国内外个人数字遗产保存研究综述

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2022.06.008

档案学研究

2022, Vol. 36

Issue (6): 55-62 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2022.06.008

档案资源建设

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

国内外个人数字遗产保存研究综述

崔旭¹,张若为¹,康璨琛²

1 西北大学公共管理学院西安 710127
2 西北大学文学院西安 710127

A Review of Research on Personal Digital Heritage Preservation at Home and Abroad

Xu CUI¹,Ruowei ZHANG¹,Canchen KANG²

1 School of Public Administration, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127
2 Faculty of Liberal Arts, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127

全文:

HTML

PDF(1233 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要:

本文结合定量与定性分析方法，对国内外个人数字遗产保存研究从研究现状、研究主题、研究结论三维度进行分析，发现个人数字遗产保存研究处于发展阶段，具有以下特征：多学科参与，核心作者凸显，以定性方法为主，研究集中在概念价值、建议策略、隐私关切和技术系统上。研究尚存在不足，未来需要以用户需求为起点，兼顾理论和应用研究，开展跨学科研究，关注信息弱势群体，深化研究内容。

Abstract：

Combining quantitative and qualitative analysis methods, the research on personal digital heritage preservation at home and abroad is analyzed from the three dimensions of research status, research topics and research conclusions. It is found that the research on personal digital heritage preservation is in a developmental stage with the following characteristics: multidisciplinary participation, prominent core authors, predominantly qualitative methods, and research focused on conceptual values, suggested strategies, privacy concerns and technical systems. There are still some deficiencies in the research. In the future, it is necessary to start from user's needs, take into account both theoretical and applied research, carry out interdisciplinary research, pay attention to information disadvantaged groups, and deepen the research content.

出版日期: 2023-12-30

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

崔旭,张若为,康璨琛. 国内外个人数字遗产保存研究综述[J]. 档案学研究, 2022, 36(6): 55-62.
Xu CUI,Ruowei ZHANG,Canchen KANG. A Review of Research on Personal Digital Heritage Preservation at Home and Abroad. Archives Science Study, 2022, 36(6): 55-62.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2022.06.008 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2022/V36/I6/55

[1]	蒋银, 吴倩. 个人数字遗产的概念、管理与对策[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014(8):10-17.
[2]	Webster J, Waston R T. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future:writing a literature review[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2002(2):13-23.
[3]	Cushing A L. ''It's stuff that speaks to me'':exploring the characteristics of digital possessions[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013(8):1723-1734.
[4]	Gulotta R, Odom W, Faste H, et al. Legacy in the age of the internet:reflections on how interactive systems shape how we are remembered[C]// Wakkary R,Harrison S. Proceedings of the 2014 Conferenceon Designin Interactive Systems. New York: ACM, 2014:975-984.
[5]	吴丹, 樊舒, 李秀园. 中国情境下图书馆学研究方法的识别、分类及应用[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2021(5):33-47.
[6]	UNESCO. Charter for preserving digital heritage[EB/OL]. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/charter-preservation-digital-heritage.
[7]	Cushing A L. A balance of primary and secondary values: exploring a digital legacy[J]. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development& Technology, 2013(2):67-94.
[8]	王国强, 耿伟杰. 我国数字遗产继承现状研究[J]. 情报科学, 2012(1):44-48.
[9]	[12][22] 周美玲. 网络数字遗产保存:档案部门的责任与使命[J]. 云南档案, 2015(5):39-42.
[10]	[19] Stokes P. Deletion as second death:the moral status of digital remains[J]. Ethics and Information Technology, 2015(4):237-248.
[11]	Oliveira J. Luto digital:Plataformas para a gestão da herança digital[D]. Braga: Universidade do Minho, 2015:2.
[13]	Dissanayake D N, Cook D M. Social computing and older adults:challenges with data loss and digital legacies[C]// O'Conner L. 2019 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW). Danvers:IEEE, 2019:171-174.
[14]	[21] 冯占江. 互联网视阈下的数字遗产保护—“一个档案工作者应是首先想到未来的人”[J]. 档案学研究, 2013(4):81-85.
[15]	Japzon A, Agosto D E. Exploration of the motivation for and knowledge of preservation practices for personal digital artifacts[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007(1):1-4.
[16]	[49] Nagy A, Kiszl P. Personal digital legacy preservation by libraries[J]. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2021(3):382-397.
[17]	高嘉遥, 蒋璐璐. 联结、交互和展演:数字遗产的媒介化生存[J]. 当代传播, 2021(5):109-112.
[18]	[33][36] 顾理平, 范海潮. 作为“数字遗产”的隐私:网络空间中逝者隐私保护的观念建构与理论想象[J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2021(4):140-146.
[20]	张杰. 数字遗产继承障碍的法学辨析[J]. 山西档案, 2014(5):87-90.
[23]	Peoples C, Hetherington M. The cloud afterlife:managing your digital legacy[C]// Brandiff C, KetraA S, ZachP, et al. 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society. Danvers:IEEE, 2015:1-7.
[24]	Reid D. Factors that may prevent meaningful digital legacy[C]// Seneviratne O, SinghV, FreireA, et al. 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021. New York: ACM, 2021:141-142.
[25]	Chen J X, Vitale F, Mcgrenere J. What happens after death? using a design workbook to understand user expectations for preparing their data[C]// Kitamura Y,Quigley A. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 2021:1-13.
[26]	Pfister J. ''This will cause a lot of work.'' coping with transferring files and passwords as part of a personal digital legacy[C]// Bjørn P,Drucker S. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. New York: ACM, 2017:1123-1138.
[27]	Shavit V R, Tzezana R. Online legacies:online service providers and the public-a clear gap[J]. Finnish Death Studies Association, 2014(1):94-110.
[28]	Acker A, Kriesberg A. Tweets may be archived:civic engagement,digital preservation and obama white house social media data[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017(1):1-9.
[29]	Chew M M. Virtual property in China:the emergence of gamer rights awarenessand the reaction of game corporations[J]. New Media & Society, 2011(5):722-738.
[30]	[46] Pereira F H, Tempesta F, Pimentel C, et al. Exploring young adults' understanding and experience with a digital legacy management system[J]. Journal on Interactive Systems, 2019(2):50-69.
[31]	[35] Harbinja E. Post-mortem privacy 2.0:theory,law,and technology[J]. International Review of Law,Computers & Technology, 2017(1):26-42.
[32]	Buitelaar J C. Post-mortem privacy and informational self-determination[J]. ethics and information technology, 2017(2):129-142.
[34]	Beppu F R, Maciel C, Viterbo J. Contributions of the Brazilian act for the protection of personal data for treating digital legacy[J]. Journalon Interactive Systems, 2021(1):112-124.
[37]	Locasto M E, Massimi M, Depasquale P J. Security and privacy considerations in digital death[C]// Peisert S, Ford R. Proceedings of the 2011 New Security Paradigms Workshop. New York: ACM, 2011:1-10.
[38]	Bahri L, Carminati B, Ferrari E. What happens to my online social estate when I am gone? an integrated approach to posthumous online data management[C]// Rubin S,Chen S. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration. Danvers:IEEE, 2015:31-38.
[39]	Prates R O, Rosson M B, Souza C S. Making decisions about digital legacy with Google's inactive account manager[C]// Abascal J, BarbosaS, FetterM, et al. IFIP Conference on Human-computer Interaction. Cham:Springer, 2015: 201-209.
[40]	[50] Maciel C, Pereira V C, Sztern M. Internet users' legal and technical perspectives on digital legacy management for post-mortem interaction[C]// Yamamoto S. International Conference on Human Interface and the Management of Information. Cham Springer, 2015:627-639.
[41]	Guzman E G. Digital Demise:Preservation of Facebook legacies post mortem[D]. Austin:The University of Texas at Austin, 2017:1-56.
[42]	Gach K Z, Brubaker J R. Getting your Facebook affairs in order:user expectations in post-mortem profile management[C]// Nichols J. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. New York: ACM, 2021:1-29.
[43]	Brubaker J R, Callison-Burch V. Legacy contact:designing and implementing post-mortem stewardship at Facebook[C]// Kaye J,Druin A. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 2016:2908-2919.
[44]	马梦婕, 杨佳妮. 国内外互联网平台的数字遗产保护与管理策略研究[J]. 新媒体研究, 2021(23):55-58.
[45]	Lopes A D, Maciel C, Pereira V C. Virtual homage to the dead:an analysis of digital memorials in the social web[C]//Meiselwitz G. International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media. Cham:Springer, 2014:67-78.
[47]	Cardoso G A, Maciel C, Viterbo J. Uma análise exploratória de funcionalidades de sistemas dedicados de gerenciamento de legado digital[C]// Boscarioli C,Santoro F M. Anais do II Workshop Sobre as Implicações da Computa ção na Sociedade. Porto Alegre: SBC, 2021:112-121.
[48]	Ueda G, Maciel C. Analysis and convergence of studies on recommendations for digital memorials[C]// Monteiro I T, DaKamila R H, DeTicianne G R, et al. Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 2021:1-11.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed