|
|
|
| Influences of root distribution on the soil water characteristics and permeability characteristics of shallow root-bearing soil in the burned areas |
| YAN Xiangjun, WANG Yunqi, QI Zihan, HE Xiangchang, LI Kewen, LUO Pizhao |
1. Three-Gorges Reservoir Area(Chongqing) Forest Ecosystem Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China;
2. Three-Gorges Reservoir Area(Chongqing) Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Ministry of Education, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract [Background] A forest fire occurred in Hutou village, Xiema street, Beibei district, Jinyun Mountain National Nature Reserve, Chongqing.In order to further study the harm caused by forest fires and promote their post-disaster reconstruction, the author carried out an investigation in the burned area of Jinyun Mountain Nature Reserve, collected soil samples to determine the saturated permeability coefficient and soil-water characteristic curve of soil, and studied the response mechanism of fire process to soil hydraulic characteristics, in order to provide reference for the prevention and control of geological disasters in the burned areas.[Methods] The basic physical properties such as liquid limit, bulk density and saturated water content under different fire degrees were measured by equilibrium cone method and ring knife method. The saturated permeability coefficient ks of shallow root soil was measured by soil variable head permeability test. The particle size distribution curve was measured by laser particle size analyzer and the soil water characteristic curve was fitted based on van-Genuchten (VG) model.[Results] 1) After the forest fire, the bulk density, saturated water content, liquid limit, porosity and other physical properties of the shallow surface soil increased, and the number of roots in the burned area decreased. Among them, the number of fine roots 0-2 mm changed the most, which decreased by about 2-3 times. 2) For the three degrees of mild, moderate and severe fire, the saturated permeability coefficient of Pinus massoniana forest and Phyllostachys pubescens forest increased after fire. In particular, the permeability coefficient of the surface soil in the severely burned area of P. massoniana forest increased by 58.26 times compared with that of the unburned shallow soil, and the permeability coefficient of the surface soil in the severely burned area of P. pubescens forest increased by 162.24 times. 3) The results showed that the soil particle size in the fire area was smaller than that in the non-fire area, and the air intake value parameter α and the pore size distribution parameter n of the soil water characteristic curve of the shallow root soil in the fire area decreased with the increase of the degree of fire, and the pore size distribution parameter n increased with the increase of the degree of fire.[Conclusions] Forest fires lead to a decrease in the number of fine roots in the surface soil and an uneven distribution in the soil layer, and affect the physical properties of the surface soil, so that the pore size distribution changes, which further leads to the increase of the saturated permeability coefficient and the weakening of the water holding capacity. In the post-disaster recovery of geological disasters in burned areas, the response mechanism of the above soil hydraulic characteristics should be considered.
|
|
Received: 15 November 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
张杰. 降雨条件下边坡入渗及稳定性的影响因子分析[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2014: 2. ZHANG Jie. The impact factor analysis on infiltration and slope stability under rainfall[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2014: 2.
|
| [2] |
于振江,胡卸文,曹希超.火烧迹地土壤斥水特性研究及其对火后泥石流诱发机理[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2020,31(2):93. YU Zhenjiang, HU Xiewen, CAO Xichao. Research on the soil water repellency in burned area and its inducing effect on debris post-fire debris flow [J].Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2020,31(2):93.
|
| [3] |
WANG Ya, HU Xiewen, JIN Tao. Research on the influence depth of soil with different burn severity in the burned areas of E'gu village in Yajiang county[J]. Earth Sciences,2019,8(6):317.
|
| [4] |
王严,胡卸文,杨瀛,等.火烧迹地土壤斥水性和渗透性变化特性[J].水文地质工程地质,2019,46(6):40. WANG Yan, HU Xiewen, YANG Ying, et al. Research on the change in soil water repellency and permeability in burned areas[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2019,46(6):40.
|
| [5] |
赵建芳,汪丙国,廖嘉琦,等.基于野外Guelph入渗法与室内变水头达西法的土壤饱和渗透系数变化规律[J].地质科技情报,2019,38(2):235. ZHAO Jianfang, WANG Bingguo, LIAO Jiaqi, et al. Variation law of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity based in field Guelph infiltration method and indoor variable head Darcy method [J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(2):235.
|
| [6] |
潘登丽,倪万魁,等.基于VG模型确定土水特征曲线基本参数[J].工程地质学报,2020,28(1):69. PAN Dengli, NI Wankui, et al. Determination of soil-water characteristic curve variables based on VG model[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2020,28 (1):69.
|
| [7] |
蒋希雁,杨尚青,冯峰,等.植被根系对土体渗透特性影响的试验研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2022,45(3):370. JIANG Xiyan, YANG Shangqing, FENG Feng, et al. Experimental study on the influence of vegetation roots on soil permeability[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 2022,45 (3):370.
|
| [8] |
秦倩倩,邱聪,郑大柽,等.油松人工林火烧迹地早期土壤入渗动态[J].植物生态学报,2021,45(8):903. QIN Qianqian, QIU Cong, ZHENG Dacheng, et al. Soil infiltration dynamics in early period of a post-fire Pinus tabulaeformis plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2021, 45(8):903.
|
| [9] |
陈卫金,程东会,陶伟.van Genuchten模型参数的物理意义[J].水文地质工程地质,2017,44(6):147. CHEN Weijin, CHENG Donghui, TAO Wei. Physical significance of the parameters in the van Genuchten model [J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2017,44(6):147.
|
| [10] |
SWEZY D M, AGEE J K. Prescribed-fire effects on fine-root and tree mortality inold-growth ponderosa pine[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1991,21(5):626.
|
| [11] |
VERGANI C, SCHWARZ M, SOLDATI M, et al. Root reinforcement dynamics in subalpine spruce forests following timber harvest: A case study in Canton Schwyz, Switzerland[J]. Catena,2016,143:275.
|
| [12] |
王严,胡卸文,杨瀛,等.火烧迹地土壤斥水性和渗透性变化特性[J].水文地质工程地质,2019,46(6):40. WANG Yan, HU Xiewen, YANG Ying, et al. Research on the change in soil water repellency and permeability in burned areas [J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2019,46(6):40.
|
| [13] |
王俊杰,卢孝志,邱珍锋,等.粗粒土渗透系数影响因素试验研究[J].水利水运工程学报,2013(6):16. WANG Junjie, LU Xiaozhi, QIU Zhenfeng, et al. Experimental study on influencing factors of permeability coefficient of coarse-grained soil [J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2013 (6):16.
|
| [14] |
王鑫皓,王云琦,马超,等.根系构型对土壤渗透性能的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(4):73. WANG Xinhao, WANG Yunqi, MA Chao, et al. Effect of root architecture on soil permeability [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,16(4):73.
|
| [15] |
宋维峰,陈丽华,刘秀萍.林木根系固土的理论基础[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(6):180. SONG Weifeng, CHEN Lihua, LIU Xiuping. Review of theories of soil reinforcement by root system in forest [J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008,28(6):180.
|
| [16] |
吕殿青,邵明安,王全九.土壤持水特征测定中的容重变化及其确定方法[J].水利学报,2003(3):110. Lü Dianqing, SHAO Ming'an, WANG Quanjiu. Variation of bulk density and its determination method in determination of soil water-holding characteristics [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003(3):110.
|
| [17] |
雷鸣宇,崔一飞,倪钧钧,等.浅层滑坡型火后泥石流起动机理研究进展与案例分析[J].工程地质学报,2021,29(3):786. LEI Mingyu, CUI Yifei, NI Junjun, et al. Actuality and case study on mechanism of post-fire debris flow initiated by shallow landslide[J].Journal of Engineering Geology, 2021, 29(3):786.
|
| [18] |
祁子寒,王云琦,王玉杰,等.根系对浅表层土大孔隙分布特征及饱和渗透性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):94. QI Zihan, WANG Yunqi, WANG Yujie, et al. Effect of root system on macropores distribution and saturated permeability of surface soil [J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(5): 94.
|
| [19] |
廖红建,刘少华,何玉琪,等.黄土孔径和持水特性的分形维数研究[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2022,52(3):416. LIAO Hongjian, LIU Shaohua, HE Yuqi, et al. Study on fractal dimension of pore size and water retention characteristics of loess[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2022,52(3): 416.
|
|
|
|
