AbstractObjective To compare the differences in setup error (SE) assessment and correction between three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (3DCBCT) and four-dimensional CBCT(4DCBCT) in breast irradiation patients during free breathing after breast-conserving surgery. Methods Twenty patients with breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery were recruited for external beam breast irradiation and 4DCBCT and 3DCBCT simulation. The target volumes were delineated. Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were designed using the MONACO v5.10 treatment planning system. 3DCBCT and 4DCBCT images were collected alternately five times each before breast irradiation. The CT images were matched, and the interfraction SEs were acquired. After online setup correction, the residual errors were calculated, and the SEs, systematic errors, and random errors were compared. The paired t test was used for comparison between groups. Results The SEs acquired by 4DCBCT were significantly larger than those acquired by 3DCBCT in three directions (P=0.035,0.018,0.040). After online setup correction, the random errors based on 3DCBCT were significantly smaller than those based on 4DCBCT in left-right and anterior-posterior (AP) directions (0.5±0.39 mm vs. 0.7±0.30 mm, P=0.005;0.9±1.09 mm vs. 1.2±0.48 mm, P=0.000), and the residual errors based on 3DCBCT were also significantly smaller than those based on 4DCBCT in AP direction (0.2±0.33 mm vs. 0.6±0.63 mm, P=0.000). The setup margins based on 4DCBCT was significantly larger than those based on 3DCBCT in AP direction both before and after online setup correction (P=0.002). Conclusions Compared with 3DCBCT, 4DCBCT has more advantages in monitoring the SEs in three directions. Both 3DCBCT and 4DCBCT have similar efficacy in random error correction. The satisfying position repeatability and minimized target volume margins will be achieved by online setup correction.
Ding Yun,Li Yufeng,Li Qilin et al. Comparison of 3DCBCT and 4DCBCT matching results in setup error assessment and correction for breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2017, 26(10): 1173-1176.
Ding Yun,Li Yufeng,Li Qilin et al. Comparison of 3DCBCT and 4DCBCT matching results in setup error assessment and correction for breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2017, 26(10): 1173-1176.
[1] 丁昀,王玮,李建彬.早期乳腺癌保乳术后部分乳腺外照射靶区的确定[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2013,35(12):881-885.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2013.12.001. [2] 王玮,李建彬,胡宏光,等.自由呼吸状态下X线平片和CBCT在EB-PBI摆位误差测定与校正的比较研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2014,23(2):147-150.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2014.02.017. Wang W,Li JB,Hu HG,et al. Comparison of orthogonal kilovolt X-ray images and cone-beam CT matching results in setup error assessment and correction for EB-PBI during free breathing[J].Chin J Radiat Oncol,2014,23(2):147-150.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2014.02.017. [3] 王玮,李建彬,徐敏,等.锥形束CT引导全乳调强放疗摆位误差自适应的预测与校正[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2016,38(3):197-201.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2016.03.007. Wang W,Li JB,Xu M,et al. Cone beam CT-derived adaptive radiotherapy for setup error assessment and correction in whole breast intensity modulated radiotherapy[J].2016,38(3):197-201.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2016.03.007. [4] van Herk M,Remeijer P,Rasch C,et alThe probability of correct target dosage:dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,47(4):1121-1135.DOI:10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00518-6. [5] Mészáros N,Major T,Stelczer G,et al. Implementation of image-guided intensity-modulated accelerated partial breast irradiation:three-year results of a phase Ⅱ clinical study[J].Strahlenther Onkol,2017,193(1):70-79.DOI:10.1007/s00066-016-1074-9. [6] Yang Y,Schreibmann E,Li TF,et al. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation[J].Phys Med Biol,2007,52(3):685-705.DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/52/3/011. [7] Sweeney RA,Seubert B,Stark S,et al. Accuracy and inter-observer variability of 3D versus 4D cone-beam CT based image-guidance in SBRT for lung tumors[J].Radiat Oncol,2012,7(1):81.DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-7-81. [8] Chopra S,Dinshaw KA,kamble R,et al. Breast movement during normal and deep breathing,respiratory training and set up errors:implications for external beam partial breast irradiation[J].Br J Radiol,2006,79(945):766-773.DOI:10.1259/bjr/98024704. [9] Hurkmans CW,Remeijer P,Lebesque JV,et al. Set-up verification using portal imaging;review of current clinical practice[J].Radiother Oncol,2001,58(2):105-120.DOI:10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00260-7. [10] Grills IS,Hugo G,Kestin LL,et al. Image-guided radiotherapy via daily online cone-beam CT substantially reduces margin requirements for stereotactic lung radiotherapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2008,70(4):1045-1056.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2352. [11] Takahashi W,Yamashita H,Kida S,et al. Verification of planning target volume settings in volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiation therapy by using in-treatment 4-dimensional cone beam computed tomography[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2013,86(3):426-431.DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.02.019.
2017, Vol. 26 
