirical Study Based on 342 Judicial Documents
ZHANG Jian,XU Ying,ZHOU Nianjiu
School of Law, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013
全文: HTML    PDF(1038 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要: 

行政诉讼日益成为解决公民、法人等与档案主管部门之间争议的主要途径,构成当事人权益保护的重要制度保障。本文基于2000年以来342份档案行政诉讼裁判文书进行实证研究,讨论我国档案行政诉讼的发展趋势及主要特点,并进一步分析考察档案行政诉讼裁判结果的影响因素。结果表明:法院级别、被告级别、原告有无聘请律师、原告是否提供证据、被告是否含有档案馆与裁判结果存在显著的相关关系。本文基于上述研究结果为完善档案行政诉讼制度和档案管理制度提出对策:未来应当加大对原告的保护力度,完善档案行政复议制度,健全档案行政诉讼证据制度,明确档案行政诉讼受案范围和档案主管部门职责,深化档案主管部门服务职能。

关键词 档案行政诉讼SPSS档案主管部门胜诉率    
Abstract

Administrative litigation has increasingly become the main way to resolve disputes between citizens or legal persons and archives competent departments, which is a key institutional guarantee for the parties' rights and interests. Based on 342 adjudication documents of archival administrative litigation since 2000, this paper discusses the development trend and main characteristics of archival administrative litigation in China, and further analyzes the factors that affect adjudication results of archival administrative litigation. The research shows that the judgment result is significantly correlated with the court level, the defendant level, whether the plaintiff has hired a lawyer, whether the plaintiff has provided evidence and whether the defendant contains archives or not. Based on the above research results, a series of countermeasures are put forward to improve the archives administrative litigation system and the archives management system: the protection of the plaintiff should be strengthened, the system of archival administrative reconsideration and the system of archival administrative litigation evidence should be improved, the scope of accepting cases of archival administrative litigation and the responsibilities of archives competent department should be clarified, and the service functions of archives competent department should be deepened.

Key wordsarchival administrative litigation    SPSS    archives competent department    success rate
出版日期: 2024-02-22
引用本文:

张健, 许颖, 周念九. 档案行政诉讼裁判结果影响因素研究——基于342份司法裁判文书的实证研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2023, 37(1): 57-65.
ZHANG Jian, XU Ying, ZHOU Nianjiu. Research on the Influencing Factors of the Judgment Results of Archival Administrative Litigation:An Empirical Study Based on 342 Judicial Documents. Archives Science Study, 2023, 37(1): 57-65.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2023.01.007      或      http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2023/V37/I1/57

[1] [3] 陈忠海, 吴雁平. 档案行政诉讼若干理论问题探讨[J]. 档案学研究, 2016(1):32-37.
[2] 肖阳. 档案行政诉讼[J]. 档案, 1990(6):17-18.
[4] 马秋影. 档案行政诉讼案件实证研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2016(5):27-31.
[5] 姚明. 我国档案行政诉讼案件研究—基于中国裁判文书网545份裁判文书的实证考察[J]. 浙江档案, 2020(9):53-54.
[6] 马秋影. 行政复议体制改革对档案行政管理工作的挑战及对策研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2021(3):47-50.
[7] 北京市第二中级人民法院行政判决书(2017)京02行终436号[EB/OL]. [2017-04-26]. https://www.pkulaw.com/pfnl/a25051f3312b07f313bb078374a503e395b2824247bea5c8bdfb.html.
[8] 丁晓华. 行政诉讼原告权益保护制度研究—兼论《行政诉讼法修正案(草案)》的完善[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2014(5):14-21.
[9] 上海市浦东新区人民法院行政判决书(2014)浦行初字第100号[EB/OL]. [2014-04-11]. https://www.pkulaw.com/pfnl/a6bdb3332ec0adc48caf6b37e044006edc7ed4b4c2c5cf5cbdfb.html.
[10] 王敬波. 行政复议委员会是行政复议体制改革的靶点[J]. 中国司法, 2022(2):71-73.
[11] 黄学贤. 行政复议委员会机制新论[J]. 苏州大学学报(法学版), 2021(2):1-8.
[12] 章志远. 行政复议与行政诉讼衔接关系新论—基于解决行政争议视角的观察[J]. 法律适用, 2017(23):27-31.
[13] 陈海萍. 行政诉讼起诉条件的规范缺陷与修正[J]. 行政法学研究, 2020(1):89-100.
[14] 河北省唐山市中级人民法院行政裁定书(2019)冀02行终29号[EB/OL]. [2019-05-17]. https://www.pkulaw.com/pfnl/a6bdb3332ec0adc41ded0d6b83d0518f5b62d3b4209ac953bdfb.html.
[15] 赵黎霞. 美国档案公开对我国档案管理的启示[J]. 档案管理, 2012(6):52-53.
[16] 熊回香, 李昕然, 代沁泉. 基于用户画像的数字档案馆个性化服务研究[J]. 浙江档案, 2021(7):41-44.
[17] 陈慧, 王晓晓, 吴国娇. 基于物联网的档案个性化知识服务模式:特征与问题探析[J]. 北京档案, 2019(3):10-14.
[18] 刘希娟. 数字档案馆建设研究[J]. 黑龙江档案, 2021(3):90-91.
[1] 李海涛, 杨晗, 宋琳琳. 我国档案主管部门与档案社会组织关系重构研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2023, 37(1): 49-56.
[2] 陈忠海, 吴雁平. 档案行政诉讼若干理论问题探讨[J]. 档案学研究, 2016, 30(1): 32-37.