|
|
Factors affecting the initial runoff time of Platycladus orientalis plantation hillslope in Beijing mountainous area |
JIANG Qiuling1, XIN Zhongbao1,2, YU Xinxiao1,2, FAN Dengxing1,2 |
1. School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China;
2. Beijing Engineering Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China |
|
|
Abstract [Background] The rainfall in Beijing is mainly concentrated in summer and autumn, and it usually falls in high intensity, which makes the mountainous area of Beijing become a region prone to mountain torrents and sediment flow disaster. These natural disasters have caused huge losses to the infrastructure and people's lives and property in the mountainous areas of Beijing. Over the past few decades, Beijing has carried out a large number of water conservation forests in mountainous areas. Forest vegetation plays an important role in conserving water sources, reducing flood peak flow and delaying flood time. Defining the initial runoff time of the forest hillslope and its influencing factors can promote the understanding of watershed runoff and confluence, and provide guidance for rational allocation of soil and water conservation measures.[Methods] The hillslope of Platycladus orientalis plantation in mountainous areas of Beijing was selected as the object of this study. Eight plots with different slope length (1, 2 and 5 m) were built and three rainfall intensities (70, 92 and 126 mm/h) and two types of hillslope treatment (litter-covered plots and bare-soil plots) were implemented. Total of 48 artificial simulated rainfall events were carried out in the field in order to study the effect of factors such as rainfall intensity, litter and slope length on the initial runoff time of the Platycladus orientalis plantation hillslope.[Results] 1) Rainfall intensity was the dominant factor that determined the initial runoff time of hillslope. The initial runoff time decreased rapidly with the rainfall intensity decreasing, and there was a significant power function relationship between them. 2) Litter obviously delayed the beginning of runoff. When the rainfall intensity was 70 mm/h, runoff in the 1 m long plots did not occur for 60 min rainfall under the cover of litter, while the average initial runoff time in 1 m long plots was 480±174 s under bare soil. The average initial runoff time of litter-covered plots under other rainfall intensities and slope length was 139 s longer than that of bare-soil plots. 3) With the increase of slope length, the initial runoff time of the litter-covered plots and bare-soil plots both showed a decreasing trend. 4) The initial runoff time of P. orientalis plantation hillslope was mainly affected by rainfall intensity and litter, and their contribution rates to the initial runoff time were 59.8% and 23.9%, respectively.[Conclusions] The main factors influencing the initial runoff time of P. orientalis plantation hillslope are rainfall intensity and litter, and the litter layer in the mountainous areas of Beijing plays an important role in slowing the runoff formation when heavy rain occurs.
|
Received: 05 November 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
刘勇宏,刘昭阳,王学勇.华北土石山区典型坡地的产流特征[J]. 河北林业科技, 2012(3):1 LIU Yonghong, LIU Zhaoyang, WANG Xueyong. Runoff characteristics of typical slope land in the rocky mountainous area of North China[J]. Hebei Forestry Science and Technology, 2012(3):1.
|
[2] |
张翼夫, 李洪文, 何进, 等. 玉米秸轩覆盖对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(7):118. ZHANG Yifu, LI Hongwen, HE Jin, et al. Effects of maize straw mulching on runoff and sediment process of slope[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015, 31(7):118.
|
[3] |
WEI Wei, JIA Fuyan, Yang Lei, et al. Effects of surficial condition and rainfall intensity on runoff in a loess hilly area, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 513(1):115.
|
[4] |
刘希林, 唐川, 张大林. 野外模拟崩岗崩积体坡面产流过程及水分分布[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(11):179. LIU Xilin, TANG Chuan, ZHANG Dalin. Simulated runoff processes on colluvial deposits of Liantanggang Benggang and their water Distributions[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015, 31(11):179.
|
[5] |
陈吉虎. 北京市"7·21"特大暴雨对城市水土保持和监测工作的启示[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(6):313. CHEN Jihu. Enlightenment of torrential rains on 21st July in Beijing city on urben soil and water conservation and monitoring[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(6):313.
|
[6] |
WON C H, YONG H C, MIN H S, et al. Effects of rice straw mats on runoff and sediment discharge in a laboratory rainfall simulation[J]. Geoderma, 2012, 189-190(6):164.
|
[7] |
司登宇, 张金池, 闵俊杰, 等. 模拟降雨条件下苏南黄壤产流起始时间及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013, 27(5):184. SI Dengyu, ZHANG Jinchi, MIN Junjie, et al. The factors affecting the starting time of the slope runoff based on the rainfall simulation for the yellow soil in south Jiangsu[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2013, 27(5):184.
|
[8] |
张光辉, 梁一民. 黄土丘陵区人工草地径流起始时间研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 1995,9(3):78. ZHANG Guanghui, LIANG Yimin. Study on runoff beginning time of artificial grassland in loess hilly region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995,9(3):78.
|
[9] |
袁建平, 蒋定生, 甘淑. 影响坡地降雨产流历时的因子分析[J]. 山地学报, 1999,17(3):68. YUAN Jianping, JIANG Dingsheng, GAN Shu. Factors affecting rainfall-runoff duration on sloping land[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 1999,17(3):68.
|
[10] |
李洪丽, 韩兴, 张志丹, 等. 东北黑土区野外模拟降雨条件下产流产沙研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(4):49. LI Hongli, HAN Xing, ZHANG Zhidan, et al. Research on runoff and erosion sediment under simulated rainfall conditions of black soil in Northeast China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 27(4):49.
|
[11] |
张祯尧, 孙佳美, 余新晓, 等. 栓皮栎林下枯落物减流减沙效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(3):55. ZHANG Zhenyao, SUN Jiamei, YU Xinxiao, et al. Experiment study on effects of undergrowth litter of Quercus variabilis on runoff and sediment reduction[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(3):55.
|
[12] |
LI Xiang, NIU Jianzhi, XIE Baoyuan. The effect of leaf litter cover on surface runoff and soil erosion in northern China[J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9(9):e107789.
|
[13] |
BORGA M, STOFFEL M, MARCHI L, et al. Hydrogeomorphic response to extreme rainfall in headwater systems:Flash floods and debris flows[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 518(4):194.
|
[14] |
关丽, 陈品祥, 闫宁, 等. 基于GIS的北京市山区防洪灾害风险区划技术探讨[J]. 城市勘测, 2016(4):18. GUAN Li, CHEN Pinxiang, YAN Ning, et al. Risk zonation technology and example of Beijing mountain torrent based on GIS[J]. Urban Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2016(4):18.
|
[15] |
刘川佳仔. 北京小流域产流特点及暴雨洪水计算研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2013. LIU Chuanjiazai. Study on the runoff generation and flood calculation of Beijing small watershed[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2013.
|
[16] |
刘宝元, 段淑怀, 符素华, 等. 北京市"7·21"特大暴雨水土保持措施效益评价[J]. 北京水务, 2012(5):8. LIU Baoyuan, DUAN Shuhuai, FU Suhua, et al. Benefit evaluation of soil and water conservation measures for torrential rains on 21st July in Beijing city[J]. Beijing Water, 2012(5):8.
|
[17] |
贾剑波, 余新晓, 王贺年, 等. 暴雨条件下北京山区主要乔木蓄水能力研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(3):114. JIA Jianbo, YU Xinxiao, WANG Henian, et al. Water storage of main trees under storm conditions in Beijing mountain area[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(3):114.
|
[18] |
时忠杰, 王彦辉, 徐丽宏, 等. 六盘山主要森林类型枯落物的水文功能[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2009, 31(1):91. SHI Zhongjie, WANG Yanhui, XU Lihong, et al. Hydrological functions of litter layer of typical forest types in the Liupan mountains of Ningxia[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2009, 31(1):91.
|
[19] |
魏强, 凌雷, 张广忠, 等. 甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物累积量及持水特性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(10):2589. WEI Qiang, LING Lei, ZHANG Guangzhong, et al. Water-holding characteristics and accumulation amount of the litters under main forest types in Xinglong mountain of Gansu, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(10):2589.
|
[20] |
孙继松, 雷蕾, 于波, 等. 近10年北京地区极端暴雨事件的基本特征[J]. 气象学报, 2015, 73(4):609. SUN Jisong, LEI Lei, YU Bo, et al. The fundamental features of the extreme severe rain events in the recent 10 years in the Beijing area[J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2015, 73(4):609.
|
[21] |
孙达, 张妙仙, 韩瑾, 等. 野外人工模拟降水条件下荒草坡产流产沙试验[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2008,25(5):635. SUN Da, ZHANG Miaoxian, HAN Jin, et al. Sediment and yield runoff with simulated rainfall on a barren slope[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2008,25(5):635.
|
[22] |
何玉广, 信忠保, 余新晓, 等. 模拟降雨条件下侧柏林地枯落物对坡面产流产沙的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(3):27. HE Yuguang, XIN Zhongbao, YU Xinxiao, et al. Influence of litter layer of Platycladus orientalis forests on runoff and sediment yield of the slope under simulated rainfall[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(3):27.
|
[23] |
王利, 于立忠, 张金鑫, 等. 浑河上游水源地不同林型水源涵养功能分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(3):249. WANG Li, YU Lizhong, ZHANG Jinxin, et al. Analysis of water conservation functions of different forest types in the upper reaches of Hunhe River[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(3):249.
|
[24] |
马波, 由政, 吴发启, 等. 种植大豆条件下土壤结皮对坡耕地径流和侵蚀产沙的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(3):16. MA Bo, YOU Zheng, WU Faqi, et al. Effect of soil crust onslope runoff and sediment yield under soybean cover[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 13(3):16.
|
[25] |
孔亚平, 张科利, 唐克丽. 坡长对侵蚀产沙过程影响的模拟研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2001,15(2):17. KONG Yaping, ZHANG Keli, TANG Keli, et al. Impacts of slope length on soil erosion process under simulated rainfall[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001,15(2):17.
|
[26] |
陈俊杰, 孙莉英, 刘俊体, 等. 不同坡长与雨强条件下坡度对细沟侵蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(2):1. CHEN Junjie, SUN Liying, LIU Junti, et al. Effect of slope gradient on rill erosion under different rainfall intensities and slope lengths[J]. Bulletin of soil and water conservation, 2013, 33(2):1.
|
[27] |
陈洪松, 邵明安, 王克林. 土壤初始含水率对坡面降雨入渗及土壤水分再分布的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006,22(1):44. CHEN Hongsong, SHAO Ming'an, WANG Kelin. Effects of initial water content on hillslope rainfall infiltration and soil water redistribution[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2006,22(1):44.
|
[28] |
李义豪, 李传哲, 穆文彬, 等. 不同坡度和前期土壤含水率下裸地和草地的降雨产流试验分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(14):45. LI Yihao, LI Chuanzhe, MU Wenbin, et al. Analysis of bare soil and grassland rainfall-runoff experiment in different slope gradient and antecedent soil moisture content[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(14):45.
|
|
|
|