比较法视域下的我国法定“公共档案”定义方法探析

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2017.01.01

档案学研究

2017, Vol. 31

Issue (1): 4-10 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2017.01.01

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

比较法视域下的我国法定“公共档案”定义方法探析

陈忠海, 杨欢欢

郑州大学信息管理学院河南郑州 450001

Exploration about Defining Methods of Chinese Legal Public Archives from the Perspective of Comparison

Zhonghai Chen, Huanhuan Yang

School of Information Management of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,450001

全文:

HTML

PDF(1815 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要:

借鉴外国档案法律法规对“公共档案”定义的经验,总结外国法定“公共档案”定义的共性和差异,分析各国在定义“公共档案”的所有权归属倾向、立法定位、保存与管理主体的确立,以及保存时间和公开利用限制的规定等五个方面产生差异的原因,在此基础上,从形成者与形成过程、价值、特点、属概念以及与其他法律法规协调等五个方面对定义我国“公共档案”的方法提出建议。

Abstract：

This paper is mainly based on foreign public archives laws and acts. By learning from foreign definitions of public archives, it summarizes the commonness and differences among these concepts, such as archival ownership, legislation orientation of public archives, the main body of archival preservation and management, provisions on the restrictions about archival storage time, disclosure and vitalization and other differences on public archives, and the reasons behind them are explored as well. Finally, this paper puts forward suggestions on how to establish concept of public archives from five aspects: former and formation process, value, characteristics, attributive concept and coordinating with legal system.

出版日期: 2017-12-26

基金资助:本文为2013年度国家社科基金项目《依法治档研究》（项目编号：13BTQ068）的阶段成果

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

陈忠海, 杨欢欢. 比较法视域下的我国法定“公共档案”定义方法探析[J]. 档案学研究, 2017, 31(1): 4-10.
Zhonghai Chen, Huanhuan Yang. Exploration about Defining Methods of Chinese Legal Public Archives from the Perspective of Comparison. Archives Science Study, 2017, 31(1): 4-10.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2017.01.01 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2017/V31/I1/4

[1]	政策法规司.国家档案局关于《中华人民共和国档案法》修订草案(送审稿)公开征求意见的公告[EB/OL].(2016-05-25)[2016-06-03]..
[2]	英美等国家“Act”一般仅指一部法律,与“Law”所表示的“一系列的法律(a series of acts, rather than one)”的概念有本质区别.因此,本表将英国和加拿大两国特设的公共档案法律翻译为“法案”而不是“法”.此处翻译与《外国档案法规选编》一书中的翻译不同.
[3]	[6][7][9][10][11][12][13][15][16][17][18] [19][20][22] 中国档案学会对外联络部,《档案学通讯》编辑部.外国档案法规选编[M].北京:档案出版社.1983:12,26,58,67,134~135,136~137,137,195,198,133,153,59,130,137,70,138.
[5]	曹梅林. 斯里兰卡国家档案工作简介[J].四川档案,1990(02):4.
[8]	Legislation.gov.uk. Public Records Act 1958[EB/OL].[2016-05-30]..
[14]	郑锦霞. 百年档案定义略论——兼论我国文件与档案关系问题[J].档案管理,2007(01):32-34.
[21]	Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978.[EB/OL].[2016-05-30]..
[23]	刘智勇.我国现有档案定义的缺陷[J].档案学研究,1995(04):21-23+11.
[24]	丁海斌,李娟.从信息划分与定义规则出发再谈档案定义[J].档案,2011(06):6-9.
[25]	陈忠海. 公共档案馆理论研究评析[J].档案学研究,2010(01):9-11.
[26]	郭红解. 析公共档案馆[J].中国档案,2007(2):30.
[27]	Legislation and regulations.[EB/OL].[2016-05-30].ment/legislation/.
[28]	Public Records Act-frequently asked questions.[EB/OL]..[2016-05-30]..

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed