Spatial patterns of forest ecosystem services in Liaoning province
XU Tingyu1,2,3, NIU Xiang1,2,3, WANG Bing1,2,3
1. Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, 100091, Beijing, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, 100091, Beijing, China; 3. Dagangshan National Key Field Observation and Research Station for Forest Ecosystem, 336606, Xinyu, Jiangxi, China
Abstract:[Background] Forests are the important component of terrestrial ecosystems and provide a variety of benefits for human. The assessment of forest ecosystem services has become a bridge linking human society and the natural environment.[Methods] Based on the forest resources data in Liaoning province in 2017, we used the national standard specifications of the People's Republic of China "Specifications for Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Service in China" (GB/T 38582-2020) with the distributed measurement method to assess the services of soil conservation, forest nutrition retention, water conservation, carbon fixation and oxygen release, purification of atmospheric environment, in the Liaoning province. Grey relational method was used to analyze the influencing factors.[Results] 1) The amount of soil conservation in the forest ecosystem of Liaoning province in 2017 was 24 846.82×104 t; a total of 2 198.03×104 t of fertilizers was preserved; the amount of forest nutrient retention was 59.00×104 t; water conservation was 208.20×108 m3; carbon fixation was 1 938.55×104 t; oxygen release was 4 440.79×104 t; the forest ecosystem provided 3.89×1025 negative ion and absorbed 79.32×104 t of gaseous pollutants, and retented 10 153.67×104 t TSP, the masses of retented PM10 and PM2.5 substances were 2 164.40×104 kg and 613.12×104 kg respectively. 2) The service function of forest ecosystem generally presented the distribution pattern of mountainous area in eastern Liaoning > Northwest area > The coastal area of central and southern. Dandong, Fushun and Benxi had higher services and made proportion of more than 40% services, while Shenyang, Jinzhou and Panjin have lower services. 3) The factor with the highest degree of correlation with ecosystem service was precipitation (0.779 7-0.819 9), and the correlation between climate factors and service functions was higher than policy factors and socio-economic factors.[Conculsions] This study can provide a scientific basis for scientifically carrying out forestry ecological projects in different regions of Liaoning Province, timely adjusting the direction of forestry development, and designing the path to realize the value of ecological products.
ONAINDIA M, DE MANUEL B F, MADARIAGA I, et al.Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2013(289):1.
[2]
赵同谦,欧阳志云,郑华,等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(4):480. ZHAO Tongqian, OUYANG Zhiyun, ZHENG Hua, et al. Forest ecosystems and their valuation in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2004, 19(4):480.
[3]
靳芳,鲁绍伟,余新晓,等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1531. JIN Fang, LU Shaowei, YU Xinxiao, et al. Forest ecosystem service and its evaluation in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(8):1531.
[4]
国家林业局. LY/T 1721-2008森林生态系统服务功能评估规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008. National Forestry Administration. LY/T 1721-2008 Specifications for assessment of forest ecosystem services[S]. Beijing:National Standard Press,2008.
[5]
"中国森林资源核算研究"项目组. 生态文明制度构建中的中国森林资源核算研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2015:155. "China Forest Resources Accounting Research" Project Team. China's forest resources accounting in the context of ecocivilization institutional development[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Press,2015:155.
[6]
崔亚琴,樊兰英,刘随存,等.山西省森林生态系统服务功能评估[J].生态学报,2019,39(13):4732. CUI Yaqin, FAN Lanying, LIU Suicun,et al.Evaluation of forest ecosystem services value in Shanxi province[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(13):4732.
[7]
韩玉杰,孙文,张文文.基于分布式测算方法的上海城市森林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019(2):147. HAN Yujie, SUN Wen, ZHANG Wenwen. Evaluation of ecosystem services for urban forests in Shanghai based on a distribution measurement methodology[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science),2019(2):147.
[8]
黄龙生,王兵,牛香,等.济南市森林生态系统服务功能空间格局研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(17):6477. HUANG Longsheng, WANG Bing, NIU Xiang, et al.Spatial pattern of the ecosystem service function of forests in Jinan City[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(17):6477.
[9]
宋庆丰,王兵,牛香. 吉林省森林生态系统涵养水源功能时空变化特征[J].北华大学学报(自然科学版),2019,20(4):524. SONG Qingfeng, WANG Bing, NIU Xiang. Temporal and spatial patterns of water conservation function of forest ecosystem in Jilin province[J]. Journal of Beihua University (Natural Science),2019,20(4):524.
[10]
刘胜涛,牛香,王兵,等.宁夏贺兰山自然保护区森林生态系统净化大气环境功能[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(2):420. LIU Shengtao, NIU Xiang, WANG Bing, et al.Air purification function of forest ecosystem in Helanshan Nature Reserve of Ningxia[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38(2):420.
[11]
王兵,鲁绍伟,尤文忠,等. 辽宁省森林生态系统服务评估[J]. 应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1792. WANG Bing, LU Shaowei, YOU Wenzhong, et al. Evaluation of forest ecosystem services value in Liaoning province[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(7):1792.
[12]
刘润,王兵,牛香,等. 2006-2014辽宁省森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 温带林业研究,2019,2(2):1. LIU Run, WANG Bing, NIU Xiang, et al. Value assessment of forest ecosystem service in Liaoning province from 2006-2014[J]. Journal of Temperate Forestry Research, 2019,2(2):1.
[13]
国家林业和草原局.GB/T 38582-2020森林生态系统服务功能评估规范[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2020. National Forestry and Grassland Administration. GB/T 38582-2020 Specifications for assessment of forest ecosystem services[S]. Beijing:National Standard Press,2020.
[14]
辽宁省统计局. 辽宁统计年鉴:2018[EB/OL]. (2019-02-27)[2020-12-25]. http://tjj.ln.gov.cn/tjsj/sjcx/ndsj/otherpages/2018/zk/indexch.htm. Bureau of Statistics of the Liaoning Province. Liaoning statistical yearbook:2018[EB/OL]. (2019-02-27)[2020-12-25]. http://tjj.ln.gov.cn/tjsj/sjcx/ndsj/otherpages/2018/zk/indexch.htm.
[15]
宋庆丰,王雪松,王晓燕,等.基于生物量的森林生态功能修正系数的应用——以辽宁省退耕还林工程为例[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(3):111. SONG Qingfeng, WANG Xuesong, WANG Xiaoyan, et al. Application of forest ecological function correction coefficient based on biomass:A case study of conversion of cropland to forest in Liaoning province[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015,13(3):111.
[16]
WANG Jinzheng, WANG Peng, YUE Fengnian. Response of ecosystem services value based on land use changes and analysis of its driving factors in hilly region with red soil.[J].Agricultural Science & Technology,2010,11(Z2):150-154.
[17]
曹忠杰,蔡景平,何建明,等. 辽宁省第四次土壤侵蚀遥感普查结果分析[J]. 水土保持应用技术,2007(5):21. CAO Zhongjie, CAI Jingping, HE Jianming, et al. Analysis on the results of the fourth remote sensing survey of soil erosion in Liaoning province[J]. Technology of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007(5):21.
[18]
辽宁省生态环境厅. 2017年辽宁省环境状况公报[EB/OL]. (2018-06-04)[2020-12-25]. http://sthj.ln.gov.cn/hjzl/hjzkgb/hjzlzkgb/201806/t20180604_3674175.html,2018. Department of Ecology and Environment of Liaoning Province. Bulletin of the environmental status of Liaoning Province in 2017[EB/OL].(2018-06-04)[2020-12-25]. http://sthj.ln.gov.cn/hjzl/hjzkgb/hjzlzkgb/201806/t20180604_3674175.html.,2018.
[19]
PAN Y, XU Z, WU J. Spatial differences of the supply of multiple ecosystem services and the environment and land use factors affecting them[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013(5):4.
[20]
中共辽宁省委,辽宁省人民政府. 关于贯彻《中共中央、国务院关于加快林业发展的决定》的实施意见[Z]. 2004. The Liaoning Provincial Committee of the Communist Party of China, the People's Government of Liaoning Province. Implementation opinions on the implementation of the "Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on accelerating forestry development"[Z]. 2004.