Abstract：[Background] Coal gangue is a solid waste generated in the process of coal production, which has low water-retaining capacity. A large amount of coal gangue accumulation may cause serious environmental pollutions. At present, the main way to treat gangue mountains is to directly cover soil and vegetation reconstruction; however, usually the mining area is short of soil and the site condition is extremely adverse. Therefore, it is necessary to add different proportion of coal gangue and water-retaining agent in soil to make rational use of coal gangue and improve its water-retaining property.[Methods] Yangchangwan dump site of Lingwu in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region was taken as the research object, and 3 types of gangue matrix were set up:the ratio of coal gangue to soil was 3:1(CGM1), 1:1(CGM2) and 1:3(CGM3). In addition, acrylamide-potassium acrylate crosspolymer type (CLP) and attapulgite composite acrylamide-acrylamide type (WT) water-retaining agent with ratios of 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.5% were added respectively. The porosity, water absorption, water-retaining capacity and infiltration of gangue matrix were determined by soil column simulation.[Results] 1) The porosity, water-holding capacity and cumulative infiltration of CGM2 and CGM3 were higher than those of CGM1. With the increasing of proportion of CLP and WT, the water absorption and water-holding capacity of these treatments showed an increasing trend. The addition of CLP promoted soil water infiltration, and with the increasing of the proportion, its promotion effect became more obvious. However, the addition of WT was inversely proportional to the cumulative infiltration of coal gangue matrix. In CGM2, the adding proportion of 0.5% CLP had the highest cumulative infiltration at 60 min, reaching 48.78 mL. 2) A multi-way ANOVA demonstrated that the type of coal gangue matrix was the main factor affecting the water-holding capacity of the matrix, and the type of water-retaining agent had the greatest influence on the cumulative infiltration of coal gangue matrix. 3) Cluster analysis was performed on 21 treatments, which were divided into 3 groups. Group Ⅲ only included treatment adding 0.5%CLP under CGM2, which had better water retention and infiltration characteristics than those of other treatments.[Conculsions] Adding water-retaining agent can improve the water retention performance of coal gangue matrix. The best water retention effect is obtained when 0.5% acrylamide-potassium acrylate crosspolymer added to the ratio of coal gangue to soil 1:1.
SUDING K N, HOBBS R J. Threshold models in restoration and conservation:A developing framework[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2009, 24(5):271.
[2]
辛未冬, 王宇欣. 霍州煤矸石山大型土壤动物群落特征研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019,33(1):158. XIN Weidong, WANG Yuxin. Study on characteristics of soil macrofauna communities in Huozhou coal waste pile[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2009, 33(1):158.
[3]
LEI K, PAN H Y, LIN C Y. A landscape approach towards ecological restoration and sustainable development of mining areas[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016(90):320.
[4]
程功林, 陈永春. 煤矸石山的危害及植被生态重建途径探讨[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2009, 37(4):54. CHENG Gonglin, CHEN Yongchun. The hazards of coal refuse piles and their ecological reconstruction[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2009, 37(4):54.
[5]
HUANG J, WANG P, XU C R, et al. Fly ash modified coalmine solid wastes for stabilization of trace metals in mining damaged land reclamation:A case study in Xuzhou coal mine area[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(10):2317.
[6]
BHARDWAJ A K, SHAINBERG I, GOLDSTEIN D, et al. Water retention and hydraulic conductivity of cross-linked polyacrylamides in sandy soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2007, 71(2):406.
[7]
OMIDIAN H J, ROCCA G, PARK K. Advances in superporous hydrogels[J]. Journal of Controlled Release,2005, 102(1):3.
[8]
侯贤清, 李荣, 何文寿, 等. 2种保水剂对旱作土壤物理性状及马铃薯产量的影响比较[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(12):2410. HOU Xianqing, LI Rong, HE Wenshou, et al. Comparative effects of two super absorbent on soil physical properties of dryland and potato yield[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 29(12):2410.
[9]
李晶晶, 白岗栓. 保水剂在水土保持中的应用及研究进展[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2012, 10(1):114. LI Jingjing, BAI Gangshuan. Application and development of water holding agents in soil and water conservation[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 10(1):114.
[10]
侯贤清, 李荣, 何文寿, 等. 保水剂对旱作马铃薯产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(5):1016. HOU Xianqing, LI Rong, HE Wenshou, et al. Effects of super absorbent on yield and water use efficiency of potato in dry land[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 32(5):1016.
[11]
宋双双, 孙保平, 张建锋. 保水剂和微生物菌肥对半干旱区造林和土壤改良的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(3):334. SONG Shuangshuang, SUN Baoping, ZHANG Jianfeng. Research on soil absorbent polymer and microbial fertilizer to improve semi-arid soil and afforestation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(3):334.
[12]
杨永辉, 武继承, 吴普特, 等. 秸秆覆盖与保水剂对土壤结构、蒸发及入渗过程的作用机制[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2009, 7(5):70. YANG Yonghui, WU Jicheng, WU Pute, et al. Effect mechanism of straw mulching and water-retaining agent on soil structure, evaporation, and infiltration process[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 7(5):70.
[13]
魏贤, 陈瑞环, 王萍, 等. 一种耐盐型保水剂对沙培玉米生长特性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(6):1422. WEI Xian, CHEN Ruihuan, WANG Ping, et al. Effect of a salt-tolerant type of water-retaining polymer on growth characteristics of maize in the sand[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2018, 55(6):1422.
[14]
赵陟峰, 王冬梅, 赵廷宁. 保水剂对煤矸石基质上高羊茅生长及营养吸收的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(16):5101. ZHAO Zhifeng, WANG Dongmei, ZHAO Tingning. The effect of super absorbent polymer on the growth and nutrition absorption of Festuca arundinacea L. on an improved gangue matrix[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013, 33(16):5101.
[15]
STOCK O, DOWNES N K. Effects of additions of organic matter on the penetration resistance of glacial till for the entire water tension range[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2008, 99(2):191.
[16]
吕刚, 王磊, 卢喜平, 等. 不同复垦方式排土场砾石对饱和导水率和贮水能力的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(6):1414. LÜ Gang, WANG Lei, LU Xiping, et al. The effect of gravel on saturated hydraulic conductivity and sater storage capacity in reclaimed dump relative to reclamation mode[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(6):1414.
[17]
刘目兴, 聂艳, 于婧. 不同初始含水率下粘质土壤的入渗过程[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(3):871. LIU Muxing, NIE Yan, YU Jing. The infiltration process of clay soil under different initial soil water contents[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(3):871.
[18]
温鹏飞, 李静, 何振嘉. 煤矸石在土地复垦中应用探究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2018, 37(12):43. WEN Pengfei, LI Jing, HE Zhenjia. Study on application of coal gangue in land reclamation[J]. Coal Technology, 2018, 37(12):43.
[19]
CHENG W, BIAN Z F, DONG J H, et al. Soil properties in reclaimed farmland by filling subsidence basin due to underground coal mining with mineral wastes in China[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2014, 24(8):2627.
[20]
CHEN M, CHEN X Y, HUANG H, et al. Effects of fly ash, silty clay loam and loamy sand on the hydraulic conductivity and air permeability of coal gangue[J]. Frsenius Environmental Bulletin, 2018, 27(4):2035.
[21]
马保国, 王健, 刘婧然, 等. 煤矸石基质土壤的水分入渗试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2014, 39(12):2501. MA Baoguo, WANG Jian, LIU Jingran, et al. Experimental study on water infiltration of soil weathering coal gangue[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(12):2501.
[22]
ZHOU B B, SHAO M A, WEN M X, et al. Effects of coal gangue content on water movement and solute transport in a China Loess Plateau soil[J]. Clean-Soil Air Water, 2010, 38(11):1031.
[23]
陈艺超, 孙保平, 张建锋, 等. 保水剂用量对矿区紫花苜蓿生长的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2018, 16(4):124. CHEN Yichao, SUN Baoping, ZHANG Jianfeng, et al. Effects of application rate of super absorbent polymers on the growth of Medicago sativa in mining area[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,16(4):124.
[24]
TANG Y B, YU L J, XU L, et al. Effects of combined application of water retaining agents and organic materials on water holding characteristics of yellow brown soils in hilly areas[J]. Agricultural Science Technology, 2015, 26(9):1985.
[25]
ZHONG S Q, WEI C F, LIU B, et al. Restoration technologies of damaged paddy in hilly post-mining and subsidence-stable area of Southwest China[J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2015, 8(2):46.
[26]
韩玉国, 武亨飞, 杨培岭, 等. 保水剂对土壤的物理性质与水分入渗的动态影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(5):161. HAN Yuguo, WU Hengfei, YANG Peiling, et al. Dynamic effects of super absorbent polymer on physical properties and water infiltration of soil[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(5):161.
[27]
冉艳玲, 王益权, 张润霞, 等. 保水剂对土壤持水特性的作用机理研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(5):101. RAN Yanling, WANG Yiquan, ZHANG Runxia, et al. Research on the mechanism of super absorbent polymer to soil water-holding characteristic[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2015, 33(5):101.
[28]
闫永利, 魏占民, 任秀苹, 等. 保水剂对土壤持水性影响及在不同土壤中效果比较[J]. 节水灌溉, 2016(1):34. YAN Yongli, WEI Zhanmin, REN Xiuping,et al. Influence of water retaining agent on soil water holding capacity and its effect comparison in different soils[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2016(1):34.
[29]
曹丽花, 赵世伟, 赵勇钢, 等. 土壤结构改良剂对风沙土水稳性团聚体改良效果及机理的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(2):65. CAO Lihua, ZHAO Shiwei, ZHAO Yonggang, et al. Study on improvements of modifiers on soil water stable aggregates and its mechanisms in aeolian sandy soil[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 21(2):65.
[30]
徐婉婷, 韩舒, 师庆东, 等. 不同保水剂在干旱环境下的基本性能对比研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2015(8):38. XU Wanting, HAN Shu, SHI Qingdong, et al. Comparative study on fundamental properties of different super absorbent polymers in arid environments[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2015(8):38.
2020, Vol. 18 
