法律法规中档案及其属概念界定方法探讨

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.06.006

档案学研究

2018, Vol. 32

Issue (6): 35-39 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.06.006

档案法规标准

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

法律法规中档案及其属概念界定方法探讨

陈忠海¹, 刘东斌²

1 郑州大学信息管理学院郑州 450001
2 濮阳市档案局濮阳 4750004

Discussion on the definition method of Archives and its generic concept in laws and regulations

Zhonghai CHEN¹, Dongbin LIU²

1 School of Information Management,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,450001
2 The municipal archives administration of Puyang,Puyang,4750004

全文:

HTML

PDF(1006 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要:

梳理法律法规中档案及文件、记录、数据等属概念界定的方法,认为现行《档案法》《档案法实施办法》中的档案与档案属概念及其具体所指事物之间的范围并不契合,而《〈中华人民共和国档案法〉修订草案（送审稿）》界定档案的方法较好地解决了这一问题。事实证明,法律法规中运用举例型档案概念界定方法比运用定义式档案概念界定方法更为符合立法技术规范和社会现实需要。同时,不应要求其他法律法规中的档案概念与《档案法》中的档案概念完全相同,而应采取归纳、提炼和概括的方法,使其更加符合规范对象的实际,从而不断丰富档案法律体系中档案概念的内涵。

Abstract：

Combing the definition methods of the archives, documents, records, data and other generic concept of archives in the laws and regulations. It is considered that the concept of archives and its generic concept in the present“Archives Law”and the“Measures for the implementation of the Archives Law”are not in accord with the scope of specific things they refer to. However the method of defining archives in the“Revised draft of the Archives Law of the people’s Republic of China (submitted for review) ”has solved this problem well. It has been proved that the method of defining the concept of illustrative archives in laws and regulations is more in line with the legislative technical specifications and social reality needs than the method of defining the concept of the definition of archives. At the same time, the concept of archives in other laws and regulations should not be exactly the same as the concept of archives in the Archives Law, but should adopt the method of induction, extraction and generalization to make it more in line with the reality of the normative object. In order to enrich the concept of archives in the legal system.

出版日期: 2019-01-09

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

陈忠海, 刘东斌. 法律法规中档案及其属概念界定方法探讨[J]. 档案学研究, 2018, 32(6): 35-39.
Zhonghai CHEN, Dongbin LIU. Discussion on the definition method of Archives and its generic concept in laws and regulations. Archives Science Study, 2018, 32(6): 35-39.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.06.006 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2018/V32/I6/35

[1]	吴宝康主编. 档案学概论[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988:32,35.
[2]	吴宝康主编. 档案学概论[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988:32,35.
[3]	中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室.现代汉语词典(第5版)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005:838,644,645,1271.
[4]	中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. 现代汉语词典(第5版)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005:838,644,645,1271.
[5]	中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. 现代汉语词典(第5版)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005:838,644,645,1271.
[6]	吴宝康,冯子直主编.档案学词典[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1994:95-96,442.
[7]	王绍平等编著.图书情报词典[M]. 北京:汉语大词典出版社,1990:116.
[8]	董继超主编.普通秘书学[M]. 北京:中央广播电视大学出版社,1997:173.
[9]	陈鸿滨主编. 文书学[M]. 北京:中央广播电视大学出版社,1993:2.
[10]	陈兆,和宝荣,王英玮主编. 档案管理学基础(第三版)[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:10.
[11]	中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室.现代汉语词典(第5版)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005:838,644,645,1271.
[12]	吴宝康,冯子直主编.档案学词典[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1994:95-96,442.
[13]	百度百科·数据(计算机术语)[EB/OL].[2018-01-15]
[14]	《中华人民共和国档案法》修订草案(送审稿)[J]. 中国档案2016(07):17-22.
[15]	徐拥军,李晶伟,蔡美波. 对《档案法》修订草案的几点意见[J].档案学通讯,2016(06):7-10.\

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed