Journal
Objective To measure the expression levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 in the tumor tissues of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and to explore the association of their expression with the clinical characteristics and prognosis of NPC patients. Methods The expression levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 in 65 NPC patients were determined by immunohistochemistry, and an analysis was performed on the association of their expression with clinical characteristics and long-term survival in NPC patients. Comparisons between groups were made by the chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test, and the Pearson’s test was used for correlation analysis. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used for survival comparison and univariate prognostic analysis. The Cox model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis. Results Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was observed in 88%(57/65) and 89%(58/65) of tumor cell surfaces using a cut-off value of 5%, and 38%(25/65) and 58%(38/65) using a cut-off value of 10%. PD-1 expression was significantly correlated with PD-L1 expression using the cut-off value of 5%(P=0.003), and a non-significant correlation was found between the expression levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 using the cut-off value of 10%(P=0.080). There was no significant association between the positive expression rates of PD-1 and PD-L1 and clinicopathological characteristics (P>0.05). The univariate and multivariate survival analyses showed that using the cut-off value of 10%, the patients with positive PD-L1 expression had significantly reduced progression-free survival (hazard ratio[HR]=2.73, 95% confidence interval[CI]:1.07-6.97, P=0.035) and overall survival (HR=3.95, 95%CI:1.09-14.27, P=0.036) compared with those with negative PD-L1 expression. Conclusions PD-1 and PD-L1 are highly expressed in NPC tissues. The expression of PD-L1 is associated with the poor prognosis in patients with stage IVa NPC, and PD-L1 can better predict the poor prognosis using the cut-off value of 10%.
Objective To investigate the value of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T3N0 breast cancer (BC) who were treated with modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of BC patients treated with MRM from 1997 to 2014.The inclusion criteria were as follows:(1) female patients;(2) pathological diagnosis of invasive BC;(3) tumor volume greater than 5 cm without axillary lymph node metastasis;(4) the patients who received no neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy and had no distant metastasis or other second primary cancers. A total of 78 patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty patients (51%) received PMRT and sixty-seven patients (86%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS)(DFS), and local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates, and survival differences between groups were analyzed by the log-rank test. Results The median follow-up time was 79 months (6-232 months). For all patients, the 5-year OS, DFS, and LRR rates were 89%, 87%, and 2%, respectively. The 5-year DFS, OS and LRR rates for radiotherapy group were 84%, 84% and 0%, respectively, versus 91%(P=0.641), 96%(P=0.126), and 5% for non-radiotherapy group. Only estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status and molecular type had significant impacts on DFS (P=0.002 and 0.031, respectively). One patient in non-radiotherapy group had chest wall recurrence. Conclusions MRM is effective in reducing LRR in T3N0M0 BC patients. Only ER/PR status and molecular type significantly influence DFS. Effective systemic therapy may be helpful for some T3N0 patients to avoid chest wall and supraclavicular radiotherapy after MRM, but large-sample studies are needed to further confirm this conclusion.
Objective To investigate the plan quality between two treatment planning systems (TPSs) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods VMAT plans based on Varian Eclipse and Philips Pinnacle TPS were designed for 10 cervical cancer patients (2, 3 Arcs) and 10 prostate cancer patients (1, 2 Arcs). The delivery system of VMAT was Varian ClinaciX machine, and RapidArc was used. The treatment plan quality between the two TPSs was evaluated based on dose distribution, delivery efficiency, and parameter settings. The differences between the two TPSs were compared using paired t-test. Results For cervical cancer patients, the 2-Arc VMAT plans based on the Pinnacle was slightly better than those based on the Eclipse in terms of the conformal index (CI) of planning target volume (PTV), rectum V30 and V40, and bladder V30 and V40, and the homogeneity index (HI) of PTV and PTV1 as well as CI of PTV1 in theEclips were slightly better than those in the Pinnacle(P<0.05)Pinnacle were slightly worse than those in the Eclipse (P>0.05). The number of monitor units with 2-Arcs and 3-Arcs plans of the Eclipse was significantly smaller than those in the Pinnacle (P<0.05). For prostate cancer patients, The 1-arc VMAT plans of the Pinnacle TPS were slightly superior to those of the Eclipse TPS in terms of the HI of PTV, rectumV30 and V40, and bladderV30 and V40, but the former was slight inferior to the latter in terms of the CI of PTV (P<0.05). The number of monitor units of 1-arc and 2-Arcs plans showed no significant difference between the two TPSs (P>0.05). Conclusions For patients with cervical cancer and prostate cancer, the VMAT plans based on Varian Eclipse and Philips Pinnacle TPS can achieve a clinically acceptable dose distribution and show a little difference in the treatment plan quality. However, we will still need more cases to further study and determine the performance characteristics of the commercial TPSs for optimizing VMAT.
News
Cooperation unit