一种新范式：文件连续体理论的发展及应用

doi:10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.01.003

档案学研究

2018, Vol. 32

Issue (1): 14-21 DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.01.003

基础理论研究

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

一种新范式：文件连续体理论的发展及应用

连志英

上海大学图书情报档案系上海 200444

A New Paradigm: Development and Application of Records Continuum

Zhiying LIAN

School of Library, Information and Archival Studies, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444

全文:

HTML

PDF(607 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要:

针对目前学界存在的对文件连续体理论的一些误读,本文系统梳理和阐释了文件连续体理论的核心概念、产生背景、主要内容及其应用,指出文件连续体理论是在澳大利亚基于证据和连续体的文件管理思想、文件系列体系思想的基础上,借鉴后保管主义及结构化理论建构的后现代主义文件保管的新范式。它强调文件并非是中立物,文件的运动具有时空延伸性。该理论的终极诉求是建立一个自下而上的、可靠的文件保存体系,以完整保存集体记忆,促进社会民主发展。要实现这一诉求,文件的保存就需多方主体的参与和合作。文件连续体理论为文件管理提供了重要的理论框架,对建构完整的社会记忆具有重要的指导价值,同时也为对传统档案学的核心概念及理论进行批判性反思提供新的视角和工具。

Abstract：

This paper teases out and interprets the core terms, background, main contents and applications of records continuum in order to correct the misunderstandings existed in current literature. Records continuum is a new post-modern recordkeeping paradigm which is based on the records series and recordkeeping continuum in Australia, as well as on post-custodial ideas and structuration theory. It argues a record is not a neutral product, its creation and keeping is a highly social selective behavior, and it is always in the process of becoming. The movement of record is of time-space extension. The ultimate goal of records continuum is to construct a recordkeeping system from bottom up, to preserve complete collective memory and to promote the development of democracy. To realize this goal, multiple entities need to be involved in the recordkeeping. records continnum can provide key theoretical framework of the recordkeeping in the new era, it has a great value in the construction of social memory, and it also can provide a new perspective to reflect the key terms and theories of archival studies.

出版日期: 2018-08-30

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

连志英. 一种新范式：文件连续体理论的发展及应用[J]. 档案学研究, 2018, 32(1): 14-21.
Zhiying LIAN. A New Paradigm: Development and Application of Records Continuum. Archives Science Study, 2018, 32(1): 14-21.

链接本文:

http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.01.003 或 http://journal12.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dax/CN/Y2018/V32/I1/14

[1]	Sue MecKemmish. Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility[EB/OL].[2014-2-16]. .
[2]	Frank Upward.Modelling the Continuum as Paradigm Shift in Recordkeeping and Archiving Processes, and Beyond-A Personal Reflection[J].Records Manageme-nt Journal, 2000,10(3):115-139.
[3]	Terry Cook. Beyond the Screen: The Records Contin-uum and Archival Cultural Heritage[EB/OL].[2015-12-10]. .
[4]	Frank Upward.Structuring the Records Continuumpa-rt one: Postcustodial Principles and Properties[J]. Archives and Manuscripts,1996,24(2):268-285.
[5]	Frank Upward.Structuring the Records Continuumpa-rt one: Postcustodial Principles and Properties[J]. Archives and Manuscripts,1996,24(2):268-285;Frank Upward. Structuring the Records Continuumpart Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping[J]. Archives and Manuscripts,1997,25(1):10-35.
[6]	Sue McKemmish. Placing Records Continuum Theory and Practice[J]. Archival Science,2001,1(4):333-359.
[7]	Sue McKemmish. Traces: Document, Record, Archi-ve, Archives[A]. Sue McKemmish, Michael Piggott, Barbara Reed, Frank Upward. Archives: Recordkee-ping in Society[C]. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Infor-mation Studies, Charles Sturt University,2005: 1-20.
[8]	Sue McKemmish, Franklyn Herbert Upward,Barbara Reed. Records Continuum Model[A]. Marcia J. Bate-s Mary Niles Maack. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences(Third Edition). New York: Taylor and Francis, 2009: 4447-4460.
[9]	Steve Stuckey.Keepers of the Fame The Custodial role of Australian Archives—its History and its Future[A].Piggott McKemmish. The Records Continu-um:Ian Maclean and Australian Archives’ First Fifty Years[C]. Clayton,Australia: Ancora Press in assoc-iation with Austranlian Archives, 1994: 40.
[10]	Ian Maclean.Australian Experience in Records and Archives Management[J]. The American Archivist,1959,22(4):383-418.
[11]	Glenda Acland.Managing the Record Rather Than the Relics[J]. Archives and Manuscripts, 1992,20(1):57-63.
[12]	Frank Upward.Modelling the Continuum as Paradigm Shift in Recordkeeping and Archiving Processes, and Beyond-A Personal Reflection[J]. Records Management Journal, 2000,10(3):115-139.
[13]	见Peter Scott. The Record Group Concept: A Case for Abandonment[J]. The American Archivist, 1966,29(4):493-504. 其中,Scott对文件系列进行了说明,指出澳大利亚档案整理的层级包括三层:文件组合(类似于全宗)、文件系列、件或卷.而文件系列是由数字或其他特征控制的一组文件,它们处于同一系列数字或特征中;或不是由数字或特征控制,只是来自同一积累或归档过程,具有类似的物理形状及信息内容.
[14]	Peter Scott and G. Finlay. Archives and Administrative Change: Some Methods and Approaches(Part 1)[J]. Archives and Manuscripts,1978,7(3):115.
[15]	Terry Cook.The Concept of the Archival Fonds: Th- eory, Description, and Provenance in the Post-Custodial Era[A].Terry Eastwood. The Archival Fonds: From Theory to Practice[C]. Toronto: Bureau of Canadian Archivists, 1992: 38.
[16]	同上,63.
[17]	T. R. Schellenberg.Modern Archives. Principles and Techniques[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1956:18.
[18]	Sue MecKemmish. Recordkeeping in the Continuum:An Australian Tradition[A]. Anne Gilliland, Sue Mckemmish, Andrew J Lau. Research in the Archival Multiverse[C].Clayton: Monash University Press,2016:138.
[19]	同[1].
[20]	Babara Reeds.Reading the Records Continuum: Interpretations and Explorations[J]. Archives and Manus-cripts, 2005,33(1):18-43.
[21]	同[1].
[22]	Gilliland, Anne J.Sue McKemmish. The Role of Pa-r ticipatory Archives in Furthering Human Rights,Reconciliation and Recovery[A].Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice,2014: 79-88.
[23]	Joanne Evans, Sue McKemmish, Elizabeth Daniels.Gavan McCarthy. Self-determination and Archival Autonomy: Advocating Activism[J]. Archival Science, 2015,15(4):337-368.
[24]	Chris Hurley.Parallel Provenance:(1) What, if Anything, is Archival Description[J]. Archives and man-uscripts,2005,33(1):52-91.Hurley, Chris. Parallel Provenance:(2) When Something is not Related to Everything Else33(1): 52-91. Hurley, Chris. Parallel Provenance:(2) When Something is not Related to Everything Else[J]. Archives and Manuscripts,2005,33(2):10-45.
[25]	同[6].

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed