Effects of different tending techniques on the soil erosion and water loss in young plantations
LI Hua1,2, ZHENG Lu1,2, WU Sida1, CHEN Lin1,2, LI Chaoying1, MING Angang1,2, MIN Huilin1,2, HAO Jian1
1. Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, 532600, Pingxiang, Guangxi, China; 2. Guangxi Youyiguan Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Youyiguan Forest Ecosystem Observation and Research Station of Guangxi, 532600, Pingxiang, Guangxi, China
Abstract：[Background] Soil erosion and water loss in the forest land after clear-cutting and control burning were serious, and it is the limiting factor of sustainable management of plantations. The young forest tending is one of the important measures of plantation management, which can promote the growth of young trees and accelerate the closure of young forest. Different tending techniques have different disturbance degrees to soil, can they effectively reduce soil and water loss in forest land? In this paper, the effects of different tending techniques on the soil erosion and water loss in young plantations after control burning were analyzed. [Methods] Two kinds of tending techniques (brush breaking tending and overall tending) were considered in a control burning site of 30-year-old Pinus massoniana plantation in southern Guangxi. Based on the fixed position observation of the 3 runoff plots of each tending techniques, the soil erosion and water loss were measured from 2018 to 2020. We compared the soil erosion and water loss, and analyzed the relationship between rainfall and runoff depth and sediment loss of the two different tending techniques. [Results] 1) In the first two years after control burning in which the soil erosion and water loss was serious occurred, the annual volume of runoff of brush breaking tending plots were 65.4% and 64.5% of overall tending plots, respectively. The annual amount of sediment loss of brush breaking tending plots were 46.9% and 37.2% of overall tending plots, respectively. In rainy months, the soil erosion and water loss were more obvious or significant lower in the brush breaking tending plots than in the overall tending plots (P＜0.05). In the third year after control burning, the brush breaking tending plots still significantly reduced the soil erosion and water loss in tending months and the whole year. 2) Brush breaking tending treatment increased the minimum rainfall for surface runoff. With the increase of daily rainfall amount, the soil erosion and water loss were significantly lower in the brush breaking tending plots than in the overall tending plots. [Conclusions] In the clear-cutting and control burning site of southern Guangxi, it is effective to prevent soil erosion and water loss by changing tending techniques.
李华, 郑路, 吴思达, 陈琳, 李朝英, 明安刚, 闵惠琳, 郝建. 不同抚育方式对人工幼林地水土流失的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2024, 22(6): 96-105.
LI Hua, ZHENG Lu, WU Sida, CHEN Lin, LI Chaoying, MING Angang, MIN Huilin, HAO Jian. Effects of different tending techniques on the soil erosion and water loss in young plantations. SSWC, 2024, 22(6): 96-105.
俞新妥, 杨玉盛, 何智英, 等. 炼山对杉木人工林生态系统的影响Ⅰ炼山初期林地水土流失的初步研究[J]. 福建林学院学报, 1989, 9(3): 238. YU Xintuo, YANG Yusheng, HE Zhiying, et al. Effect of control burning on the ecological system of Chinese fir plantation, ⅠA preliminary study on the soil erosion and water loss during the beginning of control burning [J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 1989, 9(3): 238.
[2]
马祥庆, 俞新妥, 何智英, 等. 不同林地清理方式对杉木幼林生态系统水土流失的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 1996, 11(1): 33. MA Xiangqing, YU Xintuo, HE Zhiying, et al. Effects of different forest ground clearances on the soil erosion of the ecosystem of young Chinese fir forest[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 1996, 11(1): 33.
[3]
杨尚东, 吴俊, 谭宏伟, 等. 红壤区桉树人工林炼山后土壤肥力变化及其生态评价[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(24): 7788. YANG Shangdong, WU Jun, TAN Hongwei, et al. Variation of soil fertility in Eucakyptus robusta plantations after control burning in the red soil region and its ecological evaluation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(24): 7788.
[4]
杨玉盛, 何宗明, 马祥庆, 等. 论炼山对杉木人工林生态系统影响的利弊及对策[J]. 自然资源学报, 1997, 12(2): 153. YANG Yusheng, HE Zongming, MA Xiangqing, et al. On the advantages and disadvantages of the effects of controlled burning on the ecological system of Chinese fir plantation and the countermeasures[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 1997, 12(2): 153.
[5]
FLINT L E, CHILDS S W. Effect of shading, mulching and vegetation control on Doulglas-fir seedling growth and soil water supply[J]. Forest Ecol Manage, 1987, 18: 189.
[6]
林开敏, 洪伟, 俞新妥, 等. 不同抚育技术对杉木幼林生长及群体结构的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2001, 37(6): 26. LIN Kaimin, HONG Wei, YU Xintuo, et al. The effect of tending methods on growth and population structure of young Chinese fir plantation[J]. Scientia Silve Sinicae, 2001, 37(6): 26.
[7]
张先仪, 盛伟彤, 邓宗付, 等. 杉木幼林不同抚育方法效果的评价[J]. 林业科学研究, 1994, 7(4): 394. ZHANG Xianyi, SHENG Weitong, DENG Zongfu, et al. Experiment on different tending method for juvenile Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata)[J]. Forest Research, 1994, 7(4): 394.
[8]
马祥庆, 刘爱琴, 俞立亘. 抚育方式对杉木人工林生态系统的影响[J]. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1999, 5(3): 11. MA Xiangqing, LIU Aiqin, YU Ligen. Effect of tending method on ecosystem of Chinese fir plantation[J]. Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation, 1999, 5(3): 11.
[9]
李华, 卢立华, 郑路, 等. 一种简易径流场: ZL201822258483.1[P].2018-12-29. LI Hua, LU Lihua, ZHENG Lu, et al. One kind of simple runoff plot: ZL201822258483.1[P]. 2018-12-29.
[10]
张青青, 陈志强, 陈志彪, 等. 南方典型红壤区不同水保措施下坡面产流产沙及稀土迁移特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(1) : 46. ZHANG Qingqing, CHEN Zhiqiang, CHEN Zhibiao, et al. Characteristics of slope runoff and sediment yield and REEs migrations under different soil and water conservation measures in a typical red soil region of southern China [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(1): 46.
[11]
1林草资源 全国森林资源情况[Z]. 中国林业和草原统计年鉴, 中国林业出版社, 2019, 2. ⅠForest and grass resources, state of national forest resources [Z]. China Forestry and Grassland Statistical yearbook, China Forestry Publishing House, 2019, 2.
[12]
2国土绿化 各地区造林和抚育情况[Z]. 中国林业和草原统计年鉴, 中国林业出版社, 2019, 12. ⅡLand greening, afforestation and tending in different regions[Z]. China Forestry and Grassland Statistical yearbook, China Forestry Publishing House, 2019, 12.
[13]
李勇, 徐晓琴, 朱显谟, 等. 植物根系与土壤抗冲性[J]. 水土保持学报, 1993, 7(3): 11. LI Yong, XU Xiaoqin, ZHU Xianmo, et al. Plant roots and soil anti-scourability[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1993, 7(3): 11.
[14]
王雅琼, 张建军, 李梁, 等. 祁连山区典型草地生态系统土壤抗冲性影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(1): 122. WANG Yaqiong, ZHANG Jianjun, LI Liang, et al. Analysis of factors impacting soil anti-scourability of typical grassland ecosystems on the Qilian Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(1): 122.
[15]
王库. 植物根系对土壤抗侵蚀能力的影响[J]. 土壤与环境, 2001, 10(3): 250. WANG Ku. Effect of plant roots on soil anti-erosion[J]. Soil and Environmental Sciences, 2001, 10(3): 250.
[16]
郭雨华, 赵廷宁, 孙保平, 等. 草地坡面水动力学特性及其阻延地表径流机制研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2006, 13(4): 264. GUO Yuhua, ZHAO Tingning, SUN Baoping, et al. Study on the dynamic characteristics of overland flow and resistance to overland flow of grass slope[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 13(4): 264.
[17]
周萍, 文安邦, 严冬春, 等. 三峡库区紫色土坡耕地草本植物根系固结地埂的土力学机制[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(1): 85. ZHOU Ping, WEN Anbang, YAN Dongchun, et al. The mechanics of soil reinforcement by root on the hedge of the sloping cultivated lands of purple soils in the three gorges reservoir region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(1): 85.
[18]
GYSSELS G, POESEN J. The importance of plant root characteristics in controlling concentrated flow erosion rates[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group, 2003, 28(4): 371.
[19]
GYSSELS G, POESEN J, BOCHET E, et al. Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: A review[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 2005, 29(2): 189.
[20]
张嘉懿, 汪军红, 程先富, 等. 降雨对江子河小流域不同农作物措施坡面产流产沙的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(2): 8. ZHANG Jiayi, WANG Junhong, CHENG Xianfu, et al. Effects of rainfall on slope runoff and sediment yield under different crop measures in the Jiangzi River minor watershed[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(2): 8.
[21]
吴洁玲, 查轩, 陈世发, 等. 1951—2018年韶关不同量级降雨侵蚀力变化[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(4): 21. WU Jieling, ZHA Xuan, CHEN Shifa, et al. Variations of rainfall erosivity of different magnitudes in Shaoguan from 1951 to 2018[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(4): 21.
[22]
韦中绵, 黄承标, 何诗雄, 等.桉树纯林和桉-珍混交林水土流失规律的分析[J].广西林业科学, 2016, 45(4): 404. WEI Zhongmian, HUANG Chengbiao, HE Shixiong, et al. Analysis on the regularities of soil and water erosion in Eucalyptus gradis pure plantation and Eucalyptus gradis-precious hardwood mixed plantation[J]. Guangxi Forestry Science, 2016, 45(4): 404.
2024, Vol. 22 
