The Review of The Relationship Between Post-custodial Theory and Records Continuum
ZHANG Yan1, 2, HUANG Qingchen1, 2
1. Department of Library, Information and Archives, Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444; 2. Institute for Cross-Straits Archives and Documents, Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444
Abstract: At present,there are still differences in academic circles on the relationship between the post-custodial theory and records continuum. Clarifying the relationship between the two is of great significance to the development and trend of the basic theory of archival science in the era of electronic documents. This paper uses comparative research method to analyze the similarities between the two in four aspects ideological background,practical background, social background and theoretical focus,and then analyzes the differences between the two in concept level and application scope,so as to re-examine the relationship between post-custodial theory and records continuum,and propose that records continuum is the enrichment and perfection of the content of post-custodial theory.
ZHANG Yan, HUANG Qingchen. The Review of The Relationship Between Post-custodial Theory and Records Continuum. Archives Science Study, 2020, 34(1): 25-31.
[1] 安小米. 文件连续体模式对电子文件最优化管理的启示[J]. 档案学通讯,2002(3):52-55. [2] 傅荣校,周林女. 电子文件管理中的热点理论问题研究类举[J].上海档案,2002(6):24-27. [3] 冯惠玲. 电子文件时代新思维《拥有新记忆——电子文件管理研究》摘要之六[J].档案学通讯,1998(6):46-50. [4] 何玉颜. 社会记忆视域下文件连续体理论的生命力[J].档案学通讯,2019(1):29-33. [5] 加小双. 后保管模式的背景、体系与意义[J].浙江档案,2015(7):19-21. [6] 何嘉荪,傅荣校.文件运动规律研究:从新角度审视档案学基础理论[M]. 北京:中国档案出版社. 1999:1. [7] 傅荣校,靳颖. 文件整体运动描述:是文件生命周期模式,还是用文件连续体模式?——后保管时代档案学基础理论适应性问题研究之三[J].档案管理,2008(3):7-12. [8] Mckemmish S. Yesterday, today and tomorrow: a continuum of responsibility[EB/OL].[2019-06-03].http://staging-infotech.monash.edu.au/research/groups/rcrg/publications/recordscontinuum-smckp2.html. [9] [39] 连志英. 一种新范式:文件连续体理论的发展及应用[J]. 档案学研究,2018(1):14-21. [10] 迪莉娅. 从后现代主义看文件连续体理论与后保管模式——电子环境下西方档案学理论发展的新思维观[J]. 山西档案,2003(2):12-13. [11] 徐拥军. 档案记忆观的理论基础[J].档案学研究,2017(6):4-12. [12] [27] 特里·库克.电子文件与纸质文件观念:后保管及后现代主义社会里信息与档案管理中面临的一场革命[J]. 刘越男,译.山西档案,1997(2):7-13. [13] [40] Upward F. Structuring the Records Continuum part one:Postcustodial Principles and Properties0] Upward F. Structuring the Records Continuum part one:Postcustodial Principles and Properties[J].Archives and Manuscripts,1996,24(2):268-285. [14] Cook T.Archival science and postmodernism:new formulations for old concepts[J]. Archival Science. 2001,01(1):3-24. [16] 特里·库克.1898年荷兰手册出版以来档案理论与实践的相互影响:第十三届国际档案大会文件报告集[G].北京:中国档案出版社,1997:162-163. [17] 傅荣校,王相华. 源于两种不同认识基础的理论——文件生命周期理论与文件连续体理论比较研究之一[J].档案学通讯,2004(3):19-22. [21] Upward F.Structuring the Records Continuum part Two:Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping[J].Archives and Manuscripts,1997,25(1):10-35. [22] 特里·库克. 1898年荷兰手册出版以来档案理论与实践的相互影响:第十三届国际档案大会文件报告集[G].北京:中国档案出版社,1997:147. [23] T·库克.铭记未来——档案在建构社会记忆中的作用[J].李音,译.档案学通讯,2002(2):74-78. [24] O’Shea G. Keeping electronic records issues and strategies[EB/OL].[2019-05-12].http://www.netpac.com/provenance/vol1/no2/features/erecs1a.htm [28] Cook T.Evidence,memory,identity,and community:four shifting archival paradigms[J].Archival Science.2013,13(2-3):95-120. [29] 特里·库克. 1898年荷兰手册出版以来档案理论与实践的相互影响:第十三届国际档案大会文件报告集[G].北京:中国档案出版社,1997:163. [30] Maclean L.Australian Experience in Record and Archives Management[J].The American Archivist.1959,22(4):387-418. [31] 徐拥军,周艳华,李刚. 基于知识服务的档案管理模式的理论探索[J].档案学通讯,2011(2):24-28. [32] 特里·库克. 对数字时代来源原则的反思[J].李音,译. 档案学研究,2011(1):82-85. [33] Cook T.Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins,Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada,1950-2000[J].Archival Science.2005,05(2):101-161. [38] Upward F.Modelling the Continuum as Paradigm Shift in Recordkeeping and Archiving Processes,and Beyond A Personal Reflection[J]. Records Management Journal,2000,10(3):115-139. [41] 特里·库克. 1898年荷兰手册出版以来档案理论与实践的相互影响:第十三届国际档案大会文件报告集[G].北京:中国档案出版社,1997:158. [42] 冯惠玲,加小双. 档案后保管理论的演进与核心思想[J].档案学通讯,2019(4):4-12.
