情报科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 69-76.

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

指标体系学术评价方法质量控制体系建构研究

  

  • 出版日期:2025-03-05 发布日期:2025-05-27

  • Online:2025-03-05 Published:2025-05-27

摘要: 【目的/意义】指标体系学术评价方法应用较广,其质量控制体系建构具有重要意义。【方法/过程】本文基于 元评价理论建立了指标体系学术评价质量控制的分析框架,在此基础上从评价理论、评价方法与技术、宏观环境与 监管、利益相关者、评价过程等角度分析了评价质量问题的产生机制,并建立指标体系学术评价质量控制体系框 架,提出了保障学术评价质量的应对策略。【结果/结论】指标体系学术评价质量问题的控制点是多元的;指标体系 学术评价质量的外部影响因素非常复杂;元评价理论与基础研究是保障评价质量的两个重要因素;政府、评价机构 是指标体系学术评价的质量保障单位。【创新/局限】本文的创新主要在于选题提出了一个新的领域,但由于指标体 系评价方法众多,对于个性化的评价方法质量控制问题有待逐步进行研究。

Abstract: 【Purpose/significance】The academic evaluation method of indicator system is widely used, and the construction of its qual⁃ ity control system is of great significance.【Method/process】This article establishes an analytical framework for quality control of multi-attribute academic evaluation based on meta evaluation theory. Based on this, the mechanism of evaluation quality issues is ana⁃ lyzed from the perspectives of evaluation theory, evaluation methods and techniques, macro environment and regulation, stakeholders, and evaluation process. A framework for quality control of multi-attribute academic evaluation is established, and corresponding strat⁃ egies to ensure the quality of academic evaluation are proposed.【Result/conclusion】Evaluation quality can be controlled from many aspects; the external influencing factors of the quality of multi-attribute academic evaluation are very complex; meta-evaluation theory and basic research are two important factors to ensure the quality of evaluation; the government and evaluation institutions are the qual⁃ ity assurance units for multi-attribute academic evaluation.【Innovation/limitation】The innovation of this article mainly lies in the topic proposal of a new field. Due to the numerous evaluation methods in the indicator system, the issue of quality control for personal⁃ ized evaluation methods needs to be gradually studied.